- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Posts
- 56,948
- Reaction score
- 42,168
- Location
- Canberra
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Adelaide Crows
Meh.. title changed again.
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
6 Winner: Torree
specifically pick 62 & rookie draft
- Thread starter lunacy
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Posts
- 56,948
- Reaction score
- 42,168
- Location
- Canberra
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Adelaide Crows
Trying to work out how that could have happened...
Presumably it means that one club doesn't have enough positions left to use all of their picks before #61 (thereby completing their draft participation before our 2nd selection). Only catch with that theory is that every single club uses at least one selection after #62 - even if they're only being used for rookie upgrades or father/son selections.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Geelong doesn't use any selections after promoting Podsiardly with pick 58.
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2005
- Posts
- 56,948
- Reaction score
- 42,168
- Location
- Canberra
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood, Adelaide Crows
But were they originally slated to use picks 59-61? If not, then it shouldn't make any difference.
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
- Posts
- 6,040
- Reaction score
- 33
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
Yeah I think its an anomaly because Geelong got #57 (now #58) for Djeukererkeaareeaa. They also have the following pick (#58, now #59) but because they have done all their rookie promotions and picks by that stage they are dropping out of the draft so #59 becomes St Kilda's. A whole lot of confusing back and forth.
