sabre_ac said:Yes we are undermanned I realise that but....
In my opinion I still believe we had the players to cover the loss of Haddrill,Polak and Carr.
McPharlin, Parker, Thornton and even longmuir are enough in my opinion to cover the tigers backline.
So the question is where does the problem lie?
Is it our game plan (Coach)?
Is it our lack of discpline (Coach)?
Is it our forward line (List)?
Is it our midfield (List)?
Is it out depth (List)?
My opinion is at full strength we are a top four side, we have finally got the midfield to run with the best of them. Our backline is one of the strongest and forwad line wise if we could get it working could be potent. Some say we are too reliant on Pavlich, but from what I see we dont kick it to him enough. Murphy just needs to be left to develop and I believe Longmuir needs to be played up forward more often.
So as I see it, it is our game plan. Untill we play accountable football we wont be a force in the afl. Chipping and kicking it sideways isnt getting us anywhere and finishing 6th and below and we have failed again this season.
Possible ways to rectify the situation?
GET AN EXPERIENCED COACH!
Sheedy is out of sorts at Essendon perhaps he is an option?
Or maybe entice another coach out of retirement?
I havent attacked Conolly much this year but I think it is becoming pretty evident that our problem is our coach.
For me today, being undermanned was not an excuse. Being undermanned doesn't make people drop chest marks and miss targets with hand and foot at will. I was happy with Murphy today given the lack of genuine delivery in the forward line and our tactic of depriving our forwards of an even contest by playing an ultra defensive brand of footy.
The Warning signs were there last year when we persisted with playing a spare man in defense last year, leaving their spare man to kill us in defense. It cost us the game against the roos, where king belted us and it also cost us the game against port last year. While I'm not all against this tactic, when it doesn't work, it really costs us. However it doesn't seem that CC is very flexible when it comes to changing the gameplan. If we're getting badly beaten using that tactic, you would think that you should at least try and change the tactic, wouldn't you. It also makes me wonder if this adds to our lack of accountability in our forward line, our players simply have more options to cover and are just not up to it, add to that sandilands and we're effectively outnumbered by 2 mobile players when the ball hits the ground, allowing them to rebound from defense.
While I recognise that this tactic can allow us to clog up space in the oppositions forward line, on days like today it was more of a hinderance than an advantage. We had little problem getting it just forward of CHB, but once we got there we just had nowhere to go. Without any genuine run off half back, we were sitting ducks.
It really shows a lack of flexability in the matchday methods of the coach when the gameplan is simply left to run it's couse, whether it is working or not. In the lead up to the game CC was fuming about Wallace saying that we were fragile and played unaccountable footy, you would think that he would at least structure the game and actually make it possible for our blokes to have a man. Until we actually do this, it becomes harder to see which players are playing unaccoutable footy and which players are adhering to team rules.
This is not to say that I don't think CC can be a good coach, infact I think he can. But at the moment he seems to be making the same mistakes and not doing anything about it. In the past few weeks he has really tried to defend the players and their performances..... "it's super dissapointing" and the like. Perhaps this week he needs to the hard on the blokes and get them down for an early morning session etc. I think most dockers supporters are just frustrated that after a loss it is always just the same old thing.








