yaco55
Hall of Famer
5 Watson
4 Hibberd
3 Dempsey
2 Goddard
1 Hocking
4 Hibberd
3 Dempsey
2 Goddard
1 Hocking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sorry for the intrusion but were Stanton's 39 touches not particularly good?
Can't figure out how he could be left out of the votes.
Maybe he deserves 1 or 2 votes but no more - he dropped 2 or 3 simple chest marks, and whilst he found plenty of the ball I don't think he was as good as at least 3 or 4 other on the ground
They were effective, but not overly damaging. He played a lot of his kicks safe. Dempsey and Hibberd were much more damaging with their run and carry, IMO.Thanks mate.
From what I saw of the game I thought he put in a really good 4 quarter effort.
From his 39 touches, 74.4% efficiency and 3 clangers, which suggests that he generally used the ball pretty well.
I realise that Watson was better, and Zaka as well (despite fading out a bit). Just not sure how someone with 29 effective touches could be only 6th-8th best on ground.
He'd have to be odd on you'd think, considering he is the only player in the running for back to back brownolws5. Watson (has got to be the value bet for back to back Brownlows...)
4. Dempsey
3. Zaka
2. Hibberd
1. Goddard
Too close to call: Heppell, Stanton, Carlisle, Hooker,Kommer



