This doesn’t make sense to me.Also the sallaries are not big enough vs the other sports. Fine to make a man pack up and move his family for 30M a year. But when these guys are on 200... hard to do that
If you’re an 18 year old kid in the draft standing to earn $100k - you are expected to go anywhere in the country. Getting paid a million dollars? Nah couldn’t possibly move you even down the road.
While I agree wages should probably be a little better especially for the bottom end, setting the expectation that this job requires you to move to a different state shouldn’t be too hard to include in the collective bargaining agreement. And if players don’t like it then they can play VFL or SANFL or whatever instead and get to stay in their state and being paid to reflect this.
If they must bring in some restrictions:
- Can only be traded when contracted if your on more than 500k a year (stops the poor players that are struggling to make ends meet uproot their lives..)
- Clubs must pay $50k ‘moving’ allowance (outside of cap) when trading in from a different city (fix the cost to move their life. they can rent if they want)
- Can’t trade a player to a different state less than 5 years since they’ve moved (provide some stability)
Completely spitballing but the idea is that allowing for a fairer competition is not feasible or overly onerous is just not true.
Right now the players are wanting all the good stuff from the US (millions dollars a year, sponsorships outside the game, long breaks and byes , Free Agency, etc) without the negatives of US sport (can be traded anywhere without consent).
We have a salary cap but it does nothing when clubs can’t use it to trade in players because they’re undesirable. North will never win another flag while we will see Geelong, Collingwood, Brisbane and Hawks share the premiership amongst themselves. It’s getting the EPL level.





