Remove this Banner Ad

Europe War in Ukraine - Thread 4 - thread rules updated

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rotayjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the thread for discussing the War in Ukraine. Should you want to discuss the geopolitics, the history, or an interesting tangent, head over here:


If a post isn't directly concerning the events of the war or starts to derail the thread, report the post to us and we'll move it over there.

Seeing as multiple people seem to have forgotten, abuse is against the rules of BF. Continuous, page long attacks directed at a single poster in this thread will result in threadbans for a week from this point; doing so again once you have returned will make the bans permanent and will be escalated to infractions.

This thread still has misinformation rules, and occasionally you will be asked to demonstrate a claim you have made by moderation. If you cannot, you will be offered the opportunity to amend the post to reflect that it's opinion, to remove the post, or you will be threadbanned and infracted for sharing misinformation.

Addendum: from this point, use of any variant of the word 'orc' to describe combatants, politicians or russians in general will be deleted and the poster will receive a warning. If the behaviour continues, it will be escalated. Consider this fair warning.

Finally: If I see the word Nazi or Hitler being flung around, there had better have a good faith basis as to how it's applicable to the Russian invasion - as in, video/photographic evidence of POW camps designed to remove another ethnic group - or to the current Ukrainian army. If this does not occur, you will be threadbanned for posting off topic

This is a sensitive area, and I understand that this makes for fairly incensed conversation sometimes. This does not mean the rules do not apply, whether to a poster positing a Pro-Ukraine stance or a poster positing an alternative view.

Behave, people.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Imagine crops grown in this stuff

 
Article from the Lowry suggesting a democratic Ukraine with the current de facto borders, well protected
frontline and airspace is a better option than the continuing war of attrition. The author assumes the war will continue and assumes the desired degree of safety for Ukraine can be achieved.
 
Article from the Lowry suggesting a democratic Ukraine with the current de facto borders, well protected
frontline and airspace is a better option than the continuing war of attrition. The author assumes the war will continue and assumes the desired degree of safety for Ukraine can be achieved.
Democracies like Australia have a duty to support Ukraine, a fellow democracy. But they should also do this out of self-interest. Given that the United States has vacated the leadership of the democratic world, a global coalition of the willing to make both the stabilisation of the frontline and the postwar rebuilding of Ukraine possible might well turn out to be the first step to something else altogether: a global alliance of democracies who support each other in a world increasingly threatened by neo-imperialism, be it of the Russian, the Chinese, or the US variety.
 
I think that confirms that putin has something on donny and we know what that is

It's absolutely inconceivable a few years ago that the UK and Australia would be hit with trade tariffs and Russia is the only one who wasn't (despite their existing energy sanctions and oligarch laws)

Australia is the only one of their Allies to provide combat troops to all of the last 5 major wars the US has been involved in (WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq & Afghanistan)

The UK skipped Vietnam, Sth Korea was under Japanese control in WW2. NZ didn't go to Iraq. Canada didn't go to Vietnam and Iraq etc.

Not to mention AUKUS, 5-Eyes alliance etc. Not to mention Aus was also there in the trenches of France and Belgium with the US in WW1 also....

Bloody mental in isolation.

If there were any get out of jail free cards Trump could have played to the American people, it could have been Aus and the UK with 0% tariffs. Particularly seeing as both give more to the US than they receive via trade anyway, particularly with the support on historical defence..... it would have been such an easy sell.


What a huge diplomatic own goal.


As you said, I'm sure we will find out in the passing of time or history, what Putin and Russia have/had on him.
 
Last edited:

The rate of Russian advances in Ukraine has been steadily declining since November 2024, in part due to successful Ukrainian counterattacks in eastern Ukraine.
isw.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It's absolutely inconceivable a few years ago that the UK and Australia would be hit with trade tariffs and Russia is the only one who wasn't (despite their existing energy sanctions and oligarch laws)

Australia is the only one of their Allies to provide combat troops to all of the last 5 major wars the US has been involved in (WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq & Afghanistan)

The UK skipped Vietnam, Sth Korea was under Japanese control in WW2. NZ didn't go to Iraq. Canada didn't go to Vietnam and Iraq etc.

Not to mention AUKUS, 5-Eyes alliance etc. Not to mention Aus was also there in the trenches of France and Belgium with the US in WW1 also....

Bloody mental in isolation.

If there were any get out of jail free cards Trump could have played to the American people, it could have been Aus and the UK with 0% tariffs. Particularly seeing as both give more to the US than they receive via trade anyway, particularly with the support on historical defence..... it would have been such an easy sell.


What a huge diplomatic own goal.


As you said, I'm sure we will find out in the passing of time or history, what Putin and Russia have/had on him.
The UK had SAS troops in Vietnam helping the Americans behind the scenes, but they didn't sent any regular soldiers to there as their PM at the time Harold Wilson said it's a war that can't be won by us and the US and how right was he to say that as it was humiliation for us and the US to lose to a 3rd world country despite the spin that came out of Washington and Canberra, we and the US were defeated.
 
Article from the Lowry suggesting a democratic Ukraine with the current de facto borders, well protected
frontline and airspace is a better option than the continuing war of attrition. The author assumes the war will continue and assumes the desired degree of safety for Ukraine can be achieved.
A decent article, if a touch Orwellian in "redefining victory conditions"

Russia won't accept a peace deal if it means any foreign forces in Ukraine though. This was the final ultimatum before the full scale invasion, they're not going to back down(mostly) from that when they are winning

The first draft treaty, titled "Agreement on Measures to Ensure the Security of the Russian Federation and Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization",[23] included the following provisions, among others:
  • that NATO members commit to no further enlargement of the alliance, including in particular to Ukraine
  • that NATO deploy no forces or weapons in countries that joined the alliance after May 1997[a]
  • a ban on deployment of intermediate-range missiles in areas where they could reach the other side's territory
  • a ban on any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, or Central Asia
  • language on consultative mechanisms, such as the NATO–Russia Council, and on the establishment of a hotline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2021_Russian_ultimatum_to_NATO
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


The rate of Russian advances in Ukraine has been steadily declining since November 2024, in part due to successful Ukrainian counterattacks in eastern Ukraine.
View attachment 2276167
Ignoring the Kursk retake obvs.

It's fair to say they have slowed in the south east, the weather? I think a proper peace treaty isn't that far away, Odessa is a bridge too far unless the Americans abandon Ukraine
 
President Z claims two Chinese troops captured in Ukraine out of a group of 6 fighting together. Not sure what happened to the other 4, possibly victims of Mr Putin's meatgrinder. It will be interesting if this is confirmed and the details emerge.


I'm sure the PRC will say these are private citizens and nothing to do with the government to maintain plausible deniability. I'm equally sure that they would be there only with their governments permission.
 
Ignoring the Kursk retake obvs.

It's fair to say they have slowed in the south east, the weather? I think a proper peace treaty isn't that far away, Odessa is a bridge too far unless the Americans abandon Ukraine
The report does say “The rate of Russian advances in Ukraine”.

Anyway, Korean soldiers were needed to take back russian land.
The mighty russia needed foreign soldiers to return invaded land back to them. How can russia complain about Ukraine having foreign troops in Ukraine.

The 225th's experience is representative of the broader trajectory of North Korean combat performance in Kursk, Shyriaiev said, with North Koreans quickly becoming the leading element of Russia's attacks.
"They were always used in assault, and the Russians are then used to secure the ground that the Koreans have taken," he said.
 
A decent article, if a touch Orwellian in "redefining victory conditions"

Russia won't accept a peace deal if it means any foreign forces in Ukraine though. This was the final ultimatum before the full scale invasion, they're not going to back down(mostly) from that when they are winning

The first draft treaty, titled "Agreement on Measures to Ensure the Security of the Russian Federation and Member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization",[23] included the following provisions, among others:
  • that NATO members commit to no further enlargement of the alliance, including in particular to Ukraine
  • that NATO deploy no forces or weapons in countries that joined the alliance after May 1997[a]
  • a ban on deployment of intermediate-range missiles in areas where they could reach the other side's territory
  • a ban on any NATO military activity in Ukraine, Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, or Central Asia
  • language on consultative mechanisms, such as the NATO–Russia Council, and on the establishment of a hotline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/December_2021_Russian_ultimatum_to_NATO
What has foreign forces being in Ukraine to do with Russia?
 
The report does say “The rate of Russian advances in Ukraine”.

Anyway, Korean soldiers were needed to take back russian land.
The mighty russia needed foreign soldiers to return invaded land back to them. How can russia complain about Ukraine having foreign troops in Ukraine.

The 225th's experience is representative of the broader trajectory of North Korean combat performance in Kursk, Shyriaiev said, with North Koreans quickly becoming the leading element of Russia's attacks.
"They were always used in assault, and the Russians are then used to secure the ground that the Koreans have taken," he said.
I mean, NK and Russia have a mutual defence treaty, that's kinda the point

It's not that they can or can't complain about foreign troops. "Putin is embarrassed, they required Korean etc etc", these things are appeals to emotion and mean nothing

Russia just won't sign a peace deal without a explicit ban on foreign troops in the country, like in the constitution
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom