I had stopped. You started it again.
[/discussion]
And you're continuing with it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I had stopped. You started it again.
[/discussion]
Quoted for truth.Who the hell said we should? Stop making things up. It's the same way you invent stats to back up your arguments. People see through it and you just look like an utter fool.
After initial frustration of LP1's making up of stats I've now come to quite enjoy it. It's like watching someone play out their fantasy and then pass it off as fact.
How'd the world cup go ?Hey guys, Ashes gone. Congratulations England, Anderson owns Aussies. Bow Down
How'd the world cup go ?
Agree on Voges, S.Marsh has to come in.Adam Voges needs to go, he is no Chris Rogers,
Stop hurting my feelings
Hey guys, Ashes gone. Congratulations England, Anderson owns Aussies. Bow Down
Agree on Voges, S.Marsh has to come in.
The cupboard is as bare as anything if we are relying on S.Marsh to do anything more than average 35.
When he scores he scores big, he will either score a hundred or a 0, unlike the walking wicket Voges who feasts on minnow attack
Hey guys, Ashes gone. Congratulations England, Anderson owns Aussies. Bow Down
When was the last time India played a five test series? Has it been so long that you have forgotten how to count?
Smarsh for Voges and batting at 4 ahead of Clarke.
Siddle for Starc.
Rogers
Warner
Smith
SMarsh
Clarke
MMarsh
Nevill
Johnson
Siddle
Hazlewood
Lyon
Why not make the side worse by bringing in the pedestrian medium pace of Siddle. If ever there was a bowler you would want for batting practice and for building a batsman's confidence it would have to be this bloke.
Another thing, Siddle shouldn't bat higher than Hazelwood or Lyon, would be the worst batsman in the squad and that includes Voges.
Does that matter, our bats with the except of the top 3 haven't really looked threatening.Will changing the side make much difference? Doubt it, but having written that, they'll make at least one change. Best hope is that TB isn't too bowler friendly.
Siddle should be picked for numerous reasons, including:
Where he bats is much of a muchness. Where our lower order batsman bat really isn't an issue.
- He's a bowler who's able to build pressure through line and length bowling (watch how he would always bowl to Kevin Pietersen, he would bore him into playing a rash shot). We have no bowler who's able to do that consistently at the moment.
- A bowler building pressure at one end will make Johnson and Hazlewood (or Johnson and Starc if they choose to drop Hazlewood, which would be the wrong call in my opinion) far more effective bowlers. It doesn't take Einstein to realise that Johnson was so effective in Australia and South AFrica over 2013/14 in major part because he had Siddle and Harris bowling tight at the other end.
- It gives Clarke an option if runs start leaking - since Watson isn't playing he doesn't have a bowler who can do that.
- He took 8 wickets last time he played a test at Trent Bridge, including 5 in the first innings.
- He's the most experienced bowler in English conditions, not only because this is his third tour here, but because he's played a number of county games in the last couple of years - including for Nottingham, who play their home games at Trent Bridge.
- He's apparently got his pace back and has been the hardest bowler to face in the nets (although given the way they talk about out of form batsmen's net form take that with a pinch of salt).