- Feb 19, 2016
- 29,260
- 36,586
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Chrome Dome to get the sack?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently Western Bulldogs are the "real deal" and we aren't because "North haven't beaten anyone" - but the sides we've beaten have won a combined 10 games this year. The teams the Dogs have beaten have won 3. Our draw has been "easy" despite travelling three times already whereas the Dogs have played all 5 games at their home venue. Not to mention that we are yet to play a Victorian side in Victoria - added to the zero Free to Air games we've had so far it's hardly what the membership or marketing department would have wanted. High scoring games are deemed attractive football and the League and media have been creaming themselves about the increase in scoring this year. Despite North games this year having more total points than anyone else, and by the end of today the Bulldogs will probably have the least, the Dogs are the exciting glamour team and our "shootouts" are seen as a weakness.
Not having a go at the Dogs themselves (much), but somehow they've tapped into some positive media spin that we've totally missed out on. If I'm told that their "everyone's 2nd favourite team" one more time, as their former coach said, I'll spew up!
True.
There is no but.Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Kingy has to get lots of milage out of the doggies because the other team he said was bound for glory (tigers) are seriously s**t. And his poster bpy rance is sitting on the sidelines.Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Is this the same imbecile who predicted that North would miss the eight and that Richmond would finish top four? King's credibility is shot as a football analyst. :stern lookEven today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Suddenly our Brisbane win looks alright.
Too true. Brisbane's home form this season - loss to North by 30+, beat Gold Coast, loss to Sydney by 3 points. What conclusion would a scientist come to based on these statistics? I'm betting it would be diametrically opposed to present media opinion.Some spud on SEN or 774 just said they were impressed by Sydney's game, might be right but our win was due to an easy draw I bet
Agree. Saints wont just lie down.Suddenly our game V StKilda could be closer than we would have liked...
My read is ....is that he is trying to keep a dampener on it. He knows 1st hand how public perception can work against a playing group when it reads its own hype. Wait for September before to completely wipe King off .I'm not so worried about Kingy. He's a flog. When I watched the replay and saw him being the "North man" in the "Lab" (spare me) I felt like punching him in the face.
How many times can someone contradict themselves in one statement. Sack him Fox, he has become a dead set twit.Even today I heard Kingy going on about how the Dogs wouldn't have lost any friends last night whilst North have had such and easy draw that they aren't playing that well, just "cashing in". The defensive Dogs played the game on "their terms" and should get credit for restricting us to 61.
Now I know Kingy is an A-grade flog - but seriously...c'mon...FFS...
Suddenly we have an easy draw and we are cashing in!
I'm confused didn't we have one of the hardest draws when it was released in the Herald Sun.
Lol Kingy u Moron!!
Getting all 24 points available is the only thing we should care about. Anyone criticising percentage isn't looking at the real picture.I do agree that our draws notably harder 2nd half. Which is why its crucial to bank as many points as we can before hand. And fortunately we have played well enough so far to do so.
He fits right in.How many times can someone contradict themselves in one statement. Sack him Fox, he has become a dead set twit.