Space tourism is coming along pretty quickly so that should answer things quickly. Or is that not to be trusted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Problem is simple test have been done every day, something is messed up. Something is not right surely us round Earthers can see this.Once again, the authenticity of the videos needs to be questioned - there are some simple means for explaining the apparent lack of a curvature.
The sheer size of our planet, when weighed up against the limited scope of human sight, is the most obvious one.
Problem is simple test have been done every day, something is messed up. Something is not right surely us round Earthers can see this.
Am I saying the Earth is flat? Nope
Have they been feeding you rubbish since school? Highly probable.
The entire theory of a globe earth is rooted in observable science. We apparently have the full diameter/circumference of a globe earth, and the mathematical formula to determine curvature. Yet nothing ever holds up to these simple tests here on Earth. You cannot just trust images from space, and what NASA tells you. If you're basing your entire faith in that as vindication of globe earth proof, then who's the idiot or buying crap. Your own observable testing never shows curvature. So going off all mankind can do outside of trusting space programs who have been shown to lie....all we can do is test ourselves from our very own planet. And it never shows. There's credence to a flat earth theory therefore. Simple.Oh it's highly likely some of what we learned as kids isn't true, or is a skewed perspective - but on this subject? It seems like a conspiracy for the sake of it, one with a great many holes too.
The entire theory of a globe earth is rooted in observable science. We apparently have the full diameter/circumference of a globe earth, and the mathematical formula to determine curvature. Yet nothing ever holds up to these simple tests here on Earth. You cannot just trust images from space, and what NASA tells you. If you're basing your entire faith in that as vindication of globe earth proof, then who's the idiot or buying crap. Your own observable testing never shows curvature. So going off all mankind can do outside of trusting space programs who have been shown to lie....all we can do is test ourselves from our very own planet. And it never shows. There's credence to a flat earth theory therefore. Simple.
Absolutely flat Earth has its flaws, that's why I am not a flat Earther. But what flat has done is open up Pandora's box on to the round Earth model. Which now I highly doubt it's authenticity as is accepted in the world today. The fact that Antarctica is a mystery to this day which should give you a clue they are willing to lie and deceive you.Oh it's highly likely some of what we learned as kids isn't true, or is a skewed perspective - but on this subject? It seems like a conspiracy for the sake of it, one with a great many holes too.
I'm damaged now where everytime I hear Adele, instead I think of this....(which I must admit, was a damn good rendition and nice lyrical adaption)...
(WATCH THE *ingG VIDEO)
Absolutely flat Earth has its flaws, that's why I am not a flat Earther. But what flat has done is open up Pandora's box on to the round Earth model. Which now I highly doubt it's authenticity as is accepted in the world today. The fact that Antarctica is a mystery to this day which should give you a clue they are willing to lie and deceive you.
I am happy for flat Earthers to continue to probe this subject because they are more likely to get to the truth than some who just accepts the clear rubbish NASA and science feed us.
You say this with such conviction, yet you can't tell me a damn thing about Antarctica.I don't think there's any Pandora's Box here. Flat Earth Theory has popped up more due to ignorance of science and in some cases, a desire to combine pseudo-science with religion. Whatever flaws may exist in our current models of the earth, are insignificant compared to the painful flaws in FE theory, and certainly not enough to warrant throwing out those existing models in favour of ???.
This is a problem - people want to see conspiracies where there are none. It's fashionable to 'question the establishment', but this has led to questioning - and hampering - scientific endeavour (since people conflate politics and science these days). This is why we've had the science marches recently - it's a reaction to the way in which armchair scientists and conspiracy theorists baffle and confuse with gobbledegook. They've had enough and are pushing back against this sort of nonsense, and rightly so.
You say this with such conviction, yet you can't tell me a damn thing about Antarctica.
This is no conspiracy it's guarded and you are not allowed to go past certain points.
Can you explain how rainbows form?
There are several groups who completed a full traverse of Antarctica unsupported. All of the 1,100 miles of it.
Here is one
http://www.spear17.org/
https://www.soldierscharity.org/spear17-complete-epic-1100-mile-expedition-antarctica/
These are are all private groups have connections to NASA or any US government entity.
Plenty of people have done Antarctic expeditions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Antarctic_expeditions
Then recently Mike horn completed a full traverse from north to south (Pole2pole) without falling of the edge LOL
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Horn
You say this with such conviction, yet you can't tell me a damn thing about Antarctica.
This is no conspiracy it's guarded and you are not allowed to go past certain points.
News reports telling you a view of a whole city is a mirage because their round Earth maths doesn't add up. This is not a conspiracy this happened.
Scientist are the guys who pretend to be open and honest but you get shown the door, reputation tarnished, if people who are much smarter than you and I, dare question the possibility of certain thing being wrong. There is no chance to prove anything right or wrong with this tow in line.
Many scientist in history labeled crazy spouting gobbledegook only to proven right years later. Its a fine one between crazy and genius. I see no different here.
Does this mean the flat Earthers are right?
absolutely not,
But if I was choosing sides to seek the truth on how the world works I choose the people who continue to question over the "nothing to see here I am satisfied let's troll them" crowd.
Its funny though ancient civilisation thought the world was flat, yet some were geniuses at maths and architecture.
Can you explain how rainbows form?
Yes....Usually after a shower of rain.
For starters Antarctica is 14,000,000km2
Secondly no one has fully explored Antarctica only way to see it all is through satellite images. Surprise surprise Google Earth has 3 million square miles of it at a very low blurry resolution.
Thirdly Under the Antarctica treaty there are 16 restricted areas you can't go to due to "scientific" and "environmental" value. Governed and overseen by 32 nations. Just look at the artic region restrictions to see the difference.
Those damn scientist restricting stuff again. You can f*** up anything else in the world, bomb the hell out of any country dump rubbish into that ocean let the lawless run riot but the minute you step into Antarctica that stuff just doesnt fly.
And lastly I didn't bring up Antarctica to prove flat Earth as I will say again I don't believe in it.
Only brought it up to make the point how science and government agencies lie and distort the truth Which people eat up as kosher. And why I side with people who want to question what they are told (even though I might not agree with their premise), and not swallow it.
No, clearly you don't understand how rainbows are formed.
Unaltered image taken from 18,000 km by the (unmanned) Apollo 4 flight in November 1967:So while you've decided to waltz on in and hurl your moron calling insult,maybe you can explain why NASA feels the need to doctor all the images of round ball earth?
Unaltered image taken from 18,000 km by the (unmanned) Apollo 4 flight in November 1967:
No one is touching her mark anytime soon. When she returns home, in September, she will have logged 666 days in space.