- Moderator
- #8,926
I have great admiration for Salman Rushdie.Writing a book 34 years ago is enough to keep Muslims riled up apparently.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have great admiration for Salman Rushdie.Writing a book 34 years ago is enough to keep Muslims riled up apparently.
I have great admiration for Salman Rushdie.
I was more an Asterix kid, an original Uderzo sketch of Geriatrix takes pride of place on my wall.
Writing a book 34 years ago is enough to keep Muslims riled up apparently.
I doubt anyone here is a fan of religious extremists.Rushdie will likely lose an eye, suffered severed nerves in an arm, and damage to his liver after he was stabbed. He's on a ventilator.
Iranian newspapers praised Sir Salman Rushdie’s “brave and dutiful” attacker for attempting to carry out the religious edict to kill the author of The Satanic Verses and send him “to Hell”.
This is a few years after Hitoshi Igarashi, the Japanese translator of The Satanic Verses, was stabbed to death.
The Italian translator Ettore Capriolo was knifed in his apartment in Milan.
William Nygaard, the novel’s Norwegian publisher, was shot three times in the back and left for dead outside his Oslo home.
The Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, was shot then butchered on an Amsterdam street after making a short film about the maltreatment of Muslim women in Holland.
The attack on the Charlie Hebdo office killed 12 people and injured 11 others for publishing satirical cartoons of Muhammad.
Rushdie will likely lose an eye, suffered severed nerves in an arm, and damage to his liver after he was stabbed. He's on a ventilator.
Iranian newspapers praised Sir Salman Rushdie’s “brave and dutiful” attacker for attempting to carry out the religious edict to kill the author of The Satanic Verses and send him “to Hell”.
This is a few years after Hitoshi Igarashi, the Japanese translator of The Satanic Verses, was stabbed to death.
The Italian translator Ettore Capriolo was knifed in his apartment in Milan.
William Nygaard, the novel’s Norwegian publisher, was shot three times in the back and left for dead outside his Oslo home.
The Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh, was shot then butchered on an Amsterdam street after making a short film about the maltreatment of Muslim women in Holland.
The attack on the Charlie Hebdo office killed 12 people and injured 11 others for publishing satirical cartoons of Muhammad.
The holy books require interpretation and are often vague in meaning. Moderate sects claim extremists have it wrong and vice versa. I'm not convinced banning religions would be effective and doing so would breech human rights.religion is a great fuel to mobilise the lunatics in our society to achieve a mischievous end
I don't know why we tolerate any religion that promotes any activity outside of the laws of the land
(including discrimination)
The holy books require interpretation and are often vague in meaning. Moderate sects claim extremists have it wrong and vice versa. I'm not convinced banning religions would be effective and doing so would breech human rights.
I thought atheism was winning the war for minds, especially in the West, but developments in the US make me question the level of progress. Islam is a more difficult problem than Christianity because its usually tied to culture.
You can't really say that any major religion is promoting breaking the law when differing interpretations exist. Moderate believers will say the bad actors aren't true believers.I'm not pro banning religion but I don't believe turning a blind eye to religions that promote breaking the law is acceptable
scomo's "let's let religions discriminate bill" is an example of the opposite I'd like to see
If you read the Koran, and somebody told you that they thought it was the literal will of God and that they took it all literally, they should be locked up for being a danger to most of society.You can't really say that any major religion is promoting breaking the law when differing interpretations exist. Moderate believers will say the bad actors aren't true believers.
We've gone too far already in protecting believers so there's no need for further legislation to defend them. The LNP have sold out to religious nutters.
The bible is equally bloodthirsty with passages about killing homosexuals. Secular society has molded mainstream Christianity to a point that the wackos are more interested in your money than stoning you for being gay. Islam hasn't had the benefit of being buffered by secular society so they're further behind. It's more difficult to influence Islam from the outside because of its ties to culture in the Arab world.If you read the Koran, and somebody told you that they thought it was the literal will of God and that they took it all literally, they should be locked up for being a danger to most of society.
It's not banning religion, it's banning people from admitting they want to commit genocide and execute gay people (homo-sexuality is a major sin in Islam).
If somebody says they think the Bible or Quran is literally the will of God, they shouldn't be allowed guns, knives etc.
The fact we let them spout this nonsense without controls is clearly an absurd historic notion.
The Quran gives you the special out that if you die doing something holy (no matter how awful), you're rewarded for it. Martyrdom in Christianity is less rewarding.
The bible is equally bloodthirsty with passages about killing homosexuals. Secular society has molded mainstream Christianity to a point that the wackos are more interested in your money than stoning you for being gay. Islam hasn't had the benefit of being buffered by secular society so they're further behind. It's more difficult to influence Islam from the outside because of its ties to culture in the Arab world.
I don't see how banning a literal interpretation of religious books is possible. Mainstream fundamentalist Christians such as Hillsong believers would claim they believe in a literal interpretation.
Islam raises its barbarous head yet again.
Australian man faces flogging after alleged naked rampage in Sharia law region
An Australian man accused of a drunken naked rampage in Indonesia's most conservative province says he felt "almost possessed" during the incident.www.abc.net.au
Oh Singapore canes people and it gets praised for it.Singapore canes dickheads and is praised for maintaining a safe, secure country where people have respect for law.
A bogan dickhead goes in a violent drunken rampage in Indonesia, looks at the same punishment and suddenly its “Islam is barbarous”?
First off, it isn't Islam but the culture of which Islam is one factorIslam raises its barbarous head yet again.
Australian man faces flogging after alleged naked rampage in Sharia law region
An Australian man accused of a drunken naked rampage in Indonesia's most conservative province says he felt "almost possessed" during the incident.www.abc.net.au
Probably an indictment too of Australia and how far we have moved away from individuals taking responsibility of actions.
Being a tradie is seen as a more noble career than a university lecturer in some circles.
Islam raises its barbarous head yet again.
Australian man faces flogging after alleged naked rampage in Sharia law region
An Australian man accused of a drunken naked rampage in Indonesia's most conservative province says he felt "almost possessed" during the incident.www.abc.net.au
Sounds like a real goose. A few hits with a cane would be good for him though doubt it will come to that - the Indonesians will just deport him most likely.