Conspiracy Theory The Moon landing - 40 years on

[exe ex machina]

Yeah still dont buy it. No way they could communicate thru all that magnetic atmospheres and 300 KMs of space. They only could if they were in a studio set.

 

[Father Jack]

Yeah still dont buy it. No way they could communicate thru all that magnetic atmospheres and 300 KMs of space. They only could if they were in a studio set.

how deep have you looked into it?

 

[exe ex machina]

how deep have you looked into it?

Not very, i just dont buy it given i believe the moon landing was faked anyway, so everything else around it then

 

[Father Jack]

sounds dangerously like confirmation bias to me

 

[Wallaby]

Not very, i just dont buy it given i believe the moon landing was faked anyway, so everything else around it then

In other words:

'I don't understand the science behind it, so rather than try and edumacate myself, I'll just say if I don't get it, it didn't happen'.

 

[exe ex machina]

The "educators" meanwhile not eager to be educated

 

[Zidane98]

Severe underestimating of the actual distance between Earth and the Moon going on here.

mathematical equations & factual information has never been rated highly amongst the CT nutter community.

 

[exe ex machina]

Buzz Aldrin flat out says the moon landing didnt happen

 

[Father Jack]

Just post the bit where he flat out says the moon landings didn't happen please.

 

[Wallaby]

You are really reaching now, GG.

Those videos basically debunk themselves.

 

[exe ex machina]

Buzz bit in the first video. Its like halfway thru or so. The entire video is like 3 min long sheesh if you cant watch thru it to see the Bizz bit.

 

[Father Jack]

Buzz bit in the first video. Its like halfway thru or so. The entire video is like 3 min long sheesh if you cant watch thru it to see the Bizz bit.

If it needs explaining then Buzz didn't flat out say the moon landings were faked so therefore I don't need to waste any time watching those videos. Tell me, did the fact your previous point (about the photos being impossible to have been taken from the moon) getting totally debunked make you reconsider your position at all?

 

[exe ex machina]

But you're happy to waste your time responding to something you didn't watch.

 

[Zidane98]

But you're happy to waste your time responding to something you didn't watch.

Honest question - are there any conspiracy theories you don't believe?

 

[exe ex machina]

Honest question - are there any conspiracy theories you don't believe?

Are there any that you believe?

 

[Zidane98]

Are there any that you believe?

The real ones like Watergate, mukden etc etc. Any conspiracy theory that has been confirmed by supporting evidence and sound logic really.



Are there any conspiracy theories you do not believe?

 

[Father Jack]

But you're happy to waste your time responding to something you didn't watch.

I don't give a shit about the video, I just want to see where the following occurs:

Buzz Aldrin flat out says the moon landing didnt happen

 

[CD Xbow]

Are there any that you believe?

GG this is one you shouldn't believe. It's as stupid as the flat earth theory. The old Apollo hardware has been imaged on the moon and there are masses of third party evidence:

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This is a conspiracy mostly based on the fact that people don't understand photographs look different on reflective planetary surface without an atmosphere. It is one of the dumbest conspiracies, because it is so easily disproved and given the enormous scope of the conspiracy some good evidence and credible witnesses would have come forward.

WRT to your comments earlier about communication - this is untrue. Everyday tons of data is sent from probes, landers and rovers throughout the solar system to Earth without problems (barring times of solar storms) and commands are sent back to them, again without problem.

 

[mr bagcroft]

GG this is one you shouldn't believe. It's as stupid as the flat earth theory. The old Apollo hardware has been imaged on the moon and there are masses of third party evidence:

Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

This is a conspiracy mostly based on the fact that people don't understand photographs look different on reflective planetary surface without an atmosphere. It is one of the dumbest conspiracies, because it is so easily disproved and given the enormous scope of the conspiracy some good evidence and credible witnesses would have come forward.

WRT to your comments earlier about communication - this is untrue. Everyday tons of data is sent from probes, landers and rovers throughout the solar system to Earth without problems (barring times of solar storms) and commands are sent back to them, again without problem.

lol, really?
Photo debunikng is based on no atmosphere and reflections? lol.
Show me where this is proven. Or even possible.
How about the film and cameras surviving the enormous cold, heat and radiation?
Jesus Christ.

 

[rank and file]

lol, really?
Photo debunikng is based on no atmosphere and reflections? lol.
Show me where this is proven. Or even possible.
How about the film and cameras surviving the enormous cold, heat and radiation?
Jesus Christ.

This article answers a few questions about the film and cameras used.
https://www.npr.org/2019/07/13/735314929/the-camera-that-went-to-the-moon-and-changed-how-we-see-it

 

[CD Xbow]

lol, really?
Photo debunikng is based on no atmosphere and reflections? lol.
Show me where this is proven. Or even possible.
How about the film and cameras surviving the enormous cold, heat and radiation?
Jesus Christ.

Yes, it is. Multiple shadows are cast from the intense surface reflection. These are unusually sharp over distance because of the lack of atmosphere. The intensity of the suns light is the reason you don't see stars. Simple atmospheric physics explains about 90% of the so called anomalies.

Film cameras seem to have survived the heat and cold of orbit, the cold of the Martian surface and even the extreme heat of Venus, if only briefly. They also had to survive that radiation you mention to get to those places. And they did.

You are beyond help If you don't believe the Yanks went to the moon A better conspiracy, and one which there could be a kernal of truth in, is did they see anything anomalous?

 

[exe ex machina]

The real ones like Watergate, mukden etc etc. Any conspiracy theory that has been confirmed by supporting evidence and sound logic really.



Are there any conspiracy theories you do not believe?

Off the top of my head.....Dont believe in aliens, ufos, reptilian shapeshifting humanoids. Sont believe in qanon, or gesara, type revolutions for world good. Dont believe in parallel or multiverses. Dont believe in time travel. Dont believe in simulation theory. Dont believe in the missing link.

 

[Wallaby]

If there were two light sources - every object would cast 2 shadows.

 

[Wallaby]

Off the top of my head.....Dont believe in aliens, ufos, reptilian shapeshifting humanoids. Sont believe in qanon, or gesara, type revolutions for world good. Dont believe in parallel or multiverses. Dont believe in time travel. Dont believe in simulation theory. Dont believe in the missing link.

I don't think anyone believes in the missing link.

 

[bourbons]

View attachment 1599397

I mean.. I'm sure telcos could rig up some state of the art radio wave based ultra long range telecommunications equipment to run their consumer networks on if they wanted to. Not sure how many customers they'd have though seeing as we'd be paying about $78 per call.