Remove this Banner Ad

Round 5 discussion thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Butler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Damn it, why does my SC team always do better than my DT!?

Cotchin DT: 84
Cotchin SC: 144

743/7+C
 
Pittard a late withdrawal and Stevenson comes in (FMDT) according to the Port Adelaide Facebook page.

No rolling lockout in DT so that I can bench Pittard for Terlich/Stevenson :mad:
 
521/5 big day today

GAJ (C)
Danger
Rowe
Gibbs
SJ
Bartel
Libba
Goodes
Heath
Pittard
Wines
JOM
JJK
Cox
 
Pittard a late withdrawal and Stevenson comes in (FMDT) according to the Port Adelaide Facebook page.

No rolling lockout in DT so that I can bench Pittard for Terlich/Stevenson :mad:

If true, This could really stuff up anyone who used Stevenson in the captain loophole!
 
If true, This could really stuff up anyone who used Stevenson in the captain loophole!

I think anyone who did understood the risk of a late change. Stevenson was omitted due to form and not injury or suspension. No, I didn't have him as captain. :p

It irritates me in that I put the emergency on Pittard ahead of Stevenson. If one of my five remaining backs are a late out then it's a donut.

*crosses fingers*
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I think anyone who did understood the risk of a late change. Stevenson was omitted due to form and not injury or suspension. No, I didn't have him as captain. :p

It irritates me in that I put the emergency on Pittard ahead of Stevenson. If one of my five remaining backs are a late out then it's a donut.

*crosses fingers*

Not what the article says...

Richardson says it is a logical move to bring Stevenson back into the team and that his original omission from the final 22 was not form-based.

“The reason he (Stevenson) was out was because we had one too many defenders once we’d made the decision to bring Paul Stewart back in,” he explained.

“West Coast have a big forward line – Kennedy, Darling, Cox or Sinclair, LeCras – and we had to go in with a bigger defence and one of Pittard or Stevo would miss out.

It wasn’t a decision based on form, it was just ‘horses for courses’”

“Now with Jasper out Stevo has the opportunity to come back in.”
 
Not what the article says...

Richardson says it is a logical move to bring Stevenson back into the team and that his original omission from the final 22 was not form-based.

“The reason he (Stevenson) was out was because we had one too many defenders once we’d made the decision to bring Paul Stewart back in,” he explained.

“West Coast have a big forward line – Kennedy, Darling, Cox or Sinclair, LeCras – and we had to go in with a bigger defence and one of Pittard or Stevo would miss out.

It wasn’t a decision based on form, it was just ‘horses for courses’”

“Now with Jasper out Stevo has the opportunity to come back in.”

Thanks for the correction. :thumbsu:

Clearly I demonstrated I didn't watch last week's Port game.
 
Have heath coming in for pittard now. Good thing I didnt trade out stevenson- he still has a bit of money to make.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

And they're rumours that he could get the dreaded green vest....

Doubtful. If the reason he was dropped was because they wanted to go taller in defence then with Pittard out, he should just slot into Pittards spot. I doubt Pittard was going to be the sub.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom