Autopsy Round 4 vs St. Kilda @ MARVEL - 08/04/23 - 7:30pm

[The Kings Ransom]

Long’s numbers mirrored Lemmons’ before we traded for him. I couldn’t and still can’t believe we wanted another Lemmons.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

He has virtually never played in the back line.
Had half a year in 2019 or something and was quite good at that time.
I didn't mind the recruit but the 4 year deal always seemed ridiculous - almost based on one single game, where he dominated in the last game of 2022.

I think he's done a few decent things, certainly not outstanding.
Last night was a particularly poor non-thinking performance.

Guys like Farrar and Long are killers because you kind of know they will give away one goal a game after losing focus or making a dumb mistake.

I'm happy for him to stay in the team for now..

 

[andleanback]

I really thought Ben Long might bring something hard and edgy to the table but he's just another grifter by the looks of things

Honestly how is Craig Cameron giving him a 4 year contract! Absolutely disgraceful list management along with Rory Atkins. How he’s still in the job is mind boggling, pushing guys out like bowes who actually has talent yet offered list cloggers long term contracts. Not sure why this isn’t a bigger story in the media and how he escapes the spotlight. Even giving up a 2nd round pick for berry who is a depth player at best and hasn’t even got a look in yet, just bad decision after bad decision. Giving Caleb graham another 4 years, why?

The side is clearly missing Rankine in the front half aswell, the one player that actually had some x-factor and could create his own scoring opportunities. Has left a huge hole.

 

[Disambiguous]

He has virtually never played in the back line.
Had half a year in 2019 or something and was quite good at that time.
I didn't mind the recruit but the 4 year deal always seemed ridiculous - almost based on one single game, where he dominated in the last game of 2022.

I think he's done a few decent things, certainly not outstanding.
Last night was a particularly poor non-thinking performance.

Guys like Farrar and Long are killers because you kind of know they will give away one goal a game after losing focus or making a dumb mistake.

I'm happy for him to stay in the team for now..

Teams do anything to get players into their sides that score a goal a game. We’ve got two players that will give them goals without even asking. And it costs the them nothing.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[2litre]

Sorry to intrude, but what was with the Phone lights in the crowd?

It was a bunch of rentacrowds.

 

[The Kings Ransom]

It was a bunch of rentacrowds.

This organised by the suns?
Free tickets to our section if you support and cheer?

 

[2litre]

This organised by the suns?
Free tickets to our section if you support and cheer?

Don't think so. Just a bunch of young boys wanting too get on tv. Saw the same last year for GWS at the MCG.

Reminded me of soccer crowd. I love the Suns and you could definitely see the real supporters at the game. Good turn out by the faithful. Go Suns

 

[Disambiguous]

What do you have to do to get a coaches vote?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[The Kings Ransom]

View attachment 1655581

What do you have to do to get a coaches vote?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Win the game generally helps.

 

[SandyToes]

Win the game generally helps.

Coaches votes are curious
If we lose badly I notice Dew never gives votes to our players no matter if they deserve it
Some coaches do though
Unlike Brownlow votes (mostly)or Media POTY / AFLPA awards it's not linear

 

[Disambiguous]

It's interesting Nick Daicos (A Gun) also had 38 possessions. Definitely didn't have ten tackles. He also played in a losing side. And he received seven coaches votes.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[The Kings Ransom]

It's interesting Nick Daicos (A Gun) also had 38 possessions. Definitely didn't have ten tackles. He also played in a losing side. And he received seven coaches votes.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Not sure you can really compare between games
Both played well.
I think Daicos probably had a better game, far fewer turnovers, more score involvements.
Although Anderson clearly did a lot more without the ball - more tackles as you mention, far more pressure applied.

Disposal efficiency: Daicos 76%, Anderson 63%
Goals: Daicos 2, Anderson 1
Score involvements: Daicos 12, Anderson 9
Turnovers: Daicos 2, Anderson 11
Intercept possessions: Daicos 6, Anderson 9
Meters Gained: Daicos 633m, Anderson 687m
Pressure acts: Daicos 12, Anderson 35

 

[Big Red Machine]

This organised by the suns?
Free tickets to our section if you support and cheer?

100% not organized by the club.

Bunch of deadshits doing it "for the memes"

 

[Disambiguous]

Not sure you can really compare between games
Both played well.
I think Daicos probably had a better game, far fewer turnovers, more score involvements.
Although Anderson clearly did a lot more without the ball - more tackles as you mention, far more pressure applied.

Disposal efficiency: Daicos 76%, Anderson 63%
Goals: Daicos 2, Anderson 1
Score involvements: Daicos 12, Anderson 9
Turnovers: Daicos 2, Anderson 11
Intercept possessions: Daicos 6, Anderson 9
Meters Gained: Daicos 633m, Anderson 687m
Pressure acts: Daicos 12, Anderson 35

Yes. Surely worth one vote.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[The Kings Ransom]

100% not organized by the club.

Bunch of deadshits doing it "for the memes

ill take any support we can get as long as they're not misbehaving

 

[Big Red Machine]

ill take any support we can get as long as they're not misbehaving

Yeah about that...

 

[Disambiguous]

View attachment 1655581

What do you have to do to get a coaches vote?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

I feel vindicated. Thanks, Seb Mottram.



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[MarcLocksCrustySock]

I feel vindicated. Thanks, Seb Mottram.



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

He did get 11 turnovers but I do agree.