Saintly Viewed
.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2015
- Posts
- 48,085
- Reaction score
- 39,990
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
.that horse bolted long time agoOnly now?
Basically now I see certain posters I just glance and move on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

.that horse bolted long time agoOnly now?
First answer noFact.
Second that wasn't a problem for Malthouse at the time, not a game they couldn't win according to him. Spin it anyway you want but after that statement he shouldn't be taken serious anymore.
This season maybe next if there is a positive trend.Genuine question to the believers..
How long do you give Bucks? How many seasons before you say.. that's enough!?
And what are your expectations this year and next?
Theories don't become facts because you write "fact" at the end of it.
Fact
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
When you ask seriously I'm happy to answer.Genuine question to the believers..
How long do you give Bucks? How many seasons before you say.. that's enough!?
And what are your expectations this year and next?
Just a general inquiry, do AFL laws prohibit recruiting of staff during the season (or at least from fellow clubs)? Say if Bucks was sacked (fingers crossed), would Collingwood be able to launch a mid-season contract to someone like Brett Ratten (for example)? Or is that now allowed
This season maybe next if there is a positive trend.
When you ask seriously I'm happy to answer.
When you look like you are clowning around eg "the believers," it's not worth bothering to answer.
This club is not a sect or cult. Though there is some fantastical disposition.
It's not a disaster, it's just not good enough.The present is the cause of that. It's a disaster!
No it's definitely allowed... just depends whether or not you need the other clubs approval first. (either officially or implied... but most clubs I think would be accepting if it's someone moving up into a higher role).
It's common for assistants to be poached from a club mid finals-series, the majority of whom then immediately leave their current club and move to their new employer.
This would be no different, given that the season isn't officially finished at that stage.
I will let you know at the end of the season what would have been acceptable given the circumstances.So let's say we finish 11th this year and 9th next year?
Is that acceptable in 5/6 years..?
I could theorise why we became a powerful club again but I would probably need some facts first.Well u tell me why we became a powerful club again.
Are you thinking that the timing of the farewell was the final FU to Ed and the club?
Read my post. Ed is responsible for installing the current coach and his system.
Just throwing this question out there...
Does anybody in this board actually think Bucks will turn this around and make the finals?
I think he has no chance.
I could theorise why we became a powerful club again but I would probably need some facts first.
All involved in the football side of things have to turn it around.
I'm leaning towards missing finals but I've felt that way since before the real stuff started.
I actually reckon we are still a chance if we can turn 5/3 after round 8 obviously only dropping to WC in Perth.
The big IF is if Buckley releases the shackles and simplifies the game he wants the players to play, this team is capable of playing some really really good footy and I think that in a lot of ways Bucks is his own worst enemy and tries to re-invent the wheel by over thinking the game and trying to implement that on the players.
It's not a disaster, it's just not good enough.
Spoons are disaster (we have two too many too)
And he escapes without anyone saying thr Succession Plan might of Failed badly
Just throwing this question out there...
Does anybody in this board actually think Bucks will turn this around and make the finals?
I think he has no chance.
No. There are the panic merchants and level headed ones. Just because we don't cave in doesn't mean we don't have doubts. I believe that the season only just started and it has been very disappointing. Bucks got 19 matches to make things right.It wasn't clowning around there are 2 definitive groups.. the doubters and believers.
Apologies if it came off that way.
For what it is worth I see no benefit in terminating Bucks contract this year. He should be given the year to turn things around. If as expected we miss the finals there needs to be an independent review of all aspects of the football department. Evidence from the review would then be used as a basis for decisions moving forward. The review should be conducted by experts with no affiliation with the club.
I would but rehashing events that occured 5 years ago in order to validate points now, seems kind of pointless.Off u go then, that can be your homework for tonight.

