Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Was that Gaffs last game for WC?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

are you a narcissist? Because it looks like you are taking great pleasure in watching Gaff suffer here.
He is a lawyer, so by definition he is someone who obviously has some work ethic or ability to learn but choose to not put it to any good use and decided to be a scum sucking leech on society.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Grace: "My submission is you should impose a penalty at the lower end of the range, which commences at three years..."

"... I mean three weeks."

Oops.

Grace get herself confuse ?
 
Excellent analysis and submission by Gleeson wasn’t it

Yeah. He set Gaff up for that one during Cross.

Gleeson: You were frustrated and accordingly lashed out, weren't you?
Gaff: No, that's not true!

(Later on, in closing)

Gleeson: The evidence from Gaff was that he launched the blow clear headed, and without frustration...

Brilliant.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah. He set Gaff up for that one during Cross.

Gleeson: You were frustrated and accordingly lashed out, weren't you?
Gaff: No, that's not true!

(Later on, in closing)

Gleeson: The evidence from Gaff was that he launched the blow clear headed, and without frustration...

Brilliant.

How did the defence let him walk into that
 
That guy can be quite withering in his submissions. In the Baker/Johnson hearing, he said Baker was "not much of a man", or words to that effect.
What do you expect from a lawyer?
 
Grace: "He's pleaded guilty, he's faced the music. He intended to punch him, just not in the face.

Head , chest , stomach now face .
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The defence is having an absolute shocker here, west coast hopefully hired one of those ‘no win no fee’ types. He’s doing Gaff absolutely no favours.

I cant believe he actually suggested 3 matches.

Yes, that's the minimum but clearly it isn't appropriate here. Neither is suggestions of 12, but come on.
 
Cannot believe they aren’t just rocking up and accepting their punishment. All this conflated bullshit, remorse, gaff being targeted afterwards.. get stuffed.

They didn’t turn up and admit full guilt, give him the highest penalty.
Play his entire career at West Coast?

Too cruel.
 
Did his own lawyer just contradict him?

“He intended to punch him, just not in the face.”

Didnt Gaff say he only intended to push him?
The coverage has indicated that Gaff has said both. But he wasn't grilled about this apparent inconsistency by the AFL's counsel (unlike the stomach/chest inconsistency). Which leads me to conclude there is some inaccuracies in the reporting.
 
If he comes to Melbourne I will giving to him as well.

At first I though you dog.

Then I brought the story he was aiming for shoulder/chest.

Then hearing Gaff say that he went for the stomach in the tribunal and changes to chest again.

As for being a good person I brought that too until he start lying to the tribunal.

Blames the dockers from blocking him from the ball. How much does that happen in a game? West Coast were doing worse to Neale but if Neale king hit somebody, I would be supporting him.

Yep.. He's gonna have to wear the consequences of his actions. ..just like everyone else. . .But from his point of view he's better off leaving WA
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Was that Gaffs last game for WC?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top