- Joined
- Jul 25, 2010
- Posts
- 32,674
- Reaction score
- 18,767
- Location
- Meekatharra
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Golden State Warriors NBA Champions
Who else is this flog managing?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Adelaide - Rd 14 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games

I think we are ALL confused by it. Blucher added that Kurt really liked the idea of being coached by Horse because he played in the same position and then added, he also liked the idea of having a taller coach seeing he hadn't had a coach over 5'9"! Sando is 6'1"! So I get it referred to short arse Craig, but what is sando? Chopped liver? Maybe Kurt didn't like sando? Or maybe, just maybe, blucher is a Moo.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I just did some math and I'm not sure I have figured it correctly, so tell me if I'm wrong........
If we paid Tippett $800,000 for this season then it worked out to around $20,000 per goal!.....and even when he didn't score it cost us about $40,000 per game! I'm struggling with this!!!!!!!!!!!!
In one of belchers interviews he said tiprat wanted to play for a coach taller than 5'9". However Sando is 6'1" so doesn't make sense.Can someone explain the meaning or context behind this? I mean the part about Kurt Tippett and Brenton Sanderson.
I don't get it
In one of belchers interviews he said tiprat wanted to play for a coach taller than 5'9". However Sando is 6'1" so doesn't make sense.
It remains one of the most ridiculous lines ever uttered... would've loved to hear him say that to someone like LethalIn one of belchers interviews he said tiprat wanted to play for a coach taller than 5'9". However Sando is 6'1" so doesn't make sense.

He cares only about his percentage, nothing moreBlucher is an A-grade Moo!, must be a massive silly to think we'd accept pick 22 cos of some crap gentleman's agreement that technically is no longer valid.
If we get Roughead for Tippett we are laughing all the way to the bank. We would do this in a heartbeat especially considering that Roughy can play forward, back and as a back up ruckman and he is only 25 (same age as the culture Kurt)No way.
We need to give our remaining talls a chance. We tooo need to get young defenders into the mix. Rutten has two years left at most, but in this time our other guys will get stronger also with age and maturity
If we get Roughead for Tippett we are laughing all the way to the bank. We would do this in a heartbeat especially considering that Roughy can play forward, back and as a back up ruckman and he is only 25 (same age as the culture Kurt)
Would you give up our 2nd rounder to the Hawks too if thats what it took to get Roughy?
Last Saturday, Sydney was most people's no. 2 team. This week they are public enemy number one! Lovin' it.
Haha! Jenny testing out the swear filter....I LOVE IT! Never thought I would see the dayI think we are ALL confused by it. Blucher added that Kurt really liked the idea of being coached by Horse because he played in the same position and then added, he also liked the idea of having a taller coach seeing he hadn't had a coach over 5'9"! Sando is 6'1"! So I get it referred to short arse Craig, but what is sando? Chopped liver? Maybe Kurt didn't like sando? Or maybe, just maybe, blucher is a Moo.
Im just thinking a deal could work like this:
Adel: Lose Tippett and 2nd/ 3rd rounder. Gain Roughead
Sydney: Lose a player to hawks. Gain Tip
Hawks: Lose Roughie, Gain a player from Sydney and a draft pick
The player would have to have some currency, what sort of needs would the Hawks have, that the Swans could get rid of.
3rd or the Chris Knights compo pick.
Like others I have a sneaking suspicion that Sydney know something about one of their players (Kennedy or Reid) that has driven them to chase this Tippett deal...how aboutThe paper is reporting Collingwood is trying to get pick four from Melbour for Dawes and Wellingham. The way this is looking Collingwood will come out better than us as always. We should be getting just as much thus Adelaide need to let this be known.
Where is this Roughead talk coming from? The only place I've seen it mentioned is on this board.
Where is this Roughead talk coming from? The only place I've seen it mentioned is on this board.
Would you give up our 2nd rounder to the Hawks too if thats what it took to get Roughy?