- Joined
- Sep 27, 2004
- Posts
- 60,482
- Reaction score
- 15,668
- Location
- Dr Geoffrey Edelsten's jacuzzi
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #26
Of course he's two years away from hitting his peak, he's a skinny ruckman who needs another ten kilograms to compete with the best who weight 110 kgs.
I don't know why you're finding fault in that game when it wasn't his best according to Fremantle fans.
People are too quick to find faults in players and overlook the things they can do well.
Warnock is mobile, a giant, can palm the ball well, didn't have to jump to beat the 200 cm King and can read the play going by the marks he took in defence.
I don't know why you would want White or want to rely on Cloke's dodgy shoulders next years.
We'll be thrashing he young and inexperienced Kreuzer and Hampson in the ruck for the next two to three years if they fail like Ackland and Mclaren.
We could easily play Kreuzer and Warnock on the ground at the same time when both are mobile ruckman.
Rotations and depth in the ruck is very important if you look at the rucks on the lists of clubs who have won flags since Essendon's last flag. You can't get by with a Barnes and a spud such as Alessio with the new centre circle killing off rucks like White.
I'd take a Simon Taylor or even a Mark Seaby before I would even look at White.
After reading this board, I always wonder if people on here know as much as they think they do with the shite that gets posted on here...
Why would the Blues chase Warnock if he wasn't that good?
Who let Pagan onto BigFooty when no one wants a tap ruckman again?

Warnock is easily more talented than French who always his gave his all in games and cost us a first round pick. Warnock would easily be drafted with a pick in the first 20 or 25 picks if he was in this draft.
Carlton aren't drafting Warnock for just next year.
We're chasing Warnock because he can play for at least five years and will hit his peak when the side is ready to challenge for a flag.
Ruckman who are 206 cms tall don't grow on trees.
If you can't see the potential and upside in Warnock, you should spend most of your time in The Blue Room talking crap.
I don't know why you're finding fault in that game when it wasn't his best according to Fremantle fans.
People are too quick to find faults in players and overlook the things they can do well.
Warnock is mobile, a giant, can palm the ball well, didn't have to jump to beat the 200 cm King and can read the play going by the marks he took in defence.
I don't know why you would want White or want to rely on Cloke's dodgy shoulders next years.
We'll be thrashing he young and inexperienced Kreuzer and Hampson in the ruck for the next two to three years if they fail like Ackland and Mclaren.
We could easily play Kreuzer and Warnock on the ground at the same time when both are mobile ruckman.
Rotations and depth in the ruck is very important if you look at the rucks on the lists of clubs who have won flags since Essendon's last flag. You can't get by with a Barnes and a spud such as Alessio with the new centre circle killing off rucks like White.
I'd take a Simon Taylor or even a Mark Seaby before I would even look at White.
After reading this board, I always wonder if people on here know as much as they think they do with the shite that gets posted on here...
Why would the Blues chase Warnock if he wasn't that good?
Who let Pagan onto BigFooty when no one wants a tap ruckman again?

Warnock is easily more talented than French who always his gave his all in games and cost us a first round pick. Warnock would easily be drafted with a pick in the first 20 or 25 picks if he was in this draft.
Carlton aren't drafting Warnock for just next year.
We're chasing Warnock because he can play for at least five years and will hit his peak when the side is ready to challenge for a flag.
Ruckman who are 206 cms tall don't grow on trees.
If you can't see the potential and upside in Warnock, you should spend most of your time in The Blue Room talking crap.






