Red mist
Reynholm Industries
- Jun 30, 2014
- 29,143
- 34,097
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, East Side Hawks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proof of how difficult it is to cater for every level of intellect on the internet.Geez, here's another one rewriting history, lets all remember Phil fondly but it's not the first time we have played like this. Bulldogs or GWS games ring a bell.
can we please stop using the word cheat when referring to the goal review ****up
gross incompetence does not equate to cheating
gross incompetence..How could any umpire that was looking at the TV screen adjudicating the Wright decision miss that his foot hit the ball?
They cant accidently miss that, its impossible, every single person watching that replay all over Australia could (and did) assess that as a goal.
goal umpire thought it was a behindDid the goal umpire rule it a goal, and then the video umpire overruled it?
Or did the goal umpire rule it a behind and then the video umpire didn't overrule it?
goal umpire thought it was a behind
can't understand why hot spot technology hasn't been invested in here. would be perfectI'm not sure what we're complaining about then.
This is the problem with a video review that doesn't utilise any snickometer-like technology. Yeah, sure, it looked like Wright's foot touched the ball, but it's still not conclusive because all you've got is vision, there's no sound or touch technology.
It's like the third umpire in cricket trying to judge a knick by vision alone. That would be absurd.
Until we invest in the technology, goal reviews will continue to be a farce.
just on the goal review, the reviewer didn't make the final call, the field umpire did. i reckon there was a tech issue, hence the call that the goal umpire originally made stood
Proof of how difficult it is to cater for every level of intellect on the internet.
Put simply we don't stream forward out of stoppages,
In an alternate reality Thommo retired to become a fireman, and Kane Cornes played on.
Apparently it comes on quick. One day fine. Next day sweating with temp etc.If thats the case why did they even bother selecting him. Keep all the guys who mightbe suffering away from the others.
So we brought in Bob to replace Bernie as a sub ?
The lack of thought process at our club never ceases to amaze me.
I am referring to the BS press conferences, the complete lack of transparency with selections and the lack of spirit and effort on field. We weren't beaten by a better side, we were pathetic.You state how un Phil Walsh like we have been the last couple of weeks, I list the GWS & Bulldogs games as similar type games where we didn't turn up & our selection were equally bad and you go the personal attack.
Are you saying those games/selections were un Phil Walsh type games as well?
True but in this case the effect was the same.can we please stop using the word cheat when referring to the goal review ****up
gross incompetence does not equate to cheating
fwiw I find it a completely baffling decision no matter what technical problems existed. it is difficult to understand how anyone could think he didnt just flick it with his toe.
I'm not sure what we're complaining about then.
This is the problem with a video review that doesn't utilise any snickometer-like technology. Yeah, sure, it looked like Wright's foot touched the ball, but it's still not conclusive because all you've got is vision, there's no sound or touch technology.
It's like the third umpire in cricket trying to judge a knick by vision alone. That would be absurd.
Until we invest in the technology, goal reviews will continue to be a farce.
just on the goal review, the reviewer didn't make the final call, the field umpire did. i reckon there was a tech issue, hence the call that the goal umpire originally made stood
UGLY: Im not seeing much of Phil Walsh in that performance, or the press conferences leading up to it, or since. Just an opinion but I reckon our football department has been very un Phil Walsh like for the past 2 weeks.
We'll never get complete transparency with selection...... When Sando went transparent we all said he was a moron, telegraphing the opposition our moves.I am referring to the BS press conferences, the complete lack of transparency with selections and the lack of spirit and effort on field. We weren't beaten by a better side, we were pathetic.
Non statistical roles, FFS. That was a return to the Trigg era.
Plenty of people understood exactly what I meant. You chose the path it went down.
The whole goal review process is inconclusive...that's why people boo ad nauseam when the maggots go down the path. Joke is a joke when proven week in week out.No the reviewers call was "inconclusive".