- Banned
- #1
Correct myself I'm wrong, but the term, "Flith", "Scum" can only be used by Carlton, Essendon & Collingwood supporters when describing each other?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

But yes, each of these three clubs can name the other two "Scum" and "Filth"
Log in to remove this Banner Ad



yes that is correct. But all the try hard clubs still try to use it, with the false sense that their clubs are actually important.Correct myself I'm wrong, but the term, "Flith", "Scum" can only be used by Carlton, Essendon & Collingwood supporters when describing each other?
Richmond= LOLCollingwood=skunks.
Carlcheat=scum.
Essendon=arrogant sons of bitches.
Collingwood=skunks.
Carlcheat=scum.
Essendon=arrogant sons of bitches.
Love how teams like the Saints try and get in on the act 'omg we're playing the filth/the skunks'. Pity their own relevance does not exist.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=541819All three terms would generally apply to West Coke Eagles.
Carlton = shit

Flith??????
Please enlighten the Bay comrades as to what this means???
You Pie flogs cant even Troll properly...![]()
How did you spell it "Flith" twice?
But yes, each of these three clubs can name the other two "Scum" and "Filth" for Collingwood :
Carlton : Scum
Essendom : Filth.
Any other supporter using these terms are wannabe Big 3 supporters (Ninthmond is no longer "Big").
That is what I'm after. i.e. A Hawthorn "supporter" calling i.e. Essendon scum is out of place.