Weitering on Toby Greene, is he in trouble?

[Andre the Giant]

Enlighten me

Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.

 

[Fitzey]

Can't agree.

I don’t expect you to agree, you support Carlton and need Weitering to win.

 

[VicBased]

Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Interesting that two people have answered but haven't clarified anything.
The question isn't hard.

 

[VicBased]

Don’t hold your breath, he’s not the sharpest tool in the shed.

I hope you guys take it all this year, good luck.

 

[Cripps 'n' Blue Bloods]

Interesting that two people have answered but haven't clarified anything.
The question isn't hard.

Haven't clarified anything?
I thought you were being deliberately obtuse when you replied...

He was fined for a poor choice of words?

Were you serious? If so, it was basically just a poor choice of words by Sam Edmund in the tweet that was quoted.
Weitering DID have a case to answer. He was found guilty.
Edmund just poorly distinguished a fine vs a suspension as 'no case to answer'.

Not much to it really. Thought it was pretty obvious.

 

[VicBased]

Haven't clarified anything?
I thought you were being deliberately obtuse when you replied...


Were you serious? If so, it was basically just a poor choice of words by Sam Edmund in the tweet that was quoted.
Weitering DID have a case to answer. He was found guilty.
Edmund just poorly distinguished a fine vs a suspension as 'no case to answer'.

Not much to it really. Thought it was pretty obvious.

So guilty of an eye gouge?

 

[Elixuh]

Jacob wietering will gouge again. He must be brought to justice.

 

[Elmer_Judd]

#VICBIAS at it again apparently !!!

#vicsdoitbetter

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

If there is no case to answer why did he get fined.? That doesn't make sense.

It wasn't an eye gouge, but it was contact to the face.

 

[Neese]

Thanks for the laughs everyone who isn't a Carlton supporter. Your hypocritical melts are delicious. Go Blues

 

[Chief]

I don’t expect you to agree, you support Carlton and need Weitering to win.

And I can see what happened. There's that.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Jacob wietering will gouge again. He must be brought to justice.

You're lucky you can still see in order to post this. Jacob obviously doesn't know where you live yet.

 

[Brighton_Diggins]

nothing in this at all. crikey what a joke.

 

[JyeDye]

Just saw Weitering out on the street already back to his eye gauging ways, this time an innocent old lady. The bail system is a joke in this country.

 

[BallaratBulldog]

Correct decision given Greene got off eye gouging the first time

 

[Elmer_Judd]

Toby should take a page out of Curly Howard's book in future

 

[Lyttelton Ranger]

I hate Carlton just as much as the next Carlton hater.
um, that's all I wanted to say.




...no but seriously, anyone that says there was any malicious intent by Weitering is kidding themselves.
He was clearly trying to get purchase on Toby's shoulder and missed.

 

[Cripps 'n' Blue Bloods]

So guilty of an eye gouge?

Sorry, are still being obtuse?
There is no charge of eye gouging.
It's unnecessary or unreasonable contact to the eye region.
Graded careless, low impact and high contact. Which is a fine under the current guidelines.

So he was found guilty of careless, unnecessary, low impact contact with the eye region. Not a gouge, no.

 

[Cripps 'n' Blue Bloods]

Jacob wietering will gouge again. He must be brought to justice.

Won't somebody think of the children?

 

[Elixuh]

You're lucky you can still see in order to post this. Jacob obviously doesn't know where you live yet.

I don’t stay in the same place for more than 24hrs

 

[VicBased]

Sorry, are still being obtuse?
There is no charge of eye gouging.
It's unnecessary or unreasonable contact to the eye region.
Graded careless, low impact and high contact. Which is a fine under the current guidelines.

So he was found guilty of careless, unnecessary, low impact contact with the eye region. Not a gouge, no.

Wording hey

 

[Elixuh]

Sorry, are still being obtuse?
There is no charge of eye gouging.
It's unnecessary or unreasonable contact to the eye region.
Graded careless, low impact and high contact. Which is a fine under the current guidelines.

So he was found guilty of careless, unnecessary, low impact contact with the eye region. Not a gouge, no.

So he’s a low impact eye gouger

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

I don’t stay in the same place for more than 24hrs

Weitering is part cyborg though. I'd go underground if I was you.

 

[Elixuh]

Weitering is part cyborg though. I'd go underground if I was you.

Nice try. If he was part cyborg he wouldn’t have fallen for the old person internet scam.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Nice try. If he was part cyborg he wouldn’t have fallen for the old person internet scam.

I don't think cyborgs are street smart.