- Joined
- Oct 3, 2008
- Posts
- 1,333
- Reaction score
- 233
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Devout Muslims tend to have more contempt for atheists than they do for non-Islamic religionists.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Devout Muslims tend to have more contempt for atheists than they do for non-Islamic religionists.
assuming half of KSA is as you say thats about 14 million people which is almost 1% of the worlds 1.6 billions muslims soo......
You may also have missed where I said the average Saudi is a racist bigot who entirely endorses jihad.
How's that tiny 1% percent of Muslim population are radicals theory coming along for the regressive's, not great by the looks of that.
assuming half of KSA is as you say thats about 14 million people which is almost 1% of the worlds 1.6 billions muslims soo...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No that's as left wing as it gets. When all the facts and research and information points to a conclusion, you don't hide from it because it look bad or might hurt someone's feelings. That's what conservatives and neoliberals do.
Yes he was using the 1% figure in a mocking tone. He thinks its all muslims.
Yes he was using the 1% figure in a mocking tone. He thinks its all muslims.
Nailed it. How embarrassing for you, VineyIsLORDAccuse others of stereotyping and misrepresenting a religion labelling them bigots and then go on to say the average Saudi is a racist bigot lol........ Yeah I agree that Hypocrisy is as left wing as it gets....anyway lighten up I wasn't serious.
As for your second point that's exactly what you do when it comes to Islam.
1600 posts in a month, some people got too much time in their hands. Boredom you know.I am not even sure though if he is serious here or taking the piss, i hope for his sake he is taking the piss.Nailed it. How embarrassing for you, VineyIsLORD
It would be incredibly sad if he wasn't taking the piss.1600 posts in a month, some people got too much time in their hands. Boredom you know.I am not even sure though if he is serious here or taking the piss, i hope for his sake he is taking the piss.
Lol they are thai people, born in thailand but ethnic malay muslims. This is why i call you a simpleton, 30 years ago, before the war on terror, there was no wahabbism spreading like a cancer. They are south thailand separatists, they want thai muslims to have their own land, you need to read up on history and stop sounding like a broken record
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?err..wahhabism has existed since the 1700's, you think it hasn't spread in 300 years?
you read too much into it, 30 years ago terrorist attacks were mostly in support of the Palestinian cause and it's only been around a decade since that has been hijacked by the likes of AQ and IS.
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?
Nailed it. How embarrassing for you, VineyIsLORD
So the war on terror got nothing to do with it, thanks for confirming that P35 will be livid lolWahabbism started spreading drastically in the 70s.
Nobody is blaming the US for everything, thats just a dumb thing you keep saying.
Not sore, spot on, bad setana just exposed your hypocrisy there. Making sweeping generations about saudis just because their terrorist govt, seriously mate? its like saying north koreans are terrible people. Have you ever been to Saudi? i doubt it, even Saudis hate living in Saudi, most are pretty liberal.Someone is sore.
So the war on terror got nothing to do with it, thanks for confirming that P35 will be livid lol
Btw: can you give me an example of Wahabbist movement outside of the middle east and afghanistan in the 70s?
Its this kind of silliness that makes it impossible to take you seriously. I clearly listed my opinion on the variety of factors in modern islamic terrorism. Western imperialist wars come in at number two.
Afghanistan was certainly one example I had in mind, but Pakistan fits the bill too and there are others, but I dont expect you are capable of understanding at this point. Or if you are your motivation in blaming 1.5 billion people instead of the actual causes will override your motivation to admit it. Either way your comment that Wahabbism was restricted to the middle east until the war on terror was wrong, which yiuve now admitted. Good-o.
You also either deliberately or stupidly misinterpreted my statement on Saudi Arabia. So congrats on maintaining your status as being either a bigot, stupid or a stupid bigot.
Also the Ottomans fought against Wahabbis. So you were wrong on that too.
The statement above is completely true. I still await your examples of major wahabbist violence/movement outside of the middle east. Infact even in the middle east it was pretty restricted till 1981.Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only.
.
You also either deliberately or stupidly misinterpreted my statement on Saudi Arabia. So congrats on maintaining your status as being either a bigot, stupid or a stupid bigot.
You may also have missed where I said the average Saudi is a racist bigot who entirely endorses jihad.
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?

You may want to read what i said to Juddism before you jumped the gun again. I asked you for an example of wahabbist movement OUTSIDE of middle east and afghanistan, and yep nothings coming ofcourse.
The statement above is completely true. I still await your examples of major wahabbist violence/movement outside of the middle east. Infact even in the middle east it was pretty restricted till 1981.
So where is the example of Wahabbism spreading outside of the middle east and afghanistan? Rise of pakistani extremeism was not cause of wahabbism, its resistance to Zia Ul Haq. You may want to educate yourself. So i await your example of wahabbist movement outside of middle east...still. If you cannot just accept that there was no wahabbist movement outside of middle east and afghanistan, case closed. But stop making up shit
And before calling me a bigot, think again, you think Saudis are racist, i dont think all muslims are terrorists btw, i have said it over 100 times here, i think vast majority of the muslims are peaceful. Its a bit rich a bigot is trying to call someone a bigot.
Some more made up shit.
You clearly don't know shit about Islam and yet you keep making it out like you know it all just because you can have read religionofpeace.com.
Give it a rest with your bullshit.
I asked you this: (bloody hell)Your initial post was that it was restricted to the middle east.
Afghanistan is not part of the middle east.
I pointed this out.
You pretended you included Afghanistan initially and asked me to find another example apart from Afghanistan, so i mentioned Pakistan too - again this is not a country in the middle east. I could also mention a variety of other countries but whats the point? You will just pretend you meant them i initially when you made your incorrect statement.
Btw: can you give me an example of Wahabbist movement outside of the middle east and afghanistan in the 70s?
You again refuse to admit that your statement was wrong.
I also pointed out the Ottomans went to war AGAINST Wahabbis, after you incorrectly claimed Wahabbism made the Ottomans violent.
Saudis are racist and mysoginist and arab supremacists. Their entire culture reflects that.

