Remove this Banner Ad

Travis Cloke

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He has never done anything ever to justify that coin, but is he worth it for a club like Richmond in a time like now?

As a player? No.

As a finance generating resource? Absolutely.

He would return the million plus interest by taking the Tiges the next step and activating (fickle) elements of the Tiger Army.

You would get the million back, you just couldn't spend it on player payments.
good post..:)
:)
 
One thing that would be good if we did get cloke is the look on eddie mcguires face every time Cloke kicked a goal against the pies..arr the serenity...maybe he could throw Dane swan in the deal as a extra sweetener. :) :D :rolleyes: :cool:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Fev or Barry Hall. Maybe even try and entice Plugger out of retirement.
As ridiculous as the notion of Fevola is or Even Plugger lol it puts things clearly into perspective I think.

You could spend $1m on Cloke for say 50-60 goals and the chance to divide your club.
You could spend $80,000 on Fev for about the same.
 
As ridiculous as the notion of Fevola is or Even Plugger lol it puts things clearly into perspective I think.

You could spend $1m on Cloke for say 50-60 goals and the chance to divide your club.
You could spend $80,000 on Fev for about the same.
Fev has as much chance of being at Tigerland next year as Richo has coming out of retirement.
 
The thing I don't understand is people using Cloke's goal tally as a reason to not try get him. He plays his best footy as a high CHF using his superior workrate/strong marking to beat his opponent. He's not going to kick goals from up on the wings. However, he does have the ability to slot them from 55-60m. If he kicks 50 goals which he is more than capable of he will be doing his role as it should allow Jack to get 65+ on the 2nd defender and Tyrone 35-40 on the 3rd defender. That's 7-8 goals a game on average before you factor is guys like Cotchin, Deledio and Martin and the small forwards crumbing these guys. His real asset to the team will be pushing up onto the wings and giving us that link we are missing between defence and Jack at FF.

Edit: For a marking comparison. The great year Jack had where we could sit back expecting Jack to mark everything that was near him. He had 123 marks at an average of about 5.6 per game. This year he has taken 74 at an average of 4.6 per game. Cloke in the meantime has supposively had a relatively poor year but has taken 94 marks at an average of 5.9. Last year he took 192 at an average of 7.7 whilst kicking 69 goals.
 
Fwiw , Cloke has kicked 35 of Collingwoods 225 goals this season , whilst jack has kicked 47 of our 216 .
Think solely on goal kicking Jack could put a very good case for wanting a similar contract ?
Before everyone jumps up and down , I did say solely on goal kicking and I also don't think our players, who have gone through the development years , should have to be underpaid to fit in a mercenary , in the hope they assist them to play finals .
This could all have another twist if he is dropped , his form ain't great in a side which poccesses' arguably the best midfield .
Stick to developing our own stars and trading for depth .
 
Fev has as much chance of being at Tigerland next year as Richo has coming out of retirement.
I understand this. I think you missed the point old son.
 
Fwiw , Cloke has kicked 35 of Collingwoods 225 goals this season , whilst jack has kicked 47 of our 216 .
Think solely on goal kicking Jack could put a very good case for wanting a similar contract ?
Before everyone jumps up and down , I did say solely on goal kicking and I also don't think our players, who have gone through the development years , should have to be underpaid to fit in a mercenary , in the hope they assist them to play finals .
This could all have another twist if he is dropped , his form ain't great in a side which poccesses' arguably the best midfield .
Stick to developing our own stars and trading for depth .

They play different roles. Jack is a better goal kicker while Trav is better further up the ground and a great mark. In fact they compliment each other pretty much perfectly. The Pies apparently offered 3.7 mill with the last 500k performance based.

Now I'm just reading between the lines of what Craig Cameron said yesterday but I took it as we can afford to match the reported figures of the Melbourne and Freo offers but it sounded like we'd rather sign him up for less money. Nick Riewoldt is 30 this year and on just short of 1 million. Personally I'd rather give him an extra year or 2 for less money. Try get him for say 6/7 years on 700/750k and pay him 1million in the first year or so as to get majority of it out the way. That way Trav gets his big contract. We get a gun CHF and when others come asking for a similar pay rise its only 700-750 per year and we aren't having to pay multiple players 900k-1mill per year. Added bonus we wouldn't have to negotiate another contract with his dad.

Lets say we offered him 750k per year for 6 which totals 4.5million. Pay him 1 mill first 2 years. Which leaves 2.5 for remaining 4 years so doesn't bust our cap open. Maybe pay him 750k for the next 2. Then 600k then you only owe him 400k by the last year.
 
They play different roles. Jack is a better goal kicker while Trav is better further up the ground and a great mark. In fact they compliment each other pretty much perfectly. The Pies apparently offered 3.7 mill with the last 500k performance based.

Now I'm just reading between the lines of what Craig Cameron said yesterday but I took it as we can afford to match the reported figures of the Melbourne and Freo offers but it sounded like we'd rather sign him up for less money. Nick Riewoldt is 30 this year and on just short of 1 million. Personally I'd rather give him an extra year or 2 for less money. Try get him for say 6/7 years on 700/750k and pay him 1million in the first year or so as to get majority of it out the way. That way Trav gets his big contract. We get a gun CHF and when others come asking for a similar pay rise its only 700-750 per year and we aren't having to pay multiple players 900k-1mill per year. Added bonus we wouldn't have to negotiate another contract with his dad.

Lets say we offered him 750k per year for 6 which totals 4.5million. Pay him 1 mill first 2 years. Which leaves 2.5 for remaining 4 years so doesn't bust our cap open. Maybe pay him 750k for the next 2. Then 600k then you only owe him 400k by the last year.

His old man says NO!

Can't believe the hysteria that his old man has created, he wanted to extract as much coin as possible out of Collingwood and in doing so he has created a bidding war for a bargain basement player who will come with all the baggage he has now plus more. Imagine the pressure on him and the club that has him next year to get good return for their investment. It will be tremendous from a bloke who has many limitations. If he can't do it at Collingwood with Pendles, Swan, Thomas, Beams etc supplying him then why will he be any better with us?
 
His old man says NO!

Can't believe the hysteria that his old man has created, he wanted to extract as much coin as possible out of Collingwood and in doing so he has created a bidding war for a bargain basement player who will come with all the baggage he has now plus more. Imagine the pressure on him and the club that has him next year to get good return for their investment. It will be tremendous from a bloke who has many limitations. If he can't do it at Collingwood with Pendles, Swan, Thomas, Beams etc supplying him then why will he be any better with us?

How do you know he'll say know. It's 800k more than Collingwood without the performance clause plus he gets an extra year (gives him stability till pretty much end of his career). What do you mean if he can't do it at Collingwood? His form isn't even that bad this year. He's taken 20 more marks than Jack. Leads the league in contested marks and has still kicked 35 goals. He's not a FF. He's a leading CHF. Then you look back to last year when he dominated. Gotta love how people think he's a dud. Probably need to watch some more Collingwood games.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

One side question to this. Does anyone actually believe Travis will really leave the Pies?

They raised a decent point on AW last night. If he does switch, the pressure on him at the new club will be immense. Imagine if he comes to Tigerland for $900k per year, do you seriously think we will be happy with one goal per year? If that happened for 6 months we would be tearing the joint down.

Thinking about it, I actually agree with them, he may not be the type who can cope with or really wants this kind of pressure.
 
One side question to this. Does anyone actually believe Travis will really leave the Pies?

They raised a decent point on AW last night. If he does switch, the pressure on him at the new club will be immense. Imagine if he comes to Tigerland for $900k per year, do you seriously think we will be happy with one goal per year? If that happened for 6 months we would be tearing the joint down.

Thinking about it, I actually agree with them, he may not be the type who can cope with or really wants this kind of pressure.

1. I'd be a little disappointed :p
2. He should go to Melbourne then. :p
 
They play different roles. Jack is a better goal kicker while Trav is better further up the ground and a great mark. In fact they compliment each other pretty much perfectly. The Pies apparently offered 3.7 mill with the last 500k performance based.

Now I'm just reading between the lines of what Craig Cameron said yesterday but I took it as we can afford to match the reported figures of the Melbourne and Freo offers but it sounded like we'd rather sign him up for less money. Nick Riewoldt is 30 this year and on just short of 1 million. Personally I'd rather give him an extra year or 2 for less money. Try get him for say 6/7 years on 700/750k and pay him 1million in the first year or so as to get majority of it out the way. That way Trav gets his big contract. We get a gun CHF and when others come asking for a similar pay rise its only 700-750 per year and we aren't having to pay multiple players 900k-1mill per year. Added bonus we wouldn't have to negotiate another contract with his dad.

Lets say we offered him 750k per year for 6 which totals 4.5million. Pay him 1 mill first 2 years. Which leaves 2.5 for remaining 4 years so doesn't bust our cap open. Maybe pay him 750k for the next 2. Then 600k then you only owe him 400k by the last year.
I did say solely on goal kicking , Jack would have a good case to ask for a similar contract .
The Cloke sons have a bit of a record of having break out seasons and never reaching anything like it again and it's not as thought he is tearing it up in a side which has a poor midfield .
 
As ridiculous as the notion of Fevola is or Even Plugger lol it puts things clearly into perspective I think.

You could spend $1m on Cloke for say 50-60 goals and the chance to divide your club.
You could spend $80,000 on Fev for about the same.
We also paid peanuts for Cousins. But who was taken with the pick directly after we used ours on Ben? Tom Rockliff, that's who.
While the Cousins pickup was not a disaster by any means, I would hope the club has learned that getting in players for one or two years just isn't worth it in the long run.
As I type, Cousins is spiralling into an abyss and Rockliff is...well, quite frankly a gun and will be for the next 7 or 8 years.
 
I did say solely on goal kicking , Jack would have a good case to ask for a similar contract .
The Cloke sons have a bit of a record of having break out seasons and never reaching anything like it again and it's not as thought he is tearing it up in a side which has a poor midfield .
I saw you had written that and that's why I said at the same time Trav's a better mark. I think Jack is probably worth up around that 700k mark if he can find his 2010 form again and I think Travis would help that. He himself would have better help in our forward line than theirs. Dawes' man is playing on Cloke this year. I also feel people are getting carried away with the poor form comments. Statistically he is only down about 2 possessions 1.5 marks and half a goal on last year while he is still leading the comp for contested marks with 2 guys on him all day and his goal tally is still his 2nd best on average.
 
We also paid peanuts for Cousins. But who was taken with the pick directly after we used ours on Ben? Tom Rockliff, that's who.
While the Cousins pickup was not a disaster by any means, I would hope the club has learned that getting in players for one or two years just isn't worth it in the long run.
As I type, Cousins is spiralling into an abyss and Rockliff is...well, quite frankly a gun and will be for the next 7 or 8 years.

Rockliff went the pick before Cousins Tugg.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Rockliff went the pick before Cousins Tugg.
Thanks. I stand corrected on that,but I don't shy away from the gist of what I said. I am deadset against stop gap measures. I am not overly keen on Cloke, but at least he isn't a stop-gap measure. Fevola? Holy crap. :confused:
 
Thanks. I stand corrected on that,but I don't shy away from the gist of what I said. I am deadset against stop gap measures. I am not overly keen on Cloke, but at least he isn't a stop-gap measure. Fevola? Holy crap. :confused:
Yer no Fevola. Cuz was at least in shape to play AFL footy. Fev wouldn't last in VFL the size of him.:eek:
 

Dayne Beams, Sharrod Wellingham and Ben Reid have been confirmed by Collingwood football club as the newest players to recommit to the club, following Steele Sidebottom, Heath Shaw, Scott Pendlebury, Luke ball, Lachie Keefe and Jarryd Blair earlier in the year.



running out of room at collingwood one would suspect.
 
Dayne Beams, Sharrod Wellingham and Ben Reid have been confirmed by Collingwood football club as the newest players to recommit to the club, following Steele Sidebottom, Heath Shaw, Scott Pendlebury, Luke ball, Lachie Keefe and Jarryd Blair earlier in the year.


running out of room at collingwood one would suspect.
Not much closet space is there?
I can't see the Pies upping the offer to keep him. If talks have broken down, Cloke either reconsiders and accepts the original offer that was made to him and swallows a bit of pride (something he should do, but Damir Cloke won't want to do) or he walks.
 
I saw you had written that and that's why I said at the same time Trav's a better mark. I think Jack is probably worth up around that 700k mark if he can find his 2010 form again and I think Travis would help that. He himself would have better help in our forward line than theirs. Dawes' man is playing on Cloke this year. I also feel people are getting carried away with the poor form comments. Statistically he is only down about 2 possessions 1.5 marks and half a goal on last year while he is still leading the comp for contested marks with 2 guys on him all day and his goal tally is still his 2nd best on average.
So Tigs I guess my point is , I agree if we are to play Cloke somewhere near 1ml Jack should recieve around 700k.
Martin would probably demand somewhere near that and I'd suspect Cotchin likewise. Can we fit 4 blokes on 700k +, with Lids already on around 600k as a developing side an continue to build depth. I am very much of the opinion that our best 22 is very very close to being a top 4 side. The issue is soon as injuries come we tapper off badly, adding Cloke is only going to add depth in area, it still isn't going to assist our midfield depth , should a Cotchin, Tuck , Martin get injured , or a KPD goes down.
Ivan, or one of Lids, Cotchin, Martin or Foley go down we are still in the shit regardless of if we have Cloke sitting at CHF. Cloke's not been grerat this year but COllingwoods midfield depth has seen them to continue to be a good side. Likewise Geelong haven't had dominate KPFs of recent times , but they've had remarkable midfield depth.
 
Dayne Beams, Sharrod Wellingham and Ben Reid have been confirmed by Collingwood football club as the newest players to recommit to the club, following Steele Sidebottom, Heath Shaw, Scott Pendlebury, Luke ball, Lachie Keefe and Jarryd Blair earlier in the year.


running out of room at collingwood one would suspect.

Yeah Goodie, the Collingwood administration are idiots aren't they. Why sign up all these players and leave poor Trav out in the cold? No wonder they are such an unsuccessful club.

If they really wanted to keep him - they would.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Travis Cloke

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top