- Joined
- Apr 2, 2000
- Posts
- 77,335
- Reaction score
- 26,671
- Location
- Perth, Australia
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
Not sold on Higuain either.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Chelsea could just sell Lukaku and buy him back if he ever develops into a world-class striker. Similar to what happened with Matic. It might not be best business practice but with Chelsea's bottomless pit of money it's no big deal.
Regarding Reus, the thing I'd like to know is well why not? I understand through most of the other years we haven't had United/Chelsea money so we bought youth and developed them but this year we can afford Reus, who is a proven jet, so why not attempt to sign him? He is only 25 so he isn't breaking the age barrier, and we know he is good so why not? If we can afford too then we should go for it.When was the last time we actually signed a big name player? I honestly couldnt tell you. Under Rafa, all his best buys were more obscure. Mascherano was highly rated I guess but everybody seemed to be wary of him because he was not even getting a game at West Ham. Alonso was plying his trade at Real Sociedad, he wasnt touted as a major signing even though he did turn out to be one.
Torres was rated high I guess, but when we bought him, I didnt think every club under the sun was jealous. We werent fighting off Barca, Madrid, United etc for his signature. He turned into the best striker on the planet for about 2 years though.
Ummm... Suarez wasnt really sought after. Just another good player padding his stats in the poor Dutch league. Of course he turned into a superstar.
We really dont tend to go for the big name signings, like Chelsea or United do. Or now City and even lately Arsenal. We tend to go the more obscure route and then turn them into stars. So I think if you are waiting for us to sign somebody like Reus, you might be waiting a long time.
Hapless? Haha, what?Mourinho's judgement has slipped big time. Last year he offloaded De Bruyne and Mata while bringing in the hapless Willian. Lukaku could have been a good option for him too. Losing Mata's creativity hurt them when they dropped points to teams down near the bottom of the table.
If Willian was average then De Bruyne was disgracefully bad.Calling him "hapless" was harsh .A more accurate term would be average. Nice for a counter attacking scheme ,bit overall I dont rate him.
Should have given De Bruyne more chances .
Chelsea came home empty handed at the end of the season. I think Mata would have made the difference in the league .
Heard he was going out on a season loan I believe. Magath really isn't a fan haha.
More idiocy. Why let a manager blow a heap on a player just to sack him a few days later.
Would any decent PL striker want to drop back to the Championship though?
City have signed Willy. Also known as pants 2.0
If Hart gets dropped then you won't have a single English player in your starting XI!big willy will make many more appearances than pants. pelle's a big fan and you get the impression he isn't completely sold on hartdog
And that's why they are a title contender!If Hart gets dropped then you won't have a single English player in your starting XI!
At least the early 2000's Arsenal teams had Cole and Campbell.as an australian this really means nothing
I'm fully Australian but I do have a slight preference for English players. Maybe that's because English players are a part of the fabric of Liverpool.as an australian this really means nothing
Explains why Leeds asked so much for it.
Magath wasn't the manager when he was signed.