Remove this Banner Ad

The Terrorism Files - 2015, 2016

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Devout Muslims tend to have more contempt for atheists than they do for non-Islamic religionists.

Depends.

From a Wahabbi point of view:

Jews, Chistians - not so bad, they still believe in the right god. But if the Jew is also an Israeli then they are scum (in reality this is only because the Israeli army stomped the shit out of the Arabs in the 60s and 70s).

Atheists, Shia, Sufi and moderate Sunni - The worst thing on earth

Zoroastrian etc - Wrong gods, see above.
 
...
You may also have missed where I said the average Saudi is a racist bigot who entirely endorses jihad.
assuming half of KSA is as you say thats about 14 million people which is almost 1% of the worlds 1.6 billions muslims soo...

How's that tiny 1% percent of Muslim population are radicals theory coming along for the regressive's, not great by the looks of that.
 
assuming half of KSA is as you say thats about 14 million people which is almost 1% of the worlds 1.6 billions muslims soo...

Yes he was using the 1% figure in a mocking tone. He thinks its all muslims.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No that's as left wing as it gets. When all the facts and research and information points to a conclusion, you don't hide from it because it look bad or might hurt someone's feelings. That's what conservatives and neoliberals do.

Accuse others of stereotyping and misrepresenting a religion labelling them bigots and then go on to say the average Saudi is a racist bigot lol........ Yeah I agree that Hypocrisy is as left wing as it gets....anyway lighten up I wasn't serious.

As for your second point that's exactly what you do when it comes to Islam.
 
guing them bigots and then go on to say the average Saudi is a racist bigot lol........ Yeah I agree that Hypocrisy is as left nyway lighten up I wasn't serious.

As for your second point that's exactly what you do when it comes to Islam.[/QUOTE]

Lol thank **** he put me under ignore, approaching 2,000 posts in just over a month. An islamic apologist and socialist on top of that lol
 
About time the police over there are cracking down on Islamism.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/af...du-priest-slaughtered-western-Bangladesh.html

Bangladesh police on Tuesday launched a deadly crackdown on Islamist militants as a 70-year-old Hindu priest became the latest victim in a series of gruesome killings by suspected jihadists.

As a government minister tried to portray the recent attacks as part of a conspiracy involving Israel's Mossad spy agency, security forces waged deadly gunbattles with members of a homegrown jihadist group.

Two "high-ranking" members of the Jamayetul Mujahideen Bangladesh (JMB) were shot dead in a battle in Dhaka and another was killed in a northwestern district, police told AFP.
 
Accuse others of stereotyping and misrepresenting a religion labelling them bigots and then go on to say the average Saudi is a racist bigot lol........ Yeah I agree that Hypocrisy is as left wing as it gets....anyway lighten up I wasn't serious.

As for your second point that's exactly what you do when it comes to Islam.
Nailed it. How embarrassing for you, VineyIsLORD
 
1600 posts in a month, some people got too much time in their hands. Boredom you know.I am not even sure though if he is serious here or taking the piss, i hope for his sake he is taking the piss.
It would be incredibly sad if he wasn't taking the piss.
 
Lol they are thai people, born in thailand but ethnic malay muslims. This is why i call you a simpleton, 30 years ago, before the war on terror, there was no wahabbism spreading like a cancer. They are south thailand separatists, they want thai muslims to have their own land, you need to read up on history and stop sounding like a broken record

err..wahhabism has existed since the 1700's, you think it hasn't spread in 300 years?

you read too much into it, 30 years ago terrorist attacks were mostly in support of the Palestinian cause and it's only been around a decade since that has been hijacked by the likes of AQ and IS.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

err..wahhabism has existed since the 1700's, you think it hasn't spread in 300 years?

you read too much into it, 30 years ago terrorist attacks were mostly in support of the Palestinian cause and it's only been around a decade since that has been hijacked by the likes of AQ and IS.
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?
 
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?

Wahabbism started spreading drastically in the 70s.

Nobody is blaming the US for everything, thats just a dumb thing you keep saying.
 
Wahabbism started spreading drastically in the 70s.

Nobody is blaming the US for everything, thats just a dumb thing you keep saying.
So the war on terror got nothing to do with it, thanks for confirming that P35 will be livid lol

Btw: can you give me an example of Wahabbist movement outside of the middle east and afghanistan in the 70s?
 
Last edited:
Someone is sore.
Not sore, spot on, bad setana just exposed your hypocrisy there. Making sweeping generations about saudis just because their terrorist govt, seriously mate? its like saying north koreans are terrible people. Have you ever been to Saudi? i doubt it, even Saudis hate living in Saudi, most are pretty liberal.
 
So the war on terror got nothing to do with it, thanks for confirming that P35 will be livid lol

Btw: can you give me an example of Wahabbist movement outside of the middle east and afghanistan in the 70s?

Its this kind of silliness that makes it impossible to take you seriously. I clearly listed my opinion on the variety of factors in modern islamic terrorism. Western imperialist wars come in at number two.

Afghanistan was certainly one example I had in mind, but Pakistan fits the bill too and there are others, but I dont expect you are capable of understanding at this point. Or if you are your motivation in blaming 1.5 billion people instead of the actual causes will override your motivation to admit it. Either way your comment that Wahabbism was restricted to the middle east until the war on terror was wrong, which yiuve now admitted. Good-o.

You also either deliberately or stupidly misinterpreted my statement on Saudi Arabia. So congrats on maintaining your status as being either a bigot, stupid or a stupid bigot.

Also the Ottomans fought against Wahabbis. So you were wrong on that too.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Its this kind of silliness that makes it impossible to take you seriously. I clearly listed my opinion on the variety of factors in modern islamic terrorism. Western imperialist wars come in at number two.

Afghanistan was certainly one example I had in mind, but Pakistan fits the bill too and there are others, but I dont expect you are capable of understanding at this point. Or if you are your motivation in blaming 1.5 billion people instead of the actual causes will override your motivation to admit it. Either way your comment that Wahabbism was restricted to the middle east until the war on terror was wrong, which yiuve now admitted. Good-o.

You also either deliberately or stupidly misinterpreted my statement on Saudi Arabia. So congrats on maintaining your status as being either a bigot, stupid or a stupid bigot.

Also the Ottomans fought against Wahabbis. So you were wrong on that too.

You may want to read what i said to Juddism before you jumped the gun again. I asked you for an example of wahabbist movement OUTSIDE of middle east and afghanistan, and yep nothings coming ofcourse.
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only.
The statement above is completely true. I still await your examples of major wahabbist violence/movement outside of the middle east. Infact even in the middle east it was pretty restricted till 1981.
So where is the example of Wahabbism spreading outside of the middle east and afghanistan? Rise of pakistani extremeism was not cause of wahabbism, its resistance to Zia Ul Haq. You may want to educate yourself. So i await your example of wahabbist movement outside of middle east...still. If you cannot just accept that there was no wahabbist movement outside of middle east and afghanistan, case closed. But stop making up shit

And before calling me a bigot, think again, you think Saudis are racist, i dont think all muslims are terrorists btw, i have said it over 100 times here, i think vast majority of the muslims are peaceful. Its a bit rich a bigot is trying to call someone a bigot.
 
Last edited:
.

You also either deliberately or stupidly misinterpreted my statement on Saudi Arabia. So congrats on maintaining your status as being either a bigot, stupid or a stupid bigot.

You may also have missed where I said the average Saudi is a racist bigot who entirely endorses jihad.

Lol your quote is for everyone to see, and you have the cheek to call someone a bigot.
 
Wahabbism started to spread after the war on terror, previously it was pretty much restricted to the middle east only. Wahabbism was pretty much the inspiration beind the Ottomans and their massacre but to lump ALL muslims with wahabbism is wrong. And 2ndly are people going to take responsibility for their actions or not? if you blame everything on an ideology but not the people who are falling for it, then i ask you if anyone is guilty at all. If US interventionist policies are responsible for the rise in Wahabbism then you got a point, if the whole Muslim world is falling for Wahabbism prior to the US interventionist policies, then my point is proven, its already there before the war on terror. So why on earth people do come here and start blaming the US for everything?

Some more made up shit. :rolleyes:

You clearly don't know shit about Islam and yet you keep making it out like you know it all just because you can have read religionofpeace.com.
Give it a rest with your bullshit.
 
You may want to read what i said to Juddism before you jumped the gun again. I asked you for an example of wahabbist movement OUTSIDE of middle east and afghanistan, and yep nothings coming ofcourse.

The statement above is completely true. I still await your examples of major wahabbist violence/movement outside of the middle east. Infact even in the middle east it was pretty restricted till 1981.
So where is the example of Wahabbism spreading outside of the middle east and afghanistan? Rise of pakistani extremeism was not cause of wahabbism, its resistance to Zia Ul Haq. You may want to educate yourself. So i await your example of wahabbist movement outside of middle east...still. If you cannot just accept that there was no wahabbist movement outside of middle east and afghanistan, case closed. But stop making up shit

And before calling me a bigot, think again, you think Saudis are racist, i dont think all muslims are terrorists btw, i have said it over 100 times here, i think vast majority of the muslims are peaceful. Its a bit rich a bigot is trying to call someone a bigot.

Your initial post was that it was restricted to the middle east.

Afghanistan is not part of the middle east.

I pointed this out.

You pretended you included Afghanistan initially and asked me to find another example apart from Afghanistan, so i mentioned Pakistan too - again this is not a country in the middle east. I could also mention a variety of other countries but whats the point? You will just pretend you meant them i initially when you made your incorrect statement.

You again refuse to admit that your statement was wrong.

I also pointed out the Ottomans went to war AGAINST Wahabbis, after you incorrectly claimed Wahabbism made the Ottomans violent.

You are now acting petulant because you were proven wrong again.

Stop being a dumbass please. It is painful for the rest of us.

Saudis are racist and mysoginist and arab supremacists. Their entire culture reflects that.
 
Some more made up shit. :rolleyes:

You clearly don't know shit about Islam and yet you keep making it out like you know it all just because you can have read religionofpeace.com.
Give it a rest with your bullshit.

Bloke is off tap stupid.
 
Your initial post was that it was restricted to the middle east.

Afghanistan is not part of the middle east.

I pointed this out.

You pretended you included Afghanistan initially and asked me to find another example apart from Afghanistan, so i mentioned Pakistan too - again this is not a country in the middle east. I could also mention a variety of other countries but whats the point? You will just pretend you meant them i initially when you made your incorrect statement.
I asked you this: (bloody hell)

Btw: can you give me an example of Wahabbist movement outside of the middle east and afghanistan in the 70s?

Is it so hard for you to comprehend?


You again refuse to admit that your statement was wrong.

I also pointed out the Ottomans went to war AGAINST Wahabbis, after you incorrectly claimed Wahabbism made the Ottomans violent.

you are right, i was wrong, i am man enough to admit it, unlike liars and bigots like you, i am big enough. I pointed out over 3 times in our convo you lied, you just avoided it.
Saudis are racist and mysoginist and arab supremacists. Their entire culture reflects that.

Lol bigot and proud of it. Going by that, south africans are racist, white aussies are murderers, north koreans are psychos, israelis are cold blooded killers lol carry on, bigot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom