Remove this Banner Ad

Sack a selector

Which selector should be sacked?

  • David Boon

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jamie Cox

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Merv Hughes

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Jul 12, 2004
Posts
64,646
Reaction score
20,403
Location
Junktion Oval
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
England
So the time has come, Friday morning in Melbourne the CA board will meet and decide which of the selectors will be sacked to make way for Greg Chappell. Unfortunately Hilditch is safe untill the World Cup so its down to 3, although I have a strong feeling I know who will win this poll ;)
 
obviously swervyn mervyn will make way, but it will do nothing to stem the flow of taswegians littering the side
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Jamie Cox, Merv Hughes and Andrew Hilditch should be given the sack!!!

Merv is more interested in making TV appearances on Channel 10 whilst Hilditch loves to indulge in the hook shot whilst making comments about our selection policies. He is more interested in walking his Golden Retriever down Glenelg Beach.

Jamie Cox has a conflict of interest. He is the High Performance Director of SACA and how can CA endorse his selection nomination?

THE GOVERNOR
 

Remove this Banner Ad

all of them. bring some new blood that has just recently retired from test cricket in the last 7 years
 
Hard to argue against merv going, guy was a lion heart cricketer and a genuine personality to boot but he's an awful selector who seems to see the job as money for nothing.

But it's sad when you can't really find compelling cases to keep the other dropkicks.

At this moment i would trust chappell picking the team by himself over having any combo of the others working with him.
 
Jamie Cox has to be released to make way for GS Chappell. He is the High Performance Director of South Australian cricket and it appears he has a conflict of interest.

Merv and Boony have test match experience and will be mentored by the great GS Chappell who gave them their first taste of test cricket back in 1984 and 1985.

The Happy Hooker will bow out after the 2011 World Cup and he continues to make blunders by favouring mature age batsmen and young fast bowlers. And, if you look at the One Day XI and 20-20 XI, the teams are full of young players (Warner, Stephen Smith, Mitchell Starc etc). Is not that funny?

It will be totally logical for GS Chappell to become our new CHairman after the 2011 World Cup. He is a full time employee of CA and he is responsible for making sure we will become the number 1 test nation in test cricket. So, he will go by the old formulae of picking youth ahead of mature age batters whose age is at least 25. Chappell will be prepared to become adventourous by picking 20 to 21 year old batsmen to play test cricket to give them a chance to test their game against quality bowling.

If you really look at things in hindsight, I am prepared to say the amount of runs Hodge, North and Katich have scored in SHield cricket to win a Baggy Green Cap is totally overrated. They scored their runs against average bowling attacks who are not up to test match standard.

In conclusion, it would be great to see the departure of Hilditch and Cox for 2 new selectors who will pick youth ahead of mature age batsmen.

THE GOVERNOR
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Gov, those guys made those runs when Kaspa, Bichel, Lee, Gillespie etc were still playing regular domestic cricket.

Lee and Dizzy were not playing regular domestic cricket from 2002 to 2007. From memory, Brett Lee was 12th man on countless occasions during the 2004-2005 season whilst Kaspa and Gillespie were playing test matches for Australia.

Has our cricket programming allowed for 3 to 4 shield games to be played before the 1st test match? During this time, all of our test players are available to fine tune their 4 day game whilst the budding young players have a chance to score runs against top quality bowling and claim the scalps of our test match regulars.

How can the selectors pick Katich and North on the back of a glutton of runs being scored against average shield bowling attacks?

Ignore YOUTH AT YOUR OWN PERIL
 
Is it also true Merv was part of the Fanatics tour for the last Ashes tour to the UK and wasn't fulfilling his role as a selector?
 
Lee and Dizzy were not playing regular domestic cricket from 2002 to 2007. From memory, Brett Lee was 12th man on countless occasions during the 2004-2005 season whilst Kaspa and Gillespie were playing test matches for Australia.

Has our cricket programming allowed for 3 to 4 shield games to be played before the 1st test match? During this time, all of our test players are available to fine tune their 4 day game whilst the budding young players have a chance to score runs against top quality bowling and claim the scalps of our test match regulars.

How can the selectors pick Katich and North on the back of a glutton of runs being scored against average shield bowling attacks?

Ignore YOUTH AT YOUR OWN PERIL

I see you point for sure but using Katich was a bad example. His batting at Test level has been terrific.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom