Who has more potential

[rota69]

Which of these two players has the potential to be a star for their new club?

 

[davey_magik]

Tarrant, on the basis that he will get far better delivery at Freo than Polak at Richmond, though Polak will probably be played in defense.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

The current poll result just shows how ****ed up bigfooty is.

 

[Polo_14]

The current poll result just shows how ****ed up bigfooty is.

Why? Because people dare to have a different opinion to yourself??

 

[Kenny_01]

The current poll result just shows how ****ed up bigfooty is.

Haha, spot on.

But I think Polak will do well too.

 

[Kenny_01]

Why? Because people dare to have a different opinion to yourself??

No because everyone was calling Polak "Polhack" and now people are saying he is better than Tarrant.

Bigfootyites jump on bandwagons twice as quick as Robert Walls. 90% of posters on here just jump ship on the popular opinion at the time and don't make judgements for themselves.

 

[deano the hawka]

Polak is much (well not much) younger than tarrant, which in a way means that he has more potential.

Although he is playing in a ninth placed (averaged) team, he will have many years ahead of him in which to prove himself.

And it's not like he hasn't!

NO-ONE and i mean NO-ONE can be picked that high in a super draft without being an important player, which shows that he has been good in regional areas, yet hasnt developed into the AFL level. He obviously hasn't reached his peak of performance, but that will come with experience.

Tarrant is actually a loss (IMO) for Freo, as evidence from 2001 to 2006.

For four of those five years (2001-2005), he was leading goalkicker in collingwood against the likes of Cummings, A.Rocca etc. with an AA selection in 2003. This year, he has:

1. Terrible accuracy.
2. Low amount of high number of goal bags (if any)
3.Gone out of form nearly everyweek after getting back into form
and the list goes on and on!

This is evidence that he has reached his peak and won't be doing any better with Freo.

THoughts

 

[raffrox]

Polak is much (well not much) younger than tarrant, which in a way means that he has more potential.

Although he is playing in a ninth placed (averaged) team, he will have many years ahead of him in which to prove himself.

And it's not like he hasn't!

NO-ONE and i mean NO-ONE can be picked that high in a super draft without being an important player, which shows that he has been good in regional areas, yet hasnt developed into the AFL level. He obviously hasn't reached his peak of performance, but that will come with experience.

Tarrant is actually a loss (IMO) for Freo, as evidence from 2001 to 2006.

For four of those five years (2001-2005), he was leading goalkicker in collingwood against the likes of Cummings, A.Rocca etc. with an AA selection in 2003. This year, he has:

1. Terrible accuracy.
2. Low amount of high number of goal bags (if any)
3.Gone out of form nearly everyweek after getting back into form
and the list goes on and on!

This is evidence that he has reached his peak and won't be doing any better with Freo.

THoughts

By your reasoning. Polak was an ok player who couldn't kick but could take a mark in his first few years.

This year he couldn't even get a game still can't kick and didn't look as likely to take as many marks.

Therefore... Polak was always an average player and now he's on the decline and is a crab.

Sound fair.

 

[Heisenberg_]

The current poll result just shows how ****ed up bigfooty is.

or that people have a different opinion to you, or that you dont understand what the word potential means?