If that is the case how can you have the batsmen completing 2 runs and Stokes being on strike again if it was only 5 runs. Stokes was down the batsmens end again when the ball hit him. The rule says when fieldsman "throws ball"or ïn the act". The act was when the ball hit Stokes bat after completing his 2nd run so ruling is very unclear. 6 runs makes more sense. If it was 5 runs would Stokes be on strike or would batsmen have to change ends when they have completed a full 2 runs. It wouldn't make sense. Was tough on the kiwis though