Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - Rd 7 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 7 Games
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Did he appear in the media before the tribunal slagging Selwood?
I think the agitation showed by Des snr "on air" will be excused by the fact that he was actually talking to Howard Sattler at the time.No, he didnt .. although his father was a little less reserved
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think the agitation showed by Des snr "on air" will be excused by the fact that he was actually talking to Howard Sattler at the time.
Sattler could move Pope Benedict to use strong language.
I heard it live and sattler made no mention of trying to contact Des Snr. I certainly thought Des Snr must have rang in after being infuriated by sattlers behavior that Monday afternoon.
Des didnt say a word publicly. They have nothing on him.
Leading up to the tribunal no, on the tribunal night itself however Des put his foot in his mouth big time
Did he tell the truth? Fancy that...
Headland told what he thought was true, and it got proven to be unsubstantiated and Selwood was declared Not-guilty as a result
Headland may think it's true, but because he doesn't have the evidence to back himself up, he's now left himself wide open to legal recourse for his accusation on Selwood
Headland told what he thought was true, and it got proven to be unsubstantiated and Selwood was declared Not-guilty as a result
Headland may think it's true, but because he doesn't have the evidence to back himself up, he's now left himself wide open to legal recourse for his accusation on Selwood
Headland told what he thought was true, and it got proven to be unsubstantiated and Selwood was declared Not-guilty as a result
Headland may think it's true, but because he doesn't have the evidence to back himself up, he's now left himself wide open to legal recourse for his accusation on Selwood
Ah no.
According to Tom Percy QC on 6pr this morning, people who discuss matters in court/tribunals need to be able to tell the truth and are therefore given leeway with the evidence they give.
He also said legal action is very unlikely to succeed.
Sorry but a defamation case will not take into account the tribunal result.
The tribunal was about Headland proving Selwood saying the comments
The legal case would be about Headland making the comments, so yeah the tribunal wouldn't be taken into consideration
When did the AFL turn into weekly espisodes of Law and Order?
Dude, your cred's a bit "suss" after your bullshit on Grover earlier this week.
I got that from a fellow poster who reported it on the main board, and subsequently apologised to Ripper for posting false information
However, look up the transcripts from last night, Des said it and was reported last night, again not my words
I hope he goes for it.Selwood doesn't want this to drag out, I'd be very surprised if there was any legal action.
I hope they try to sue aswell,whatever did happen to those medical reports of Fletchers?Were they ever released?I wonder why.They wont sue, Even though I hope they do ....as Im sure Des will stick by his story...
Remember the threats from Fletcher managers ?> What happened ? Huff an Puff ... just appeasing WCE fans .
I hope they try to sue aswell,whatever did happen to those medical reports of Fletchers?Were they ever released?I wonder why.