Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you ever get tired of the constant Jew baiting?
Do you ever get tired of the constant Jew baiting?
It had to be a jew
The "rabbi" wasn't jewish?
As I've read Arthur C Clarke, I wanted to check up on these claims and couldn't find anything substantive. His work is still made and celebrated seemingly after all charges were dropped and he was knighted. Is this just due to lack of evidence? Obviously there is suspicion often cast on people who decide to live in poor non-English-speaking countries where victims might not be considered that by local communities and education & communication skills are low. But if he was 'notorious' I don't think people would happily still be promoting him, right? Obviously it took a long time for the Savile stuff to come out, though, so should I be chucking those books?CountryRace whilst there have been some links to Prince Charles all have lead to nothing, they've often claimed people like Saville & Arthur C. Clarke were close friends, but reality is they weren't. Bishop Ball is a different case as it is actually of only one case involving a minor so questions will be asked if a false complaint, Saville & Clarke were notorious though.
It's beside the point whether he was a Jew, isn't it?I'm guessing he was a Jewish rabbi
One plus zero equal one, no?
I'm guessing most people spoken about, are of Christian background
Keep flying the antisemitism flag but. Jolly good
That's the point. There's 5 pages of info about a bunch of potential peaodiphiles and Pogma picks out one of many and says "It had to be a jew". It was trolling and it was called out as antisemitism. Read from the top of the page down.It's beside the point whether he was a Jew, isn't it?
It's hardly 'anti-Semitic' to call-out a Jewish pedophile...
It's beside the point whether he was a Jew, isn't it?
It's hardly 'anti-Semitic' to call-out a Jewish pedophile...
Well what's wrong with that? Half the time you'd hear someone say 'oh it had to be a priest' or whatever. I'm not sure how this is different.That's the point. There's 5 pages of info about a bunch of potential peaodiphiles and Pogma picks out one of many and says "It had to be a jew". It was trolling and it was called out as antisemitism. Read from the top of the page down.
Well what's wrong with that? Half the time you'd hear someone say 'oh it had to be a priest' or whatever. I'm not sure how this is different.
Well what's wrong with that? Half the time you'd hear someone say 'oh it had to be a priest' or whatever. I'm not sure how this is different.
Why does gender or financial status make an abominable crime worse?yeah, its the same
If go around having sex with children you are a prick regardless of race or religion, IMHO
Even worse if you are a rich man part of elite establishment
The use of power to bully victims, cover up crimes, maintain and extend your crimes, etc. Basically it is not only a case of failing to show remorse, but it is using the levers of society to manipulate situations and people to completely remove the hope of a victim that they will ever get justice. Maybe there is also an assumption that if someone is rich and part of the organisational levels of society, they probably don't have a mental illness that stops them from knowing the direct and indirect impact of their crimes. Not that a mental illness should be an excuse. Not that I think establishment credentials is any guide to competence. But you did ask.Why does gender or financial status make an abominable crime worse?
Is it really that different from the many people who contend that 'whites' run the world?im not sure if a preoccupation with jews counts as anti semitism or not, but let's not pretend POGMA isn't obsessed with them (they run the world etc).
It depends if you're interested in facts or not.Is it really that different from the many people who contend that 'whites' run the world?
What are the facts in question?It depends if you're interested in facts or not.
Well, if you don't understand the facts central to those two suggestions, I guess there's little point in you forming those words into questions. I'll leave you to your baiting.What are the facts in question?
So, you've got nothing ? You don't want to address the relative control of Jewish people (by ancestry or religion) over media and finance. Certainly in relative terms to 'whites' (which is not even a race or religion). Racial and religious Jews yield a far greater 'privilege' in society.Well, if you don't understand the facts central to those two suggestions, I guess there's little point in you forming those words into questions. I'll leave you to your baiting.
I've got plenty. But as I'm not flirting with you I have little interest in putting along while you play coy.So, you've got nothing ? You don't want to address the relative control of Jewish people (by ancestry or religion) over media and finance. Certainly in relative terms to 'whites' (which is not even a race or religion). Racial and religious Jews yield a far greater 'privilege' in society.
Is it really that different from the many people who contend that 'whites' run the world?
I guess I have an agenda. A girl in the class I was tuting at Melbourne uni last semester (an Alexander technique class - nothing to do with social 'science') proceeded to tell me, totally off-the-cuff about how 'white males' run the world. Obviously this is a ridiculous and oversimplified explanation, and I had jumped to the conclusion that all students were being taught as such.im really not a fan of any assertion that's so simplistic but yes i agree that the two statements are similar. i guess i just dont experience as many extremists who claim whites run the world when compared to the jews. maybe im hanging out on the wrong forums
Oversimplified, but not ridiculous. White men do dominate the military and business worlds. They would be key indicators of power in the world.I guess I have an agenda. A girl in the class I was tuting at Melbourne uni last semester (an Alexander technique class - nothing to do with social 'science') proceeded to tell me, totally off-the-cuff about how 'white males' run the world. Obviously this is a ridiculous and oversimplified explanation, and I had jumped to the conclusion that all students were being taught as such.
I guess I have an agenda. A girl in the class I was tuting at Melbourne uni last semester (an Alexander technique class - nothing to do with social 'science') proceeded to tell me, totally off-the-cuff about how 'white males' run the world. Obviously this is a ridiculous and oversimplified explanation, and I had jumped to the conclusion that all students were being taught as such.