Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

[darthbards]

53 pages now the NASA fan boyz have had to offer proof their theories are fact and they have given us nothing,yet they dare to illogically accuse others of being trolls based on certain rules that govern their religion of science.

 

[cannot]

53 pages now the NASA fan boyz have had to offer proof their theories are fact and they have given us nothing,yet they dare to illogically accuse others of being trolls based on certain rules that govern their religion of science.

you mean proof that we live on a giant ball, tiled back Spinning, Rotating, Revolving & Wobbling

- @ 1000 mph around its central axis
- traveling 67000 mph , circles around the sun
- spiraling 500000 mph around the milky way
- while the galaxy goes 670000000 mph thur the universe

all originating from the society of jesus big bang theory, apparently 14 billion years ago

grand total of 670, 568, 000 mph in several different directions simultaneously *

you just cant see, feel, hear, measure or prove any of it ..

is that the kind of thing you are referring to ? there might not be proof but do we really need proof? it seems to be the consensus so maybe lets just go with that

have you ever opened a physics book??






* without introducing the new scientific theory thats been presented that our galaxy could be moving away from, or, the distance between, is

growing faster than the speed of light. due to just scientific claims rustling a certain globers jimmies

 

[darthbards]

you mean proof that we live on a giant ball, tiled back Spinning, Rotating, Revolving & Wobbling

@ 1000 mph around its centeral axis

traveling 67000 mph , circles around the sun

spiraling 500000 mph around the milky way

while the galaxay goes 670000000 mph thur the universe

all originating from the society of jesus big bang 14 billion years ago

grand total of 670, 568, 000 mph in several different directions simultaneously


you just cant see, feel, hear, measure or proof any of it

is that the kind of thing you are referring to ? there might not be proof but do we really need proof? it seems to be the consciousness so maybe lets just go with that

Yep that's the stuff.
It actually sounds like the sort of thing you might need a computer programme to run now that I think about it.

 

[CJApples87]

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-t...14-ways-the-flat-earth-theory-is-false.t7148/

cannot Go through this page and give us your opinion on it. This was conveniently forgotten by you, probably because it shows you what you choose not to believe.

 

[cannot]

cannot Go through this page and give us your opinion on it. This was conveniently forgotten by you, probably because it shows you what you choose not to believe.

yeah ill read it

is it as good as snoopes?

 

[CJApples87]

yeah ill read it

is it as good as snoopes?

It's much better than 'snoopes'.

 

[Dwhale44]

nasa has never produced any photo of the earth that they don't openly admit is unedited.

Does an aeroplane fly with its nose slightly down for a reason, or fly completley level and eventually into outerspace?

 

[Total Power]

The thread is based around a flat earth or flat earth theories. I propose the world is flat,and being simulated as round by the creator of the simulation.

And yet your entire argument is based on something with zero evidence behind it, if you dont see this as hypocritical then you are blind, which is why i said you are a troll, you discard evidence/proof cause it doesnt suit your fundamentalist belief system, no point argument with you, you can talk to yourself and entertain yourself in your delusional world.

 

[Reppie]

 

[darthbards]

And yet your entire argument is based on something with zero evidence behind it, if you dont see this as hypocritical then you are blind, which is why i said you are a troll, you discard evidence/proof cause it doesnt suit your fundamentalist belief system, no point argument with you, you can talk to yourself and entertain yourself in your delusional world.

Who cares what every scientist from the religion of science says. They do not have proof about many things. There is also evidence or reasons why the universe is simulated. If you don't agree with the reasons,fine,but prove the current religion of science theories true. If the religion of science cannot prove their theories,as fact,other theories can be presented.
- The big bang can be explained by Sims. First there was nothing,then there was something. The loading of the simulation would be your magical big bang
- Quantum mechanics can be explained by Sims theory.
- Fine tuning can be explained by Sims.
- The emptiness of space can be explained by Sims. The empty space could be a way of saving on processing power.
- We know DNA is code. Why not if we go even smaller the entire universe is code.
- We can already create virtual worlds ourselves,who says we cannot develop these worlds further and create our own universes. If we can create our own universe it's possible someone has created this universe
- Sims explains Deja vu as a possible 'kink' in the simulation,this could be correct and there could be other kinks.
- Sims theory would explain a God or creator. A God has been suggested for centuries while never disproven.
- Mathamatic,the universe appears to be based around maths,a computer code would explain this as it to would be based around math.

The thread is based around a flat earth or flat earth theories. I propose the world is flat,and being simulated as round by the creator of the simulation.

i supplied evidence,here it is again seeing you must have missed.

 

[Total Power]

i supplied evidence,here it is again seeing you must have missed.

What evidence is that, i have a better evidence, everything can be explained by "God". I win.

I dont even think you understand what evidence is. Making a claim is not proof/evidence. Claim would be "big bang can be explained by god hypothesis" .Which is why i think you dont even understand the very basics of science, so off you go

 

[Reppie]

So, my dear flat earth nutters.

Pray tell what the reason behind the huge conspiracy to suppress the inevitable truth that the earth is flat, is? What is the end-game?

Sad you would need to ask that question if you had done any research into the topic.

 

[darthbards]

What evidence is that, i have a better evidence, everything can be explained by "God". I win.

I dont even think you understand what evidence is. Making a claim is not proof/evidence. Claim would be "big bang can be explained by god hypothesis" .Which is why i think you dont even understand the very basics of science, so off you go

You wanted evidence,I supplied evidence. I don't have to follow your religious view of evidence,if you don't like my evidence to bad,prove your evidence that the universe isn't a simulation.

If you want to make it a contest,no one wins until there is proof. Evidence is just that,neither of us has provided proof. This means both theories are possible.

 

[Reppie]

Another good point while researching the topic is meteor craters.
Always perfectly round.
Strange that any object could enter the earth at a perfectly 90 degree angle considering the speed we are supposedly speeding through space.
There would have to be an impact angle you would think 45 degrees at least.
And at a stretch how is the meteor out traveling the speed of the earth.

 

[Total Power]

You wanted evidence,I supplied evidence. I don't have to follow your religious view of evidence,if you don't like my evidence to bad,prove your evidence that the universe isn't a simulation.

If you want to make it a contest,no one wins until there is proof. Evidence is just that,neither of us has provided proof. This means both theories are possible.

Nah, that is not evidence. Definition of evidence "the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid."You made a series of claims, which i did too by saying "god did it" to fit my hypothesis.You also made a series of strawman assumptions to fit the "evidence", Here is my question to you, prove that the universe is fine tuned, considering we barely know whats outside of our solar system, making an open ended statement doesnt make you look very intelligent. For the last time i am asking you, prove me i am wrong that a pink unicorn didnt create us.

 

[CJApples87]

Another good point while researching the topic is meteor craters.
Always perfectly round.
Strange that any object could enter the earth at a perfectly 90 degree angle considering the speed we are supposedly speeding through space.
There would have to be an impact angle you would think 45 degrees at least.
And at a stretch how is the meteor out traveling the speed of the earth.

Perfectly round? The tiniest bit of research shows that it utterly ridiculous.

They don't necessarily go at a faster speed than the Earth, they're in different trajectories. Most come in at substantial angles.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[darthbards]

Nah, that is not evidence. Definition of evidence "the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid."You made a series of claims, which i did too by saying "god did it" to fit my hypothesis.You also made a series of strawman assumptions to fit the "evidence", Here is my question to you, prove that the universe is fine tuned, considering we barely know whats outside of our solar system, making an open ended statement doesnt make you look very intelligent. For the last time i am asking you, prove me i am wrong that a pink unicorn didnt create us.

Call them what you will. This is not a science forum,I do not have to follow your religion of science rules regarding my evidence.
Prove your evidence that the universe is not a simulation as fact.
Prove my evidence regarding the universe being a simulation is impossible using fact.

You do know there is a science board where your religious views regarding evidence will be met with far more open arms?

 

[darthbards]

Perfectly round? The tiniest bit of research shows that it utterly ridiculous.

They don't necessarily go at a faster speed than the Earth, they're in different trajectories. Most come in at substantial angles.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They appear perfectly round to me.

 

[Reppie]

Perfectly round? The tiniest bit of research shows that it utterly ridiculous.

They don't necessarily go at a faster speed than the Earth, they're in different trajectories. Most come in at substantial angles.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Plese tell me your not serious.
Wheres the impact angle.
Or your trolling.

 

[CJApples87]

I watched the first ten minutes of that, and since I don't have a further 90 minutes to waste please enlighten me as to how it explains sunrises and sunsets, how it explains that on a flat earth we should be able to see the sun at ALL times because the world is flat and the sun is huge and how satellites and GPS work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Total Power]

Call them what you will. This is not a science forum,I do not have to follow your religion of science rules regarding my evidence.
Prove your evidence that the universe is not a simulation as fact.
Prove my evidence regarding the universe being a simulation is impossible using fact.

You do know there is a science board where your religious views regarding evidence will be met with far more open arms?

You said you have "evidence". I called you out on that, your statement doesnt fit the criteria of evidence. Make a deductive claim is not evidence. Prove alien seeding is wrong, prove pink unicorn is wrong, heck prove god wrong, prove we are not here by accident, etc etc. You cannot do any or all, you cannot disprove me. So asking me to disprove a certain "claim" is a strawman and your argument is based on strawman, not evidence. I called you out on that, dont blame me, your argument boils down to the same claim as religious fundies "god did it" or "sims did it" in your case. Sorry that is not very intellligent, you got nothing in the end, but thats ok but dont bring this rubbish outside of the conspiracy board

 

[CJApples87]

Plese tell me your not serious.
Wheres the impact angle.
Or your trolling.

Trolling about what? You said they're perfectly round. Meteors hit the Earth by crossing the trajectory of the Earth not because that magically catch up to it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CJApples87]

They appear perfectly round to me.

Then you may seriously want to get your eyes checked if you think they're perfectly round.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Reppie]

I watched the first ten minutes of that, and since I don't have a further 90 minutes to waste please enlighten me as to how it explains sunrises and sunsets, how it explains that on a flat earth we should be able to see the sun at ALL times because the world is flat and the sun is huge and how satellites and GPS work.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They sun and moon are no where are far away as we are told.
So they act as a spotlight in an area.
And just dissappear out of sight when they move out of sight.
Seeing how you dont have time to watch the video why bother posting?
You must have better things to do obviously.

 

[Reppie]

Trolling about what? You said they're perfectly round. Meteors hit the Earth by crossing the trajectory of the Earth not because that magically catch up to it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where are they coming from then?