If we played LJ when we should've, maybe he wouldn't have busted his knee cap![]()
Stop it Kingy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If we played LJ when we should've, maybe he wouldn't have busted his knee cap![]()
More likely Sando and Milburn not listening IMO...I just wonder if there are people around Sando left over from the Craig era giving him Craig like advice. And without Bailey this background noise is disruptive. ?
Anyone hear Doc Clarke on the radio this morning? Big fella actually fired up after some probing from Rucci, especially about the Crows reserves team. Was good to listen too.
Anyway, he got asked specifically about Deledio. Clarke said that Deledio, Cotchin and Martin had all been rotating through the midfield and half forward recently. So their planning was towards that, and the forwards' pre-game instructions was about making Newman and Houli accountable and preventing them from mopping up at the back.
Then Richmond changed it up by having Deledio across half back.
Rooch queried why did it take a quarter and a half to do something about it and Clarke said that the very first message of the game that went out was to the forwards, telling them that Deledio was now their No 1 defensive target and that they needed to round him up.
He said the responsibility wasn't directed to a single player, but to the forward line as a group. Eg whoever Deledio lined up on was responsible for making him accountable. Obviously didn't happen.
Points to a lack of onfield leadership in the forward line. Also perhaps too many non-forwards rotating through there without the smarts. Perhaps also too many players playing as individuals and worrying about their spots rather than filling the team-first, sacrificial roles. Too much faith from the coaches' box in the players to sort it out on the ground as well. Also Bickley in a role he isn't suited to. And Sando not being decisive enough to make a call early.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Wouldn't surprise me, given that his replacement (Jaensch) was clearly even worse.My money is on Radar doing a Porpy and that is he will return to the side without playing a game
Good point I reckon. It's only natural that Craig would have had a significant impact on Bickley, Clarke, Campo. Clarke churned out a few Neil Craig specials on the radio this morning (fierce determination was in there). When under pressure, you go back to what you know.I just wonder if there are people around Sando left over from the Craig era giving him Craig like advice. And without Bailey this background noise is disruptive. ?
I was worried when I heard Sando saying stuff like "the effort is there, but not the intensity" - which is Craig-speak nothingness.
Wouldn't surprise me, given that his replacement (Jaensch) was clearly even worse.
Good point I reckon. It's only natural that Craig would have had a significant impact on Bickley, Clarke, Campo. Clarke churned out a few Neil Craig specials on the radio this morning (fierce determination was in there). When under pressure, you go back to what you know.
Wood Duck is spot on. Need more fresh blood in the coaching box.
I was worried when I heard Sando saying stuff like "the effort is there, but not the intensity" - which is Craig-speak nothingness.
I think it means "I don't know why we're playing badly"WTF does that even mean?
This is where our on field leadership breaks down IMO.
If it was Thommo's man, surely as VC he either looks after him or he tells someone else too.
Or the captain goes over to him or tells someone else too. I couldn't imagine Hodge letting Deledio run around all day by himself.
Hodge would try and flatten him the first chance he got...
That's not tough football - didn't you watch Neil's DVD?
He said the responsibility wasn't directed to a single player, but to the forward line as a group. Eg whoever Deledio lined up on was responsible for making him accountable. Obviously didn't happen.
Points to a lack of onfield leadership in the forward line. Also perhaps too many non-forwards rotating through there without the smarts. Perhaps also too many players playing as individuals and worrying about their spots rather than filling the team-first, sacrificial roles. Too much faith from the coaches' box in the players to sort it out on the ground as well. Also Bickley in a role he isn't suited to. And Sando not being decisive enough to make a call early.
This is 100% on the coaches box. What a balls-up. You don't send a generic message to a "group" of players, unless it's something like, there's two minutes to go, or, change the tempo of the game.
In this instance there needed to be a clear instruction to an INDIVIDUAL to man up on Deledio. There should have been no doubt in the individual's mind that this was his job, and there should have been no doubt in the minds of the coaches that this instruction had been issued to an individual and it was to be acted on. What a schoolboy error in communication from the coaches box - and the result was there for all to see.
I liked Doc's interview. He was a feisty little minx. But he also completely failed to take responsibility (on behalf of the coaches) for the errors on Saturday and the direction of the season as a whole. The Deledio excuse was laughable: 'We weren't expecting him back there and, besides, we told the players, so what can you do?' Also pulled out the 'we're only one game out of the eight' line and reckons the team is only a 'little bit out of form'.
Basically, what would give me some hope as a supporter, is a statement along the lines of...'We've made some errors this year, but we've got two weeks and we're going to change what we need to and get it right.' Instead it's all, 'Nothing to see here. Steady as she goes. It'll come good.'