- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
- Posts
- 16,703
- Reaction score
- 11,456
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Because when Labuschange originally got selected Patterson was not in contention as he failed to even score one ton in that season. Yes overall he has a better record but how much do you pick players off there overall record and how much do you pick them off current form. For the UAE tour the form selection was Labuschange and Patterson had a better record but even then it was only 4 100s to 5 so Patterson’s record didn’t demand selectionThe reason Patterson wasn't a name being thrown around is because he is behind Burns, Renshaw, Maxwell and Pucovski. However he was also definitely ahead of Labuschagne and Finch on people's radar.
Labuschagne scored 2 100's in the 17/18 shield and only scored another 2 before that in the four years previous, so not sure how that's an argument that tips the scales in his favor over Patterson. Also funnily enough Cricket Australia's actual rationale for selecting him according to their website was that he made a 50 in a tour game. His 17/18 Shield season just got him into the A side (after an injury freed up a spot) imo:
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/key...lenn-maxwell-aaron-finch-joe-burns/2018-09-12
Don't have anything against Labuschagne as a bloke or player, but don't think there is any reasonable rationale or master plan behind the selectors backing him.









