Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Trading, Drafting & General Cattle Rustling Part III

  • Thread starter Thread starter grizzlym
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mitchell Banner 179 cm / 80 kg Midfielder / Forward
Tough inside mid who kicks goals.
Simon Buckley 190cm / 93 kg Defender / Midfielder
Good kick who provides run and carry off half back or even play midfield.
Matthew Bate 192cm / 91kg Forward / Midfielder
Massive kick good marking and good endurance.
Sam Lonergan 182 cm / 81 kg Forward / Midfielder
Tough inside mid who tackles well and can go up forward .

None of these rejects would add anything to the Hawthorn Football Club. Refer them to the Box Hill Hawks drafting/recruiting thread.
 
Josh Toy has not been delisted to he either re-signs and stays or he enters the draft. He can not be picked up as a delisted free agent.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.
 
i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.

So basically what you're saying is that Hawthorn is Toy's prefered destination but he will end up at either the bulldogs/bombers because we don't want him. (our preference is ozzie).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.

Is the source reliable?
 
So basically what you're saying is that Hawthorn is Toy's prefered destination but he will end up at either the bulldogs/bombers because we don't want him. (our preference is ozzie).
in a nutshell I think that's probably spot on, although if i was a betting man id say Ozzie will struggle to get his spot back on the senior list and will end up as a rookie at best. There is a fair bit of time to pass until the end of the rookie draft and I would think there's every chance the clubs plans will change between now and then.
 
Just had a look at the full list of delisted free agents available http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/150582/default.aspx

I just think we are in our premiership window so we should recruit players who will put selection pressure on next year which will make the team better. Pick 29 is for a youngster but the rest can be delisted players and that would be fine with me.

Delisted free agents the club should consider IMO:

Sam Lonergan
Tom Gillies
Sam Iles
Ricky Pettard
Matt Campbell
Jarred Moore

Obviously we wouldn't recruit them all, but a couple of these guys might help, and certainly wouldn't hurt considering that a kid drafted with Pick 68 is pretty unlikely to have any impact next year. It's all about next year.
 
i was told yesterday that Hawthorn is Toy's preferred destination but he is more likely to end up with the Dogs or the Bombers. As hes been delisted it could effectively be Toy for Ozzie onto our senior list. Osborne has been brilliant for our club but i think for obvious reasons his best will be behind him and would welcome Toy taking his place.

If I understand it right, as a delisted player Toy now becomes a free agent, which means he can sign with any club he wants, between tomorrow and Nov 13. If he wanted to go to Hawthorn then he would if Hawthorn wanted him.

As a likely top 3 pick in 2010, had he not been pre-listed, then I would think he is worth taking the gamble on as he would only effectively take up pick 84 at the moment. Just depends what Hawthorn's testing on him showed.

He would be a better selection than Campbell, Bate, Gillies and all the other names that have been floated.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I really don't think we will re-draft Osborne

I mean, if we were going to do it then what is the point of delisting him and forfeiting veterans list benefits? Unless we are waiting on Toy, I can't see the logic.
 
I really don't think we will re-draft Osborne

I mean, if we were going to do it then what is the point of delisting him and forfeiting veterans list benefits? Unless we are waiting on Toy, I can't see the logic.

One possible reasoning would be, if we didn't delist Osborne and happened to pick up a delisted free agent, we would only have 2 picks in the draft. Since every club needs to have a mandatory 3 picks, the club could delist a player and simply re-list them in the draft to make the mandatory 3 picks. Of course that comes with the risk the player might get picked up by another club.
 
If I understand it right, as a delisted player Toy now becomes a free agent, which means he can sign with any club he wants, between tomorrow and Nov 13. If he wanted to go to Hawthorn then he would if Hawthorn wanted him.

As a likely top 3 pick in 2010, had he not been pre-listed, then I would think he is worth taking the gamble on as he would only effectively take up pick 84 at the moment. Just depends what Hawthorn's testing on him showed.

He would be a better selection than Campbell, Bate, Gillies and all the other names that have been floated.

That would make sense of the previous maneuvering.

There is a man who would know about Toy's status Roddy27
 
One possible reasoning would be, if we didn't delist Osborne and happened to pick up a delisted free agent, we would only have 2 picks in the draft. Since every club needs to have a mandatory 3 picks, the club could delist a player and simply re-list them in the draft to make the mandatory 3 picks. Of course that comes with the risk the player might get picked up by another club.

Fair enough but I still have a feeling that Oz won't be at the club next year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom