Remove this Banner Ad

MVP Round 9; Richmond VS Essendon

  • Thread starter Thread starter yaco55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

5. Watson
4. Hibberd
3. Goddard
2. Dempsey
1. Zaharakis

Stants unlucky, but Zaka great when it counted early. Carlisle and Hooksy also awesome again
 
Sorry for the intrusion but were Stanton's 39 touches not particularly good?
Can't figure out how he could be left out of the votes.

Maybe he deserves 1 or 2 votes but no more - he dropped 2 or 3 simple chest marks, and whilst he found plenty of the ball I don't think he was as good as at least 3 or 4 other on the ground
 
5. Watson (Why oh why did i not choose this week to make him my SC captain... )
4. Stants
3. Hibberd
2. Goddard
1. Dempsey
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Maybe he deserves 1 or 2 votes but no more - he dropped 2 or 3 simple chest marks, and whilst he found plenty of the ball I don't think he was as good as at least 3 or 4 other on the ground

Thanks mate.
From what I saw of the game I thought he put in a really good 4 quarter effort.
From his 39 touches, 74.4% efficiency and 3 clangers, which suggests that he generally used the ball pretty well.
I realise that Watson was better, and Zaka as well (despite fading out a bit). Just not sure how someone with 29 effective touches could be only 6th-8th best on ground.
 
5. Watson
4. Hibberd
3. Hocking
2. Dempsey
1. Stanton
 
Thanks mate.
From what I saw of the game I thought he put in a really good 4 quarter effort.
From his 39 touches, 74.4% efficiency and 3 clangers, which suggests that he generally used the ball pretty well.
I realise that Watson was better, and Zaka as well (despite fading out a bit). Just not sure how someone with 29 effective touches could be only 6th-8th best on ground.
They were effective, but not overly damaging. He played a lot of his kicks safe. Dempsey and Hibberd were much more damaging with their run and carry, IMO.
 
5. Watson (has got to be the value bet for back to back Brownlows...)
4. Dempsey
3. Zaka
2. Hibberd
1. Goddard

Too close to call: Heppell, Stanton, Carlisle, Hooker,Kommer
 
5. Watson (has got to be the value bet for back to back Brownlows...)
4. Dempsey
3. Zaka
2. Hibberd
1. Goddard

Too close to call: Heppell, Stanton, Carlisle, Hooker,Kommer
He'd have to be odd on you'd think, considering he is the only player in the running for back to back brownolws ;)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

5. Watson - Outstanding, this is what good captains do.
4. Hibberd - AA performance continues
3. Stanton - Love his gut running.
2. Dempsey - He plays, we are much better.
1. Hocking - Put a hold on both Deledio & Cotchin

Unlucky- Kommer, Carlisle, Goddard, Howlett & Zaharakis

0. Jack Riewoldt for being such a petulant bitch. I bet he's still whining he didn't get to kick that goal his team scored.
 
5/ Watson - does something every time we need a lift.
4/ Dempsey - please don't be a nuffy again with Instagram.
3/ Hibberd - oh the jealousy of every club that missed this gem.
2/ Goddard - rounds us off as a team.
1/ Stanton - weight of disposals through sheer workrate gets him in ahead of Hocking who I found it very difficult to leave out. And I can't put Zaka in the votes until he can give us 4 qtrs of the damaging stuff he gave us in bursts tonight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom