chachi11
Hinkley - 13 years of Pus
That Westhoff deliberate...holy shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Id be doing more than a quite phone call. Go full Clarko and blast them as loud and publicly as we can.Still can't work out the Ladhams no free - If I was the PAFC i'd be ringing up with a please explain?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
LOL well saidCome here and say that..
Oh yeh, you can't.
Lol
We are Port Adelaide it won't happen.Id be doing more than a quite phone call. Go full Clarko and blast them as loud and publicly as we can.
Which one ?I was too love drunk (and regular drunk) with our performance last night to notice how bad that Ladhams free was. I have no idea what the umpire thought he seen there, that is purely bewildering.
That Westhoff deliberate...holy sh*t.
Being penalised in the ruck battle.Which one ?
- The won where he won the ruck battle and got penalised ?
- The one where he nearly had his fingers taken off and nothing was paid ?
- The one where he legs were taken out and nothing was paid ?
- The one where had was paid a free kick against for the above mentioned legs being taken out ?
What tackle.that was the right call though?
he made no attempt to break the tackle or keep the ball in play. He stopped and just walked over the boundary line. Not sure how much more deliberate can you get.
He could have done a much better job at disguising it. I wonder at what point the boundary umpire blew their whistle for out of bounds. If they blew it after he stopped trying to keep it in, it looks dodgy, if they blew it before, then throw it in.What tackle.
The free was because he didn't pretend for long enough after already taking the ball out. It should have been a ball up.
What tackle.
The free was because he didn't pretend for long enough after already taking the ball out. It should have been a ball up.
I think there was a 3rd incident as well which should of been a port free in that play.. but whistle blows free kick saints.. was utter bullshit and was seeing red.Ladhams kicking in danger followed by legs taken out... ‘nothing to see here’
And if the umpire sees a free directly related to the score review, can they pay it?For those who understand the rules better than I. How was the Membrey goal not kicking in danger?
the saints player didn’t really get a chance to tackle because Westhoff just walked it over.
it seemed pretty cut and dry to me.