Round 2 Discussion

[big bootaaaaah]

POTY contender! Well done.

POTY??? I'm calling Friday night beer goggles.

 

[douls]

POTY??? I'm calling Friday night beer goggles.

View attachment 231019

She's hanging on for dear life and he can't even get his arms around her, pissa!!

Gold

 

[Hairy Lager]

POTY??? I'm calling Friday night beer goggles.

View attachment 231019

Cottesloe beach, year 2000.
Pissed c***s... shit loads.
Babies unknown?

 

[Stevi_Tigers]

3/272 dusty,dew,rance

 

[big bootaaaaah]

She's hanging on for dear life and he can't even get his arms around her, pissa!!

Gold

If you look very closely you'll see she's a Suns supporter

 

[Fyfetheknife]

434/4
Projected is still only 2047

Had Pendles, Dusty, Houli, Dew

 

[St BKD]

209 from Dusty and Rance. Have VC on Dusty but doubt I'll take it.

Lmao... trolling? Why wouldn't you?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[catstorm]

Lmao... trolling? Why wouldn't you?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

It's not that good a score that you would take the C off of say Goldy, Ablett, or maybe Danger.

 

[St BKD]

It's not that good a score that you would take the C off of say Goldy, Ablett, or maybe Danger.

Surely your joking? Take the gamble on say Goldy and he gets injured.. for what? The hope he gets 150 and you get 16 more? Risk 134 points to get an extra 16? Would be one of the stupidest things ever

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[Satan]

Might as well put up the score before sbs

4/419
Dusty , jroo, pendles,xanadu
And f.... Off gault for the papley is already winner, useless kayaker

 

[catstorm]

Surely your joking? Take the gamble on say Goldy and he gets injured.. for what? The hope he gets 150 and you get 16 more? Risk 134 points to get an extra 16? Would be one of the stupidest things ever

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

You do what you gotta do, but I'm confident my C will out score Martin

 

[St BKD]

You do what you gotta do, but I'm confident my C will out score Martin

You should pull the pin on SC

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[catstorm]

You should pull the pin on SC

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

Right because I play different to you and your way Is objectively the correct way to play.
Risk big win big, but like I said do what you gotta do as long as your happy with mediocrity.

 

[Kadog]

Right because I play different to you and your way Is objectively the correct way to play.
Risk big win big, but like I said do what you gotta do as long as your happy with mediocrity.

Yeah because 134 is mediocre.

 

[St BKD]

Right because I play different to you and your way Is objectively the correct way to play.
Risk big win big, but like I said do what you gotta do as long as your happy with mediocrity.

Ignorance is bliss I suppose

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[catstorm]

Yeah because 134 is mediocre.

That's not what I ment, I was talking about an overall passive always go by the numbers play style.

You're not gonna win like that, you're going to be part of the pack.

 

[St BKD]

That's not what I ment, I was talking about an overall passive always go by the numbers play style.

You're not gonna win like that, you're going to be part of the pack.

If you continue to risk134 for 16 odd in the absolute best case scenario your going to have a below mediocre year

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

 

[Kadog]

That's not what I ment, I was talking about an overall passive always go by the numbers play style.

You're not gonna win like that, you're going to be part of the pack.

What do you mean by overall passive style? The other poster merely pointed that you're potentially risking a great vc for a possible 15 extra points. There's nothing passive or mediocre in that statement. He's advising you to play the percentages.

It's a big risk for little reward but hey, go for it and gloat afterwards that you have huge balls for a few extra points.

 

[Feerits Elf]

That's not what I ment, I was talking about an overall passive always go by the numbers play style.

You're not gonna win like that, you're going to be part of the pack.

My suspicion is your 80k rank in 2015 is compelling you to take unnecessary risks in 2016 to try to get an early jump on the pack.

 

[catstorm]

What do you mean by overall passive style? The other poster merely pointed that you're potentially risking a great vc for a possible 15 extra points. There's nothing passive or mediocre in that statement. He's advising you to play the percentages.

It's a big risk for little reward but hey, go for it and gloat afterwards that you have huge balls for a few extra points.

See you at the end of the round

 

[ROOINYOU]

I'll be taking Dusty's double points.last week I had VC on Ablett's 139 and cashed in and was very happy.sure Danger went on to pump out 160+ but I had the C on fyfe and that could have been pretty ugly...anything over 125 is a lock in my book.250 from a skipper each week would make me one happy SCer.
Good luck to all riskin it...Silly or Brave? we'll see...

 

[hoddo]

Madness to even consider passing up a 134 point VC.
Last week I took the C off Danger when GAj scored 139. That cost me 23 points but I don't care because I know that tactic will score me the most points over the course of the season. There are justifiable risks and there is stupidity.

 

[Sidebottom2Beams]

Yeah because 134 is mediocre.

 

[Seppo]

Taking Dustbin 134 as VC.

That's about par.

 

[ROOINYOU]

434/4
Projected is still only 2047

Had Pendles, Dusty, Houli, Dew

no VC on Dusty? could be 568/4.
thought/hoped Menadue would score more...