Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
How is Papley any better than Lloyd other than being younger? Don’t get me wrong happy to get him but not at the price some are willing to pay.
How is Papley any better than Lloyd other than being younger? Don’t get me wrong happy to get him but not at the price some are willing to pay.

Kind of like how no one rated Gia. And they were/are wrong, wrong, wrong.You know how people I stand with at games that don’t rate Hunter? Nearly all of them. If I had a dollar for every time he butchers a kick or handball and someone says: yeah, time to trade him, I’d be rich![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I assume he’d cost our pick 13 in some form.Apparently we met with Howard last week. Fingers crossed we land him would be a good get
Happy to pay it too, he's easily worth that even with nothing coming back. Super athletic, can take on the brute key forward. Led the comp in one percenters a year or two agoI assume he’d cost our pick 13 in some form.
I assume he’d cost our pick 13 in some form.
You’re right disposals alone don’t tell the true picture and value has many measures you only have to look at Toby’s last quarter against GWS in our prelim to see his true worth. Don’t mind Papley like I said earlier but I ain’t shipping out beloved premiership players to get him inDisposals alone don't tell you much. The averages of those three games - 1.3 goals, 3.6 marks, 3 tackles. That's about what McLean averages for his whole year except goals are much lower. So Papley's worst is about even with McLean overall.
Apparently we met with Howard last week. Fingers crossed we land him would be a good get
I don’t mind it, personally I think bringing in 3 talls is overs but would set us up for the future. I’d prefer a quick small forward.Happy to pay it too, he's easily worth that even with nothing coming back. Super athletic, can take on the brute key forward. Led the comp in one percenters a year or two ago
Post above. I’ve seen no reports on it.Where was this reported?
Yeah 3 talls maybe slightly overdoing it (would have preferred Howard over Keath) but given how much we lacked in this department, it probably just brings us to a normal level.I don’t mind it, personally I think bringing in 3 talls is overs but would set us up for the future. I’d prefer a quick small forward.
I don’t mind it, personally I think bringing in 3 talls is overs but would set us up for the future. I’d prefer a quick small forward.
I'd still like Bruce. Howard should be a key defender, he really didn't show much as a key forward and was eventually dropped over his form up forward. Rather not have 3 underdeveloped forward pillars when we can bring in the experienced one (Bruce) and have Howard develop as the big KPD that takes on the number 1 KPFIf we get Howard, stuff Bruce (except for a pick in the 40's).
Very different players, we need both types. Anything to avoid handing 13 to the Saints is good with me.If we get Howard, stuff Bruce (except for a pick in the 40's).
That's a good game.I love Toby, and doubt he'd be going anywhere, but I also believe Papley is objectively the better and more valuable player. Never seen Toby win a game off his own back, while Papley has. In particular, go and watch West Coast vs Sydney from earlier this year. 27 disposals, 5 inside 50s, 7 marks (4 inside 50), kicked 5.2. No offence to Toby, but he's never had a game like that, and also plays a position we have way too much depth in.
A straight swap Toby for Papley we'd be laughing
Haha asking the same question a few times there!! Do you work for the mediaIf someone could confirm or please give us the info on the news that Howard met with the dogs last week id love to hear it?

Considering Toby plays midfield judging him on goal output is just as unfair as judging Papley on disposals.Disposals alone don't tell you much. The averages of those three games - 1.3 goals, 3.6 marks, 3 tackles. That's about what McLean averages for his whole year except goals are much lower. So Papley's worst is about even with McLean overall.
That's a good game.
I've seen Toby have plenty of excellent matches too. Particularly last year. I could throw a bunch of stats at you too but I don't think that would be productive, I just value consistency. This was undeniably a down year for Toby and his stats are more than comparable (some might even say better). I'm pretty comfortable in my assessment on that basis alone.