The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Moderator
- #576
#themoreyouknow
Yeah, as the article suggests, the spruiking a few years back about the 'firsts' ground their gears a little bit. Tony De Bolfo is a gem of a historian for us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
#themoreyouknow
Premiers: ???
Brownlow: daisy Pearce
Coleman: Tayla Harris
So the draw is flexible. They will do 7 H&A games and one final if teams prefer as opposed to 6 H&A and 2 finals.
That's a top 2 as opposed to a top 4 though. I'd probably rather put up with an unbalanced draw temporarily as I think 2 weeks of finals is more important.
Tayla has the better kicking action thoughPremiers: Fremantle (ie: the full WA state team)
Brownlow (the Debbie Lee medal?): Daisy Pearce... easily!
Coleman: Moana Hope... easily! *Currently has 55 goals from 8 games in the VFL Women's competition.
Of course they do but don't be too disappointed if not too many people watch it . And Ruby if its not entertaining( and entertaining is a broad term a close U/10 game can be entertaining if youre a parent or know the kids ) no one will pay to watch and it won't contribute one ioter to the game .There are many levels below AFL that would be a better standard than the womens game VFL VAFL country and suburban leagues 1sts and 2nds 3rds so if you are expecting people to watch the women purely because they are women and it is something different you are defeating the purpose in the first place of any notion of equality.Its insulting that you think that men have some sort of ownership over the game. Women are paying customers. Women are driving their sons to games. Women love footy. Women have as much right to play. And not just as your entertainment. It will lead to more growth to the game. But hey, I am sure AFL couldn't of done more research then you?
And I was referring to the some of the sexist men. Not every man. But if the shoe fits?
Its an insult to the thousands of young guys running around in country and suburban leagues playing for the love of the game and nothing else still producing a standard 20 times better than the women can ever hope to achieve.Sure, but they don't deserve 25k a year for playing that standard of football.
That's an insult in itself.
Of course they do but don't be too disappointed if not too many people watch it . And Ruby if its not entertaining( and entertaining is a broad term a close U/10 game can be entertaining if youre a parent or know the kids ) no one will pay to watch and it won't contribute one ioter to the game .There are many levels below AFL that would be a better standard than the womens game VFL VAFL country and suburban leagues 1sts and 2nds 3rds so if you are expecting people to watch the women purely because they are women and it is something different you are defeating the purpose in the first place of any notion of equality.
I'm interested in this point, which you make with such conviction. How do you know that? Are you already a follower of women's footy? One of the benefits of the new competition, and the affiliation with the established clubs, is that the women's teams will be exposed to all the facilities and structured training on offer at the clubs. If the standard starts off poor - and I have no idea if it will - it wont stay that way for long. These teams will attract the best female footballers in the country, and they will be trained and coached to extract their best.
You realise the standard of play of the player has nothing to do with what a player is worth? A player is worth what people are willing to pay them. This generally works against women, if it works for them in this instance, then I have no problem with that. If those guys really are insulted, then they can just suck it up, but I doubt very much that they are.Its an insult to the thousands of young guys running around in country and suburban leagues playing for the love of the game and nothing else still producing a standard 20 times better than the women can ever hope to achieve.
When do hawks get a Womens side?The successful teams will be announced today- 12 applicants, either 8 or 10 team comp. so who gets in and who misses?
Only 1 application from Qld, NSW, SA means they will prob get in (Lions, GWS & Crows) Both WA teams applied so at least 1 from there. That leaves the remaining licences for the Victorian applicants (Carlton, Collingwood, Geelong, Melbourne, North, Richmond, St Kilda, & Bulldogs). At least 2 of these will miss out. Would like to see both Melbourne & Bulldogs rewarded with teams given they have been playing women's matches for several years but not sure it will happen that way. Thoughts???
Hawthorn didn't apply so they'll be behind all those that didWhen do hawks get a Womens side?
Hard to understand where Richmonds bid went astray then, we have a very accessible ground in Punt Rd, a female president and we were involved in that first match, not to mention a large supporter base, but really I dont mind if we wait and see how things pan out.We were part of the first recorded women's match involving two VFL clubs.
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/2013-03-28/when-women-of-carlton-took-to-the-field
Maybe if you guys had have supported the concept then, we would be 80 years in by now!
Not really - They decided on four teams in Victoria; Melbourne and the Bulldogs were guaranteed due to their recent involvement in developing the women's game, Collingwood was guaranteed due to the size of the fanbase and the media exposure it would give them, and so it came down to Carlton vs. Richmond, a battle which Richmond lost in what was probably a bit of a toss up.Hard to understand where Richmonds bid went astray then
I would hope there was more to Collingwoods bid than just numbers and Im sure there was but really it is what it is, hoping we join next year, I love any team in the old Yellow and Black.Not really - They decided on four teams in Victoria; Melbourne and the Bulldogs were guaranteed due to their recent involvement in developing the women's game, Collingwood was guaranteed due to the size of the fanbase and the media exposure it would give them, and so it came down to Carlton vs. Richmond, a battle which Richmond lost in what was probably a bit of a toss up.
Not really - They decided on four teams in Victoria; Melbourne and the Bulldogs were guaranteed due to their recent involvement in developing the women's game, Collingwood was guaranteed due to the size of the fanbase and the media exposure it would give them, and so it came down to Carlton vs. Richmond, a battle which Richmond lost in what was probably a bit of a toss up.
Its an insult to the thousands of young guys running around in country and suburban leagues playing for the love of the game and nothing else still producing a standard 20 times better than the women can ever hope to achieve.
Hard to understand where Richmonds bid went astray then, we have a very accessible ground in Punt Rd, a female president and we were involved in that first match, not to mention a large supporter base, but really I dont mind if we wait and see how things pan out.
Without knowing what each clubs bids were its hard to complain about the outcome.
I don't see women as inferior at all .I'm all for equality in the workplace ,I just see them as inferior football players and the womens AFL a complete waste of time and money all for the sake of the AFL maintaining political correctness.It must be hard for you watching the Olympics, with all those women getting medals the same as the men, when they really should be half a medal maximum to fit with your perception of their inferior status.
Thinking that adult women should be paid nothing for competing in a national competition, the same as boys living at home playing amateur footy, hardy qualifies as thinking at all.
That would only apply if they played against men. Saying women in a female only sport competition are inferior to men is actually saying women are inferior. And as the previous post says, in almost all Olympic contests, female results are slower, shorter, lighter etc than men's.I don't see women as inferior at all .I'm all for equality in the workplace ,I just see them as inferior football players and the womens AFL a complete waste of time and money all for the sake of the AFL maintaining political correctness.
Of course there was - We're the best resourced club in the AFL across a range of criteria, we've got a centrally-located and world-class training facility that has already housed both our AFL side and the Melbourne Vixens (until recently), and will now have our own national league netball team to go along with the Women's league side.I would hope there was more to Collingwoods bid than just numbers and Im sure there was but really it is what it is, hoping we join next year, I love any team in the old Yellow and Black.
This argument will only ever be decided when the competition starts and we see how many come through the gate .I don't care whether women play football good on them but when you are talking womens AFL fulltime professional you have to be good otherwise people won't watch period it won't be a case of " i'll make allowances for the pathetic standard because its a womens game so don't mind parting with how ever many bucks to come through the gate " .AFL has its appeal because they are strong ,fast superior athletes at the peak of their powers putting on a breathtaking at times spectacle and you can go a fair few levels below AFL (VFL ,VAFA, country suburban) and still get a good afternoons entertainment of good hard footy, women by virtue of the very reasons you have said slower,lighter ,shorter can't hope to deliver the same spectacle yet the players are getting $25K all for an exercise in political correctness.That would only apply if they played against men. Saying women in a female only sport competition are inferior to men is actually saying women are inferior. And as the previous post says, in almost all Olympic contests, female results are slower, shorter, lighter etc than men's.
Sent from my XT1068 using Tapatalk
I don't see women as inferior at all .I'm all for equality in the workplace ,I just see them as inferior football players and the womens AFL a complete waste of time and money all for the sake of the AFL maintaining political correctness.