Tom Lynch Adelaide

[dazzledavey36]

Sen have reported that Tom Lynch is seriously considering a 4 year deal from the Dees as he isn't satisfied with just the 2 year deal with the crows. Wants the security as he has a young family.

Should the crows up their offer?

 

[VitalDread]

Dawes and Lynch in the forward line
kek

 

[Dez!]

Dawes and Lynch in the forward line
kek

I think the idea is he would replaces Dawes.

I'm hoping that would be the idea anyway.

 

[VitalDread]

I think the idea is he would replaces Dawes.

I'm hoping that would be the idea anyway.

isn't Dawes contracted for next year? So they will still need to pay out his contract if they delist him

 

[Dez!]

isn't Dawes contracted for next year? So they will still need to pay out his contract if they delist him

He is but I meant replace in team.

 

[Zach Package]

Sen have reported that Tom Lynch is seriously considering a 4 year deal from the Dees as he isn't satisfied with just the 2 year deal with the crows. Wants the security as he has a young family.

Should the crows up their offer?

Lynch is critical to Adelaide's structure, they need to do everything they can to keep him

 

[grimlock]

Number 1 in the AFL in goal assists

 

[Gumby2Hurley]

Would be great as a 3rd fwd for most teams.

 

[moses]

Hopefully we can reach agreement and re-sign him. Has had a pretty good year and plays that important link man / high half forward role.

What would the Dees be willing to offload to get him?

 

[kreglze]

I'd take having double Tom Lynch on the GC. We need a 3rd tall option too.

 

[MRB37]

His play in the second half of the year certainly isn't hurting his chances on getting a 3rd year from us if he wants it. I'd be seriously PO'd if we wouldn't budge on 2 years while giving someone like Mackay, who isn't even in our 22 at the moment 4 years.

 

[doona]

Would definitely be an Adelaide fail if they didn't offer him a 4 year contract.

 

[ize_]

Can't understand why they'd only be offering him 2 years.

 

[marty36]

Would consider trading him is ok but definetly replaceable two year deal is fair maybe 3 at tops can't over commit to players not in your top 10

 

[Troy87]

Would consider trading him is ok but definetly replaceable two year deal is fair maybe 3 at tops can't over commit to players not in your top 10

Marty ur off ur dial. Hes one of our most important players and critical to our structure. We struggled with forward structure when he was injured. AFC know his value to the team. Im confident a deal will b done.

 

[1990crow]

Seriously Adelaide. You offer David Mackay 4 years and yet dont offer Tom Lynch the same..

 

[Golumless]

Can't understand why they'd only be offering him 2 years.

First full season Lynch has strung together without getting injured at some point, so it's understandable that the club isn't wanting 3 years.

We'll budge though, Lynch's form has been too good.

 

[JD Tomahawk]

Hm, Lynch to dees for Dawes and a pick?

 

[Golumless]

Hm, Lynch to dees for Dawes and a pick?

Hahahahahahahahahaha

No.

(The Dawes part, we're set for forwards)

If Demons were willing to give up their first, i'm sure we'd consider it.

 

[Moist Biscuit]

Hope we're in his ear. We need blokes who have a natural goal sense in our side.

 

[markm106]

Hahahahahahahahahaha

No.

(The Dawes part, we're set for forwards)

If Demons were willing to give up their first, i'm sure we'd consider it.

Ok we'll give you our first if you chuck in Danger.

 

[irish]

Swap for aish ?

 

[theteamtobeat]

Swap for aish ?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. We need a number 1 key forward not a third forward.

 

[Infra Ted]

Hahahahahahahahahaha

No.

(The Dawes part, we're set for forwards)

If Demons were willing to give up their first, i'm sure we'd consider it.

Pick 5ish for Tom Lynch is way overs I think we'd do more than consider it.

 

[Golumless]

Pick 5ish for Tom Lynch is way overs I think we'd do more than consider it.

Always start high with asking price.