Who currently on the St Kilda list has been found guilty of bashing a woman?
Nice try
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Steven Baker found guilty
- Thread starter Baroclinic instability
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Who currently on the St Kilda list has been found guilty of bashing a woman?
Nice try
Stronzo
Hall of Famer
You're not really keeping up are you?
i think you need to point to an press article where a st kilda player has been found guilty...
- Banned
- #704
No means No, except to a couple of current Aint and never will be players.
Also, there are toilets provided in bars for the purpose of urination.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
farmer was following baker, baker stopped and you agree that farmer ran into the back of baker, while baker and farmer were running in a straight line?
seriously?
jeez just about every player is going to get reported and suspended if that is an offense now.
erm would you like to say what the saints players were charged with?
as for urinating in public, while that is pretty disgusting its hardly bashing someone is it?
sydjackson
Team Captain
Where are you Fireman? - i am awaiting your response to this question on "the block". Or was it just a little difficult to get your head around?
Please enlighten me.
- Mar 2, 2007
- 43,740
- 64,729
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
It's amazing the leniency being a well off public figure can buy sometimes. Just ask OJ. Or any American Senator.
once again I ask you to identify where a st kilda player has been found guilty?
on the other had we KNOW farmer is a drink driver and a wife beater...
Actually your wrong
- Jun 25, 2006
- 11,478
- 9,246
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Defacto beater! Dont go giving Jeff Farmer a bad repuation.
- Mar 2, 2007
- 43,740
- 64,729
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
You're right they were never found guilty.
Robert Mugabe has never been found guilty of any crimes either. Not that I'm comparing any footballers to madman Mugabe. He's just an example that a guilty verdict from the legal system isn't the be all and end all when it comes to moral issues.
God are you guys still sooking?
Baker was reported by umpire Brett Allen in round 11 for a very similar incident. But Brent Harvey didn't sustain such horrific injuries so no real case to answer.
http://www.aflpa.com.au/media/TribReasR6_R11_07.pdf
http://www.aflpa.com.au/media/TribReasR6_R11_07.pdf
- Banned
- #715
Anyway back on topic (this dan warna's uncalled for attacks on Jeff rey are getting oh so boring), a poster on another site found this which shows Baker has previous form:
Edit: See above
Edit: See above
JeffDunne
TheBrownDog
I know it's staggering to think you Freo scumbags are still celebrating this victory.
Don't you have a life?
- Jun 25, 2006
- 11,478
- 9,246
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
I dont think a single Fremantle fan has taken this case personally. It seems all Saint supporters are bagging Fremantle but we dont really care. If he got off I really wouldnt care, doesnt effect my club one bit.
Sorry I missed the question, ok, I am going on what Baker has said and which has been echoed by all witnesses, so therefore pretty easy to get your head around.
By all accounts he was in front of Farmer with his back to him, surely you would have heard these accounts from diff sources, no?
I don't know if he lifted his arm , I didn't see it, either did the tribunal.
Baker said he stopped in front of Farmer and they condemned him on that, bit strange don't you think?
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Baker is one player who I really have a constant battle with myself as to whether I hate or like him.
I really admire that he is able to get the absolute best out of himself, and achieve more than many people with so much more talent than him does.
I loathe that he plays outside the spirit of the game. You could also say that he plays outside of the rules, but it's the umpires jobs to enforce those rules, so if they don't it's not Baker's fault. You could also argue that every team has a player or two that comes close to crossing that line as well.
Seven weeks is a huge suspension, even though he had some points hanging over his head from his previous bad record. Surely no player would be so stupid as to deliberately hit a player off the ball that causes such major damage in this current sanitised environment that is AFL football today.
I really admire that he is able to get the absolute best out of himself, and achieve more than many people with so much more talent than him does.
I loathe that he plays outside the spirit of the game. You could also say that he plays outside of the rules, but it's the umpires jobs to enforce those rules, so if they don't it's not Baker's fault. You could also argue that every team has a player or two that comes close to crossing that line as well.
Seven weeks is a huge suspension, even though he had some points hanging over his head from his previous bad record. Surely no player would be so stupid as to deliberately hit a player off the ball that causes such major damage in this current sanitised environment that is AFL football today.
best you have a good look back through the posts.
JeffDunne
TheBrownDog
- Banned
- #723
Oh please.
Try reading just this thread again.
Freo = compulsive liars.
Damn, you're still at it?
There seems to be four types of posters on this massive thread:
(1) honest and intelligent football supporters who realize that Baker was seemingly hard done by to receive 7 weeks for a bump when there are no witnesses or cameras;
(2) pathetic one-eyed biased (non-Fremantle) supporters who don't like Baker and lack the necessary intelligence to form an opinion based on common sense;
(3) Fremantle supporters angry that their player has been struck and care not for facts (and whose opinion is therefore irrelevant); and
(4) St.Kilda supporters (myself included) who are also biased and are no doubt annoyed that Baker has received the largest suspension in a decade for a bump that was not seen.
(1) honest and intelligent football supporters who realize that Baker was seemingly hard done by to receive 7 weeks for a bump when there are no witnesses or cameras;
(2) pathetic one-eyed biased (non-Fremantle) supporters who don't like Baker and lack the necessary intelligence to form an opinion based on common sense;
(3) Fremantle supporters angry that their player has been struck and care not for facts (and whose opinion is therefore irrelevant); and
(4) St.Kilda supporters (myself included) who are also biased and are no doubt annoyed that Baker has received the largest suspension in a decade for a bump that was not seen.
Damn, you're still at it?
Oh look and so are you. 13 yr old Hypocrite.
- Status