- May 1, 2005
- 3,770
- 6,169
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Kangas, Roos, Shinboners
Thread turned into a cracker.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Perhaps they'll be cutting Shapes around them!When we beat * next year I hope McDonald, McKenzie and Macmillan give their supporters the Scotch Finger.
This thread goes from Smiths to Strength...Nah * they're all f***ing smiths chips - chemically produced spuds!
If we're talking *essendon shapes, I hope they're well and truly barbequed, come Rd 1.
JAMES Hird has lost the support of the man who could soon become the next Premier of Victoria.
On the eve of the Victorian state election, Opposition leader Daniel Andrews revealed his view that the Essendon coach should be sacked if players are banned over the discredited 2012 supplements regime.
The Victorian Labor leader, a paid up Essendon member, believes Hird's position would become untenable.
On Thursday, Bombers chairman Paul Little revealed that in the event of guilty verdicts the club's members would help the board decide Hird's fate.
Asked how he would vote if such circumstances came to pass, Andrews said he would go against Hird.
"I'd be voting 'no' because, frankly, we need to move on," Andrews told SEN radio on Friday morning.
"I've got great respect for James as a player and someone who has led on the field and off but, frankly, we need a clean break with this. We need to move on. That's just the way these things are."
Ha Ha
Prescient headline?
Haha most of that is actually a $5m loan they took out presumably under the pretense of "the new facilities". They had this bit a bit earlier in the document on the ASADA costs:I enjoyed this bit for 2014. Financial report :- "Other Financial liabilities"
View attachment 94913
Haha most of that is actually a $5m loan they took out presumably under the pretense of "the new facilities". They had this bit a bit earlier in the document on the ASADA costs:
The above result is after charging an amount of $1,071,438 consisting of legal and consulting fees, net of insurance recoveries, in relation
to the ASADA investigation. The corresponding cost in 2013, which included the fine imposed by the AFL, was $3,939,710.
Sounds like most of what they would have spent this year has been recovered through insurance. However, I'm also pretty sure that figure doesn't include the payout on the Robinson case. That is probably hidden in the ~$58m classified as "Payments to suppliers, employees and players"
Got my vote because of this.JAMES Hird has lost the support of the man who could soon become the next Premier of Victoria.
On the eve of the Victorian state election, Opposition leader Daniel Andrews revealed his view that the Essendon coach should be sacked if players are banned over the discredited 2012 supplements regime.
The Victorian Labor leader, a paid up Essendon member, believes Hird's position would become untenable.
On Thursday, Bombers chairman Paul Little revealed that in the event of guilty verdicts the club's members would help the board decide Hird's fate.
Asked how he would vote if such circumstances came to pass, Andrews said he would go against Hird.
"I'd be voting 'no' because, frankly, we need to move on," Andrews told SEN radio on Friday morning.
"I've got great respect for James as a player and someone who has led on the field and off but, frankly, we need a clean break with this. We need to move on. That's just the way these things are."
Ha Ha
That and the day off before the Grand Final.I doubt his opinion will influence things, though. Which would be the point of voting for him.