![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/st_kilda.png)
Hubnester
Moderator
- Jul 11, 2010
- 5,380
- 13,193
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Moderator
- #635
Game Day - Round 11, 2024: Melbourne v St.Kilda - MCG - Sunday 26th May, 3.20pm AEST
https://www.afl.com.au/afl/matches/5992
![www.bigfooty.com](/forum/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bigfootycontent.com%2Fassets%2Flogo%2Fbigfooty-favicon-yellow.png&hash=f55945a903a6f0f2f8889a82720494ef&return_error=1)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BL v StK · WB v FRE · RIC v HAW · ADE v SYD · NM v COL · GWS v PA ·
And post your "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
that's it.Well im going and what's more...expecting to win
No current season stats available
The responsibility is on the people at the club right now. Improve, get better. Don't think for a second that clubs like Geelong and Sydney ever think the key to their success is outside their club. They know they can identify people from outside the club they want to bring in, but if can't get those people, then they just back who they have, and those people back themselves.
IMO if we keep thinking we're one piece away, that piece never comes. And that is a defence mechanism which enables one to sleep at night without really doing what is necessary to achieve the clubs singular key objective: to win the premiership.
The 2016, 2017 and 2021 Premiers are all great examples of what a club and the people inside it can do if they finally accept the responsibility to achieve.
The club is seeing something in Collard that I am yet to that's for sure
I more think the point was it doesn't really matter whether we take pick 3, pick 8 or pick 13. The environment they come into and how their talent is developed once they are in the door is far more important than the draft pick number itself.
We've taken plenty of picks at the top end of the draft that haven't turned out the way we wanted while players we've drafted in the teens look far more promising, likely because we have better development systems in place now.
Clark is not remotely close to being in our top 10 players. He has been given all the chances in the world.We rushed Crouch back and set him back 10 weeks, so not surprised he is being eased back into it. Clark I assume the same, these 2 are in our best 10 players when fit
The club is seeing something in Collard that I am yet to that's for sure
Clark is not remotely close to being in pur top 10 players. He has been given all the chances in the world.
Has he ever had 30 possessions as a midfielder. I seriously doubt it. Just can't get his hands on the pill. His opponent on the other hand is guaranteed a day out.
Not AFL standard unfortunately.
well liked him last year.Wow Collard is fortunate to retain his place in the side even if he is the sub. I guess being sub gives him 30 minutes of footy, only slightly less than he had in an entire game last week. Sandringham are going to have a decent side this week, I wonder how that side would go against the AFL side.
Sharman is the another of Lyon's latest projects, he subs him out most games yet keeps playing him. He obviously sees something?
Also great examples of how you need truly elite players (which you draft with top 10 picks) in your starting 22 to even compete for, let alone win a flag.
It's not either/or.
It's both
Yea. This forum is sometimes a bit bi polar.View attachment 1999057
Fantastic that they're giving Collard a run at it. Looking forward to his maiden goal.
Yea. This forum is sometimes a bit bi polar.
We get some screaming 'play the kids, get games into them'.
Others, why are we playing the kids, it's too early.
Selectors can't win.
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
View attachment 1999057
Fantastic that they're giving Collard a run at it. Looking forward to his maiden goal.
Sharman is the another of Lyon's latest projects, he subs him out most games yet keeps playing him. He obviously sees something?