Team subforums?

[Kerrby]

No wonder you are brainless.

Does that mean EBIAC is brainless too you ****wit?

 

[Ljp86]

Don't need subforums, will take too many threads away from the main board. Quite a few teams don't really have the activity for their own personal board anyway.

 

[BILC]

I think i speak for all the Furies in saying that we prefer to have our team thread on the Richmond board...

 

[Fred]

Bad idea, won't happen.

 

[boncer34]

Thats that then.

 

[Biggie]

No thanks.

 

[rfctigerarmy]

I think i speak for all the Furies in saying that we prefer to have our team thread on the Richmond board...

Yep, exactly right.

 

[Perth Swans]

Don't really mind.. I voted yes, it would be alright I suppose..

 

[StatsFanatic]

Sub forums are needed as some of the Team threads for hidden of the 2nd page due to inactiveness and makes the team even more inactive as it's harder to find there team thread

 

[boncer34]

Tow the party line Stats.

 

[15Petterd15]

1. do you really think administartors would make subforums for just a little game which 20-30 people are active on.
2. none of that shit of match bans
3. we are doing fine as it is