Remove this Banner Ad

MRP / Trib. WTF MRP!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ochre
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

No, McGinnity is challenged enough right now.
But with this ruling he could play v Adelaide. We gotta do something about that.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I thought he would go. It wasn't very severe, but was still head high. We're lucky ROK likes to get on with his footy, if he stayed down and/or went off, it couldve been graded differently.
 
One guy almost decapitates a player the other gives a guys sack an elbow massage. One gets nothing the other gets three weeks. Anyone else think this is completely around the wrong way?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

One guy almost decapitates a player the other gives a guys sack an elbow massage. One gets nothing the other gets three weeks. Anyone else think this is completely around the wrong way?
Craniums and Plums are both considered out of bounds equally, so yes it is seriously wrong and out of whack. MRP/Tribunal:thumbsdown:
 
Some people were going on about Brennan taking out LRT, but he was never in any serious trouble given that he was attacking the ball only.

Yeah that was probably me who stirred things up. I was just concerned that given the AFL's evangelical approach to ending head high contact Brennan could be in bother. Thankfully not. Pleasantly suprised MacKenzie's incident didn't even get looked at.

As for Paddy, well he shouldn't survive the axe this week regardless of what the MRP did.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Why doesn't Woosha just give him a few weeks for the heck of it.

Not sure what's happened to McGinnity this year. Last year IMO he was a barometer of our team and defensive pressure. This year he's the opposite.
 
North fans = biggest flogs on BF.

And that is saying something given the stuff on our board after the loss on the weekend...
This, but i reserve to the right to be a flog when it suits as well.

FREE McGINNITY I say!
 
Perhaps we could argue that ROK is as good a player as Judd and therefore requires his level of protection in the game?
We argued that Thomas is a diver lets throw it the other way and see how it goes
 
yeah Brennan and Mark Enzie were to be looked at. Both did not get a mention

Although it was not good to see the Sydney player (was it LRT? - i forget) off to hospital, Brennan had no case to answer as bother players were going for the ball and the Sydney player went in low and copped an accidental knee to the head.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom