Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Can't see him being let go for a 3rdWe'll ask for a 2nd. Settle on 3rd.
Everybody wins.
I can, I'd like a second but I think that's expecting a bit too much. We were very fortunate to get that for Caleb Daniel, I suspect an early third round pick is about right. I think this plus a 2nd rounder gets Butts done (assuming he nominates us).Can't see him being let go for a 3rd
Honestly would sooner bring up Will Lewis from the VFL as the backup forward. Yes he is mature but so was James PodsiadlyPoulter might get an extra year with Buku requesting a trade. They were both competing for that 3rd tall role in different stages of the year.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They're offering him a 4 year contractI can, I'd like a second but I think that's expecting a bit too much. We were very fortunate to get that for Caleb Daniel, I suspect an early third round pick is about right. I think this plus a 2nd rounder gets Butts done (assuming he nominates us).
I cant see the point in keeping him.Can't see him being let go for a 3rd
Why wouldn't you hold him as depth?I cant see the point in keeping him.
To hang onto him purely as a depth option is as counterproductive for his game as it is for our list management. Especially in here where its a wholly old trope that we hand onto guys like Khamis for far too long.
I cant imagine a space where the club would want to stifle the career of a guy that they took as a CatB rookie who clearly doesn't have a position in our best 22. Id imagine that this will be one of the easiest and quickest trades that take place early in trade week.
One that will in reality probably land at a pick swap that is painless for all parties. I suspect that will mean a 3rd round upgrade for us.
We shall see.
No we traded up for the Wizard the Hawks were looking at Sanders and changed their mind.We traded 3 first rounders to get the bloke
Pretty sure someone with solid info confirmed it was always sanders we wanted and confirmed it a few weeks before the actual draftNo we traded up for the Wizard the Hawks were looking at Sanders and changed their mind.
As simple as goodwill with the player and with clubs we actually trade well with.Why wouldn't you hold him as depth?
We would still likely get a 3rd for him next year anyway,
Unlike a McComb McNeil Will Hayes type he is acceptable at his role at AFL level
True or not, they kind of have to say this if they want any trade value whatsoever for him.Unpopular thing
But Dogs are fine with Marra coming back for 2026 if no Trade is worth it
Yes I know.They're offering him a 4 year contract
Unpopular thing
But Dogs are fine with Marra coming back for 2026 if no Trade is worth it
Why wouldn't you hold him as depth?
We would still likely get a 3rd for him next year anyway,
Unlike a McComb McNeil Will Hayes type he is acceptable at his role at AFL level
For the same reason teams keep picking up BTC tall reliable depth isn't easy to come by,Because unlike McComb and Hayes who each spent a mere two years on the list. Khamis has been at the club for 7.
Thats seems an appropriate amount of time to cement a place in the 22. Even for somebody coming from as far back as Khmais did. If you they haven't by then, its long past time to turn the spot over to somebody who might.
Another year on the list and he'd likely be a DFA.
Regardless of bigfooty posturing the deal will probably land at a swap for a of 3rd rounders.
VD and Marra is like you and Biggsy back in the day, BigFloppaSorry VD but I strongly doubt this is true. You've always had a strong Marra bias and you've usually been wrong when making predictions about what will happen with him. Not having a crack at you because you're a great member of this board but I don't trust your judgement on this topic. I'd put my house on Marra being somewhere other than the Dogs next year. Although I'm sure we are posturing that we would welcome him back just to try to get some trade value somewhere.

For the same reason teams keep picking up BTC tall reliable depth isn't easy to come by,
Buku wouldn't be delisted next year however I am sure he would leave for opportunity
They are offering 600k for 4 years he is contracted if he wasn't I would agree it would be for a 3rd
As am I, I don’t want to hand him over for nothing. Even if it is only a slight chance of him coming back in 2026 raring to go, I rather that chance be with us.Unpopular thing
But Dogs are fine with Marra coming back for 2026 if no Trade is worth it