SJ
Premium Platinum
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Roddick v El Aynaoui went 4:59 for 21-19 in the fifth in 2003.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The 3rd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
- Thread starter CHBench
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
I wouldnt have a clue but if i had to guess Roddick Vs El Anaoui went for ages. Was back in 2003 from memory
I wouldnt have a clue but if i had to guess Roddick Vs El Anaoui went for ages. Was back in 2003 from memory
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Muller vs Lopez earlier this tournament was 5 hours 45 min I think (or was it 4 hours?)... so the 5th set must be an absolute epic to beat that.
Muller vs Lopez earlier this tournament was 5 hours 45 min I think (or was it 4 hours?)... so the 5th set must be an absolute epic to beat that.
SJ
Premium Platinum
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
It was under five, there was an error made initially in the results recorded.
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
I was wondering why ESPN were saying this is the longest match of the fortnight. Didn't know there was an error in the Round 1 match
SJ
Premium Platinum
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Here's a stat.
Break point conversions and chances:
Nadal 3/15
Verdasco 2/4
Quite extraordinary numbers considering the score.
Here's a stat.
Break point conversions and chances:
Nadal 3/15
Verdasco 2/4
Quite extraordinary numbers considering the score.
- Nov 28, 2006
- 28,877
- 11,950
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
This is an amazing match. My power went out for an hour so I had to listen to the radio.
This is an amazing match. My power went out for an hour so I had to listen to the radio.
- May 10, 2004
- 24,853
- 5,697
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
I sense that Verdasco is just about spent here....
I sense that Verdasco is just about spent here....
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Woah 97 winners from Verdasco.
Woah 97 winners from Verdasco.
- May 10, 2004
- 24,853
- 5,697
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
As I say that, goes for a winner out wide and nails it
As I say that, goes for a winner out wide and nails it
SJ
Premium Platinum
- May 10, 2004
- 24,853
- 5,697
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Fair dinkum every time Verdasco looks like he's just about finished, he keeps finding something. Astonishing tennis!
Fair dinkum every time Verdasco looks like he's just about finished, he keeps finding something. Astonishing tennis!
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
And here we go. 0-30.
Verdasco was just about spent early in the fourth, when Jim Courier, one of, if not the, most knowledgeable sports commentators I've heard, said that 'Rafa will win this match unless he injures himself', obviously implying that he would win it fairly easily in the fourth set.
And here we go. 0-30.
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
god damn!
god damn!
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Ridiculous point!!!
Ridiculous point!!!
- May 10, 2004
- 24,853
- 5,697
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Pistons/Hammers/Sri Lanka/The Exers
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
Can Verdasco find more reserves in the tank?
Can Verdasco find more reserves in the tank?
SJ
Premium Platinum
Re: The 2nd Official 2009 Australian Open Thread
This could be it. But then again he's got himself out of trouble every time before.
This could be it. But then again he's got himself out of trouble every time before.