- Joined
- Dec 14, 2007
- Posts
- 2,657
- Reaction score
- 1,599
- Location
- Thomastown
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Manchester United!!!!
Simon Buckley is NOT a Good Kick! Gets it a fair amount and burns every kick!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

sorry long kickSimon Buckley is NOT a Good Kick! Gets it a fair amount and burns every kick!
Mitchell Banner 179 cm / 80 kg Midfielder / Forward
Tough inside mid who kicks goals.
Simon Buckley 190cm / 93 kg Defender / Midfielder
Good kick who provides run and carry off half back or even play midfield.
Matthew Bate 192cm / 91kg Forward / Midfielder
Massive kick good marking and good endurance.
Sam Lonergan 182 cm / 81 kg Forward / Midfielder
Tough inside mid who tackles well and can go up forward .
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I am worried for him.
Reminds me of Andreas Everitt.
Bit part player however his body breaks down. Needs another 3 years lifting weights and putting on some size as he is very skinny and wont play AFL built like he is.
Josh Toy has not been delisted to he either re-signs and stays or he enters the draft. He can not be picked up as a delisted free agent.
You would think at this point they really should have delisted him.I think he will enter the draft, as he told the Club that he wants to play in a Victorian Club
You would think at this point they really should have delisted him.
haha so we spoke to soon!Josh Toy has been de-listed.
haha so we spoke to soon!
i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.
i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.
They have no other choice to work hard and improve before they can consider leaving. The next few years will be telling.Sure. I just expected a bit more at this point. It's a credit to the clubs that there hasn't been thus far.
in a nutshell I think that's probably spot on, although if i was a betting man id say Ozzie will struggle to get his spot back on the senior list and will end up as a rookie at best. There is a fair bit of time to pass until the end of the rookie draft and I would think there's every chance the clubs plans will change between now and then.So basically what you're saying is that Hawthorn is Toy's prefered destination but he will end up at either the bulldogs/bombers because we don't want him. (our preference is ozzie).
I would think so but I certainly wont be parting with my left aggot if its off the markIs the source reliable?
i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.
With our current squad, how many picks do we have in the draft right now?
I really don't think we will re-draft Osborne
I mean, if we were going to do it then what is the point of delisting him and forfeiting veterans list benefits? Unless we are waiting on Toy, I can't see the logic.
If I understand it right, as a delisted player Toy now becomes a free agent, which means he can sign with any club he wants, between tomorrow and Nov 13. If he wanted to go to Hawthorn then he would if Hawthorn wanted him.
As a likely top 3 pick in 2010, had he not been pre-listed, then I would think he is worth taking the gamble on as he would only effectively take up pick 84 at the moment. Just depends what Hawthorn's testing on him showed.
He would be a better selection than Campbell, Bate, Gillies and all the other names that have been floated.
One possible reasoning would be, if we didn't delist Osborne and happened to pick up a delisted free agent, we would only have 2 picks in the draft. Since every club needs to have a mandatory 3 picks, the club could delist a player and simply re-list them in the draft to make the mandatory 3 picks. Of course that comes with the risk the player might get picked up by another club.