Buggs snipe on Riewoldt
- Thread starter Adam H
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Even if you accidently push someone in the back it is a free kick, hope it was accidental, if it wasn't and not a square up for a cheap shot by Reiwoldt ( which i doubt) then it was a coward shot and he should get a couple of weeks.
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
How can he get a couple of weeks, he isn't even getting charged
Did you read my post, if it was on purpose he should get a couple of weeks, it was just an opinion.
it is not what i like to see on a footy field.
BTW does not make me a Saints fan or a GWS hater
Accidental, Buggs was running into the contest and Riewoldt was backing out of it.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
LOL please if Bugg couldnt see Riewoldt he shouldnt be playing.
Upgrayedd
A Vote for Clive is a Vote for Justice
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
Using Gary Lyon as a point of reference, may as well give The Ox a call for his learned opinion, might not get much sense out of him but you'll get a tip for race 8 Ferntree Gully Wednesday night greyhounds.
Bugg is allowed to run to that contest and Roo should be expecting that impact being so close to the contest. Bugg was well within his rights to get into the position he got into. and Roo should be expecting impact that close to the contest. The fact he was so loose is his fault.
Also he didn't drop his shoulder, or do anything other than brace for impact with his forearms.
A free kick at best.
Also he didn't drop his shoulder, or do anything other than brace for impact with his forearms.
A free kick at best.
Thats pretty much the view of the MRP
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #87
I seriously doubt you know the rules to be honest.
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
It's plainly obvious you don't, 99% of people have explained to you why it isn't a reportable incident, the MRP looked at it and decided there was nothing in it.
It was a free kick at best, but you would argue with your own shadow in an empty room.
Just give it up and move on.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #89
To suggest that Riewoldt should expect contact from behind so its fair is just wrong. It was 100% a free kick and only luck saved him from suspension.
Everybody agrees it was a free kick because "accidental" doesnt come into play with free kicks. But it wasnt reportable.
Agree Riewoldt should have expected it, thats why its called an accident. But when you move backwards theres always a risk than you dont know whats behind you.
Agree Riewoldt should have expected it, thats why its called an accident. But when you move backwards theres always a risk than you dont know whats behind you.
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
It's a contact sport, you always expect contact, especially within 5 mtrs of the ball FFS
You can tell by the way he went back at riewoldt and wanted to confront Schneider when he came in that it was intentional.
very low act to hit someone from behind, reminded me of concas hit on that other GWS player last year.
Doesn't take much to hit someone from behind.
Maybe try and go back with the flight before sniping blokes Tomas, because you never do.
very low act to hit someone from behind, reminded me of concas hit on that other GWS player last year.
Doesn't take much to hit someone from behind.
Maybe try and go back with the flight before sniping blokes Tomas, because you never do.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #93
Ok so when Fyfe is at a boundary throw in you'd be happy for him to be cannoned into from behind at every stoppage.
yeah son
I've likely seen more football than you ever have or might. I watch multiple games, 12 months a year for many many years. I know exactly what i'm looking at.
If you are that close to a contest and aren't braced for contact from any angle, you deserve all you get. Unfortunately he got injured in the play but there was nothing malicious, reckless or even negligent in the contact. Riewoldt backed into Buggs path within 5m of a contest and got hit. tough.
harden up princess. it's football.
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #95
Fantastic so now your saying you can be picked off at any contest from behind because you should be expecting it. My God have a think about what your saying.
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
I'm done with you, you are either trolling, ignorant or a bit slow.
Go and whine to your mate plugga
- May 15, 2006
- 19,595
- 19,977
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- The Cobblers who do the Cobbling
I seriously doubt he comprehends the 5 mtr rule
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #98
I doubt you have any clue at all to be honest. If you seriously think its ok to pick a guy off just because he's with in 5m of the ball.
sigh
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #100
