Remove this Banner Ad

The on topic thread 4.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jatz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yawn. If you don't know, then don't post. You seem to post just for the sake of it.
I posted because I think decision making by officials is inconsistent, and rule changes, while that inconsistency exists won't be effective.

If wouldnt have thought that was too hard a concept for you to understand but when you're desperate to be contrarian and controversial I guess it's a bit tough.
 
I posted because I think decision making by officials is inconsistent, and rule changes, while that inconsistency exists won't be effective.

If wouldnt have thought that was too hard a concept for you to understand but when you're desperate to be contrarian and controversial I guess it's a bit tough.
So posting what you did doesn't do that at all. Seriously...

My post made perfect sense and addressed your nonsense.
 
Basically you either go with any part of the body in front, or whole body in front. I prefer the first personally

When they draw the lines for VAR we will end up having the same issues, just a metre forward.

Most games do not have VAR. I've run the line plenty of times. It becomes almost an instinctive thing from years of experience. You are positioning yourself on the last defender while keeping an eye on the play. At the last split second of a forward pass you concentrate on the line of the players while listening for the kick of the ball. I think it would be easier to see if any part of the attacker's body is in front. Wenger's proposal would take quite a while to adjust to without an appreciable benefit.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

******* brilliant.

This sport is absolutely ****ed.

Bit of a sensationalist heading really when you look into it. They're increasing it based on inflation and league table places. Whatever formula that is settled on will need 14 out of 20 votes to pass.

A reality based headline would be "all 20 clubs to vote on new prizemoney distribution that sees all clubs get more money and the EFL to receive an extra 130m pounds in funding"


Guess that wouldn't generate anywhere near the amount of clicks though......
 
Bit of a sensationalist heading really when you look into it. They're increasing it based on inflation and league table places. Whatever formula that is settled on will need 14 out of 20 votes to pass.

A reality based headline would be "all 20 clubs to vote on new prizemoney distribution that sees all clubs get more money and the EFL to receive an extra 130m pounds in funding"


Guess that wouldn't generate anywhere near the amount of clicks though......
It should all go to the EFL. Why do the top clubs need more money? Let it trickle down better.
 
It should all go to the EFL. Why do the top clubs need more money? Let it trickle down better.

All of the PL money should go to the EFL?

What's the point of being in the PL? You spend the big dollars and all the benefits go to the EFL. Seems like the EFL would be the place to be in that scenario.
 
All of the PL money should go to the EFL?

What's the point of being in the PL? You spend the big dollars and all the benefits go to the EFL. Seems like the EFL would be the place to be in that scenario.
No, the new increased fund portion. Keep the winning values what they are.
 
Japanese players really do have longevity - Nakamura retiring at 44.


Of course Kazu Miura is still playing professional in Portugese second divvy at 56.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom