- Joined
- Sep 9, 2015
- Posts
- 25,614
- Reaction score
- 26,002
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Liverpool had a 30% one in their deal
Haven't seen that reported anywhere.
Any kind of sell on % after paying that much seems like a huge win for the selling team though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Liverpool had a 30% one in their deal
Liverpool had a 30% one in their deal
Fab was saying on youtube that its pretty much done. Sorry mate. Reddy has sound to be quite the Red over the last few days.
To me Chelsea have had his heart since May and just assumed it'd happen eventually.
Liverpool have secretly been planning a late bid and have gone in ghungho at the last minute thinking we wouldnt match. And then thought it wouldnt be a problem getting Caicedo to choose them after we pulled out.
But Caicedo has wanted Chelsea since May and hes not Interested in Liverpool. So all youve done is bump up the price.
The only winners here are Caicedo and Brighton.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah Reddy mentioned their was sell-on clause, not sure the actual number just what was rumoured.Haven't seen that reported anywhere.
Any kind of sell on % after paying that much seems like a huge win for the selling team though.
Haven't seen that reported anywhere.
Any kind of sell on % after paying that much seems like a huge win for the selling team though.
Do I?Ok so you have your answer then.
Do I?
My question was "does Chelsea get any exemption or relief due to having new ownership".
Not sure how player sales and length of contract answers that but there you go.
Of course they don't, it was a flippant question.
If you meant it seriously then you're far dumber than you've ever demonstrated previously.
A bit of unnecessary aggression over a pretty simple question, everything OK?
I know the UEFA rules were changed a few years back to allow a new ownership some relief from FFP in the first few years, just wasn't sure if the same applied to premier league ffp.
Because it was a serious question.I'm fine lol, it was a moronic question and it was pretty clear it was just a flippant comment. I have no idea why you're now trying to pretend it was serious.
Because it was a serious question.
But I can see its not really worth carrying on, so let's move on from here as well.
The old classic when you dont agree with SM, you're instantly having a mare.
Im off to a good start on my BigFooty Bingo card this season!
It's not obvious at all.
It really is. The last time we had a big net spend was the 2018 window.
Amortization (your favourite chestnut) is bugger all for us.
Allison - 0
Kelleher - 0
Trent - 0
Virgil - 0
Konate -8m
Tsimikas - 2m
Matip - 0
Jones - 0
Bajcetic - 0
Morton - 0
Macalister - 7m
Szoboszlai - 12m
Thiago - 4m
Elliot - 800k
Jota - 8m
Diaz - 8m
Nunez - 13m
Gakpo - 8m
Salah - 0
Many of our player sales in recent years have been players who's full value has been realised (Fabinho / Henderson), youth products or players who have a low book value (Manes book value 7m - sold for 30m). Helps when freebies like Matip / Milner plus cheap buys like Robertson / Thiago have been mainstays of the side.
We are in profit over FY 20/21 & 21/22 - despite covid effects. Would say our 22/23 books will be quite healthy when released also.
This, combined with our turnover sees maybe only Spurs after selling Kane better placed FFP wise this summer.
This of course presumes that owners are willing to spend their allowance. FSG clearly aren't interested in doing that where Chelsea are the opposite end of the scale in that regard.
Brighton would have a bitNet spend isn't a figure that is seen in accounts or FFP returns. Your amortisation plus wages is at the top end of the league. Your profits aren't huge.
I'm sure that you've got room for spending as far as FFP goes, but others would have more.
Net spend isn't a figure that is seen in accounts or FFP returns. Your amortisation plus wages is at the top end of the league. Your profits aren't huge.
I'm sure that you've got room for spending as far as FFP goes, but others would have more.
Brighton would have a bit
You've lost Fabinio, Milner, Henderson, Firminho, Keita and Oxlade-Chamberlain.I'll have to dig up the thread on twitter but our wage bill has been cut by something like 8-900k / week this season. Some big name departures and plenty of youth players promoted to the senior squad on small wages.
Prediction for our financials is a profit of 76m - despite a poor season:
![]()
Liverpool could be set for record £602m figure as Man Utd finally surpassed
A report from analysts at Off The Pitch has forecasted the financial situation for clubs across the 2021/22 accounting periodwww.liverpoolecho.co.uk
Amortisation is definitely not at the top end of the league after this summer. Konate, Gakpo, Diaz, Nunez & Jota are the only high value players on our books that are not fully realised apart from our 2 new signings Mac (7m) & Soz (12m). We actually are ahead with departures of Firmino (5m), Ox (7m) and Keita (10m). Not to mention we just sold 52m of fully realised assets in Henderson / Fabinho.
All other squad members are either free / low priced transfers, fully realised on our books or youth products.
We're in a fantastic position in that regard and could easily afford to add 2 100m pound players if needed this window with ease FFP wise - even on the standard 5 year contract at 20m / season.