I wasn't being entirely serious haha. That said, the sports party gained a fair bit of momentum after the election through the exposure that they received.
They haven't said which Senate seat it is yet have they?
Technically the senate doesn't have a seat. You have to obtain a quota to get voted into the senate. On first preference votes The Libs got 2.7 quotas and Labour 1.8 quotas. So only 3 of the 6 senators got voted in on first preference votes.
The next 3 had to be determined by allocation of the preferences. If you have a look at the following page and how parties/independents votes are allocated via preferences either below the line or 1 above the line method where the preferences are determined by the party, you will see how complicated it is, that you had to go 29 rounds of allocation of preferences and why you need a full senate re-election.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2013/results/senate/wa/
If you look at the SA vote, Nick Xenophon got 24.89% of the vote or 1.7 quotas and the Liberals 1.9 quotas and the Labor party 1.5 quotas. So again 3 senators automatically got voted in and 3 had to be determined via preferences.
The Xenephon Group votes were basically a vote for him, because nobody knew who his running mate was. But because the way the preference deals were done, Xenephon's running mate missed out to the Family First candidate who 3.76% of the vote or 0.26 of a quota. Xenephon's running mate missed out to the Greens as well because they only got 7.09% and 0.49 of a quota. See
http://www.abc.net.au/news/federal-election-2013/results/senate/sa/