It's suspiciously like the good Essendon showing up against teams that don't put on serious midfield pressure. Just luck I suppose!First up the Dogs are either very good or very poor. We always get the very good version for some reason.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's suspiciously like the good Essendon showing up against teams that don't put on serious midfield pressure. Just luck I suppose!First up the Dogs are either very good or very poor. We always get the very good version for some reason.
Langford was actually drafted to play half forward / half back. Was converted to midfield because we lacked big bodied players. BC AD hasn't recruited a genuine inside mid.
Fantaisia is hardly a fail. Was a 40 goal small forward before he racked up a few injuries. Fair call.
Naming players like Geulfi is irrelevant. He was pick 67. Pick 67 is more often than not a fail. Ok, then delist and move on.
One thing Dodoro does do is draft flankers. He has too much Sheedy banging around in his head thinking he can turn these players into something else. This is my point, stop recruiting players to turn them into something else, recruit players that excel in their positions that they have had success in.
As others have mentioned he does not coach or develop them. That is on the coaching staff. I get that, but you can only develop and coach a player so much. So would a player like Heppell vs a player like Laverde, they are in the same coaching environment, the same development programme, yet are miles apart from a performance point of view... Why? Because you can only get so much out of person. Do you think the same time, effort and resource has gone into both players? Now the coaches may have fully succeeded with Laverde but he has reached his ceiling as a player. IMO that's on AD, he has brought in the the product for the coaches to work with. Like a lambo vs a Commodore, I feel like we have too many Commodores on our list.
Again, just my opinion.
It's suspiciously like the good Essendon showing up against teams that don't put on serious midfield pressure. Just luck I suppose!
Sounds like the bus didn't take off, maybe they were waiting for North to scab a liftA lot of blokes must have thought they were still on the team bus tonight. Passengers everywhere.
1993!- Umpiring was shithouse in the first half. Set them up for the win completely. I legitimately don't remember the last time we got the rub of the green from those campaigners.
Doesn't help that when he does draft one (Hibberd) he plays on a wingHey. I posted something similar on our board but I want some of your opinions on it. These are the heights of both teams best four midfielders imo.
Shiel - 182cm
McGrath - 178cm
Merrett - 180cm
Smith - 174cm
Bontempelli - 193cm
Macrae - 191cm
Dunkley - 190cm
Smith - 185cm
That has to be a major concern for you guys, doesn’t it? Why doesn’t Dodoro seem to draft big midfielders? I don’t think I’ve been worried about losing a centre clearance since Bev took over.
How do you fix it? I know pre draft Langford was meant to be that player. Just think it’s big in modern footy to have atleast one big midfielder.
The draft is a market. You pick the best available player at your pick for the position you need. The two don't necessarily go together. If all the big-bodied mids (or ruck or other specialist position you need) are gone then you pick the player you think will provide the widest range. Hence flankers. The impact of losing picks in the saga cannot be over-estimated.Langford was actually drafted to play half forward / half back. Was converted to midfield because we lacked big bodied players. BC AD hasn't recruited a genuine inside mid.
Fantaisia is hardly a fail. Was a 40 goal small forward before he racked up a few injuries. Fair call.
Naming players like Geulfi is irrelevant. He was pick 67. Pick 67 is more often than not a fail. Ok, then delist and move on.
One thing Dodoro does do is draft flankers. He has too much Sheedy banging around in his head thinking he can turn these players into something else. This is my point, stop recruiting players to turn them into something else, recruit players that excel in their positions that they have had success in.
As others have mentioned he does not coach or develop them. That is on the coaching staff. I get that, but you can only develop and coach a player so much. So would a player like Heppell vs a player like Laverde, they are in the same coaching environment, the same development programme, yet are miles apart from a performance point of view... Why? Because you can only get so much out of person. Do you think the same time, effort and resource has gone into both players? Now the coaches may have fully succeeded with Laverde but he has reached his ceiling as a player. IMO that's on AD, he has brought in the the product for the coaches to work with. Like a lambo vs a Commodore, I feel like we have too many Commodores on our list.
Again, just my opinion.
Normally I keep myself composed when watching the footy at home. That call pissed me right off.The ump who paid HTB vs Merrett with Wallis laying on this back after riding him to the ground should be charged with a crime!!
Stringer, Macrae both top 10 2012, bont in ‘13 and Dunkley at #25 in 2015. Dogs have one of the best recruiting departments in the league. Rarely miss on a top 30 selection.Speaking of recruiting - from Dogs board
"Our first picks at the last four drafts: Cody Weightman, Bailey Smith, Aaron Naughton, Tim English. We've done pretty well I think"
Hard to disagree. Bailey Smith is a ripper and English who showed signs all last year is already starting to dominate games. Great one two combo addition to any midfield.
Injuries to key players and size difference between our midfield would be contributing factors there I reckon.It’s like when any team puts on some pressure we go to water
Sure, that goes without saying. At some point those at the top need to be made responsible for all these poor decisions. I'd be sacking Tanner's replacement.I don’t get how we suddenly forget how to apply pressure when we’ve been doing to great effect the last few weeks. Is it a fitness thing? Sack Murphy?
Hey. I posted something similar on our board but I want some of your opinions on it. These are the heights of both teams best four midfielders imo.
Shiel - 182cm
McGrath - 178cm
Merrett - 180cm
Smith - 174cm
Bontempelli - 193cm
Macrae - 191cm
Dunkley - 190cm
Smith - 185cm
That has to be a major concern for you guys, doesn’t it? Why doesn’t Dodoro seem to draft big midfielders? I don’t think I’ve been worried about losing a centre clearance since Bev took over.
How do you fix it? I know pre draft Langford was meant to be that player. Just think it’s big in modern footy to have atleast one big midfielder.
This is a good point and one I've been annoyed at for a long time. Our mids, whilst good players, are all skinny kids, basically. Bar maybe Heppell. Shiel is a good size but only 182cm~.Hey. I posted something similar on our board but I want some of your opinions on it. These are the heights of both teams best four midfielders imo.
Shiel - 182cm
McGrath - 178cm
Merrett - 180cm
Smith - 174cm
Bontempelli - 193cm
Macrae - 191cm
Dunkley - 190cm
Smith - 185cm
That has to be a major concern for you guys, doesn’t it? Why doesn’t Dodoro seem to draft big midfielders? I don’t think I’ve been worried about losing a centre clearance since Bev took over.
How do you fix it? I know pre draft Langford was meant to be that player. Just think it’s big in modern footy to have atleast one big midfielder.
god i wish that was usStringer, Macrae both top 10 2012, bont in ‘13 and Dunkley at #25 in 2015. Dogs have one of the best recruiting departments in the league. Rarely miss on a top 30 selection.