Remove this Banner Ad

Test opener position

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel B
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who should open the batting with David Warner?

  • Cameron Bancroft

    Votes: 11 14.9%
  • Matt Renshaw

    Votes: 26 35.1%
  • Joe Burns

    Votes: 30 40.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 7 9.5%

  • Total voters
    74

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Posts
852
Reaction score
960
AFL Club
Sydney
Commentators today suggested Cameron Bancroft has one more chance (if he's lucky) to earn his place on the South Africa tour. But who to replace him?

Renshaw was dropped due to poor form at Shield level, and previous incumbent Joe Burns has not done much to push his case.

So who should it be?
 
Hard to see them going back to renshaw that soon but maybe burns would be in the running, he really didn't have a very long run of bad form he was averaging 40 and had just come off a man of the match performance in nz when he had a couple of poor games in SL.

Outside of two very poor games in SL he averages 44 with three tons considering we are going to SA you would think those stats mean more than his two poor games in asia.
 
Burns made a 103 and 202* in his last 2 matches before hit-and-giggle came in. Can't say I watched him in either match but assuming he's actually worked on his technique and that's why he scored well (not just good pitch + below par bowlers) wouldn't be unhappy to see him back in.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

You know both Marshs are already in the test side, right?

Could recall Geoff I guess.

Rather than blooding yet another opener you give an opportunity to a middle order player by elevating Shaun to the top of the order.
 
I was disappointed we didn't go with Renshaw in the first couple of tests.

Yeah he hadn't made runs in the Shield games so the thinking was that he might carry that poor form into the tests. Sure, he might have.

But what if he didn't? What if he's one of those players who can step up to the occasion? Who has a temperament and game that can stand up to the pressures of test cricket.

We'd already seen him make runs in that arena.

We went for the form Shield player to replace him - fine. But he was unproven at the level so a leap into the unknown.

If Renshaw had failed in the first test or two Bancroft was there making runs as a Plan B.

It was a preemptive break up!
 
Burns made a 103 and 202* in his last 2 matches before hit-and-giggle came in. Can't say I watched him in either match but assuming he's actually worked on his technique and that's why he scored well (not just good pitch + below par bowlers) wouldn't be unhappy to see him back in.

Kerry O'Keefe was saying on radio today he still has the EXACT same problem Bancroft does (confronts the ball at an angle therefore has to play around his front pad, etc). Very frustrating. If there are batting coaches at national and state levels you really do wonder wtf they are doing these days.
 
Khawaja
Marsh at 3
Maxwell at 5

Burns isn't an opener no matter what everyone else thinks

Renshaw obviously isn't happening. Awful form and it would be the selectors admitting they got it wrong.
God no.

Maxwell can go back to club cricket.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

This is a very difficult call, whoever it is out of Renshaw, Bancroft and Burns though I'm not expecting to average more than 20 in the 4 test series of South Africa.
 
This is a very difficult call, whoever it is out of Renshaw, Bancroft and Burns though I'm not expecting to average more than 20 in the 4 test series of South Africa.
In that case would you consider shifting Usman to open and bring Handscomb back into the middle order?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I was disappointed we didn't go with Renshaw in the first couple of tests.

Yeah he hadn't made runs in the Shield games so the thinking was that he might carry that poor form into the tests. Sure, he might have.

But what if he didn't? What if he's one of those players who can step up to the occasion? Who has a temperament and game that can stand up to the pressures of test cricket.

We'd already seen him make runs in that arena.

We went for the form Shield player to replace him - fine. But he was unproven at the level so a leap into the unknown.

If Renshaw had failed in the first test or two Bancroft was there making runs as a Plan B.

It was a preemptive break up!

C'mon mate, time to let it go.

There was no way known Renshaw could be selected for an ashes series with the horrendous form he was in during the opening shield matches.

Banners deserved his chance, looked promising early but clearly has a fundamental flaw in his technique. If he's getting exposed on our roads by Anderson and Broad, then Steyn, Morkel n co would eat him alive.

Renshaw might bounce back but like Bancroft needs to go away and hone his craft for a while. There's no way he's getting selected to play in SA.
 
In that case would you consider shifting Usman to open and bring Handscomb back into the middle order?

This would be the logical move. Smith to 3 and Maxy, Handscomb or someone else to the middle order. Smith may as well bat 3 coz he'll be coming in at 2 fa fcuk all anyway most innings.
 
Tough choices. Could put Marsh to open and bat Burns at 5 but I'm loathe to move Marsh after a good summer. Burns has had a great Shield season but do we want to open with him. So it's a case of f'ed if i know.
 
Commentators today suggested Cameron Bancroft has one more chance (if he's lucky) to earn his place on the South Africa tour. But who to replace him?

Renshaw was dropped due to poor form at Shield level, and previous incumbent Joe Burns has not done much to push his case.

So who should it be?
Burns hasn't done much? Third highest run scorer in the shield so far. More than 500 runs, two hundreds and two fifties, average 57. Not sure what else you think he needs to do?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom